These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33805944)

  • 21. Improving RNA nearest neighbor parameters for helices by going beyond the two-state model.
    Spasic A; Berger KD; Chen JL; Seetin MG; Turner DH; Mathews DH
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2018 Jun; 46(10):4883-4892. PubMed ID: 29718397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Expanded sequence dependence of thermodynamic parameters improves prediction of RNA secondary structure.
    Mathews DH; Sabina J; Zuker M; Turner DH
    J Mol Biol; 1999 May; 288(5):911-40. PubMed ID: 10329189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Understanding the errors of SHAPE-directed RNA structure modeling.
    Kladwang W; VanLang CC; Cordero P; Das R
    Biochemistry; 2011 Sep; 50(37):8049-56. PubMed ID: 21842868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. RnaPredict--an evolutionary algorithm for RNA secondary structure prediction.
    Wiese K; Deschenes A; Hendriks A
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2008; 5(1):25-41. PubMed ID: 18245873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. RNA Secondary Structure Prediction Based on Energy Models.
    Akiyama M; Sato K
    Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2586():89-105. PubMed ID: 36705900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. RNA secondary structure prediction with pseudoknots: Contribution of algorithm versus energy model.
    Jabbari H; Wark I; Montemagno C
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0194583. PubMed ID: 29621250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Computer modeling of structure-forming properties of plus- and minus- DNA chains, coding form 5S rRNA and t RNA].
    Kugushev EI; Kozlov NN
    Dokl Akad Nauk; 1993 Nov; 333(1):107-11. PubMed ID: 8298484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Swellix: a computational tool to explore RNA conformational space.
    Sloat N; Liu JW; Schroeder SJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Nov; 18(1):504. PubMed ID: 29157200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The determination of RNA folding nearest neighbor parameters.
    Andronescu M; Condon A; Turner DH; Mathews DH
    Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1097():45-70. PubMed ID: 24639154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Prediction of Secondary Structures Conserved in Multiple RNA Sequences.
    Xu ZZ; Mathews DH
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1490():35-50. PubMed ID: 27665591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evolutionary rate variation and RNA secondary structure prediction.
    Knudsen B; Andersen ES; Damgaard C; Kjems J; Gorodkin J
    Comput Biol Chem; 2004 Jul; 28(3):219-26. PubMed ID: 15261152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Prediction of RNA multiloop and pseudoknot conformations from a lattice-based, coarse-grain tertiary structure model.
    Jost D; Everaers R
    J Chem Phys; 2010 Mar; 132(9):095101. PubMed ID: 20210413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A bayesian statistical algorithm for RNA secondary structure prediction.
    Ding Y; Lawrence CE
    Comput Chem; 1999 Jun; 23(3-4):387-400. PubMed ID: 10404626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Characterization of 5S rRNA gene sequence and secondary structure in gymnosperms].
    Liu ZL; Zhang DM; Wang XR
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2003 Jan; 30(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 12812082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A sensitivity analysis of RNA folding nearest neighbor parameters identifies a subset of free energy parameters with the greatest impact on RNA secondary structure prediction.
    Zuber J; Sun H; Zhang X; McFadyen I; Mathews DH
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Jun; 45(10):6168-6176. PubMed ID: 28334976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Facilitating RNA structure prediction with microarrays.
    Kierzek E; Kierzek R; Turner DH; Catrina IE
    Biochemistry; 2006 Jan; 45(2):581-93. PubMed ID: 16401087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparing RNA secondary structures using a relaxed base-pair score.
    Agius P; Bennett KP; Zuker M
    RNA; 2010 May; 16(5):865-78. PubMed ID: 20360393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A dynamic programming algorithm for RNA structure prediction including pseudoknots.
    Rivas E; Eddy SR
    J Mol Biol; 1999 Feb; 285(5):2053-68. PubMed ID: 9925784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Predicting RNA H-type pseudoknots with the massively parallel genetic algorithm.
    Shapiro BA; Wu JC
    Comput Appl Biosci; 1997 Aug; 13(4):459-71. PubMed ID: 9283762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Rchange: algorithms for computing energy changes of RNA secondary structures in response to base mutations.
    Kiryu H; Asai K
    Bioinformatics; 2012 Apr; 28(8):1093-101. PubMed ID: 22373787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.