These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33806531)

  • 1. A Retrospective Comparison of Hemodynamic and Clinical Outcomes between Two Differently Designed Aortic Bioprostheses for Small Aortic Annuli.
    Kim DJ; Lee S; Joo HC; Youn YN; Yoo KJ; Lee SH
    J Clin Med; 2021 Mar; 10(5):. PubMed ID: 33806531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trifecta and Carpentier Edwards aortic bioprostheses: Comparison of six years follow-up outcomes.
    Pfister R; Frey V; Kirsch M; Tozzi P; Delay D; Gunga Z; Prêtre R; Niclauss L
    Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2023 May; 31(4):312-320. PubMed ID: 36991560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Trifecta has lower gradient and less prosthesis-patient mismatch than Mosaic Ultra in the aortic position: A prospective randomized study.
    Braathen B; Husebye T; Lunde IG; Tønnessen T
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2019 Oct; 158(4):1032-1039. PubMed ID: 30635187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mid-Term Clinical Outcomes and Hemodynamic Performances of Trifecta and Perimount Bioprostheses following Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Toto F; Leo L; Klersy C; Torre T; Theologou T; Pozzoli A; Caporali E; Demertzis S; Ferrari E
    J Cardiovasc Dev Dis; 2023 Mar; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 37103018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Aortic Valve Replacement in Elderly Patients With Small Aortic Annulus: Results With Three Different Bioprostheses.
    Chiariello GA; Bruno P; Villa E; Pasquini A; Pavone N; Cammertoni F; Mazza A; Colizzi C; Nesta M; Iafrancesco M; Perri G; Messina A; Troise G; Massetti M
    Innovations (Phila); 2019 Feb; 14(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 30848711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Early hemodynamic evaluation of Trifecta and Freestyle bioprostheses in patients with a small aortic root: preliminary results from a prospective randomized study.
    Tasca G; Stefano A; Giannico F; Lobiati E; Riva B; Galanti A; Triggiani M; Gamba A
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2014 Sep; 23(5):633-41. PubMed ID: 25799714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Durability and Performance of 2298 Trifecta Aortic Valve Prostheses: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.
    Yongue C; Lopez DC; Soltesz EG; Roselli EE; Bakaeen FG; Gillinov AM; Pettersson GB; Semple ME; Rajeswaran J; Tong MZ; Jaber W; Blackstone EH; Svensson LG; Johnston DR
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2021 Apr; 111(4):1198-1205. PubMed ID: 33011168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comprehensive hemodynamic comparison and frequency of patient-prosthesis mismatch between the St. Jude Medical Trifecta and Epic Bioprosthetic aortic valves.
    Yadlapati A; Diep J; Barnes M; Grogan T; Bethencourt DM; Vorobiof G
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2014 Jun; 27(6):581-9. PubMed ID: 24534651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of early haemodynamics of 19-mm aortic valve bioprostheses in patients with a small aortic annulus.
    Domoto S; Niinami H; Uwabe K; Koike H; Tabata M; Morita K; Kambe M; Iguchi A
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2016 Jan; 22(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 26467641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The new St Jude Trifecta versus Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna and Magna Ease aortic bioprosthesis: is there a hemodynamic superiority?
    Wendt D; Thielmann M; Plicht B; Aßmann J; Price V; Neuhäuser M; Jakob H
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 May; 147(5):1553-60. PubMed ID: 23870159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comprehensive hemodynamic performance and frequency of patient-prosthesis mismatch of the St. Jude Medical Trifecta bioprosthetic aortic valve.
    Yadlapati A; Diep J; Barnes MJ; Grogan T; Bethencourt DM; Vorobiof G
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2014 Jul; 23(4):516-23. PubMed ID: 25803979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of early hemodynamic performance of 3 aortic valve bioprostheses.
    Ugur M; Suri RM; Daly RC; Dearani JA; Park SJ; Joyce LD; Burkhart HM; Greason KL; Schaff HV
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Nov; 148(5):1940-6. PubMed ID: 24530199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Matched Comparison of Two Different Biological Prostheses for Complete Supra-annular Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Fiegl K; Deutsch MA; Rondak IC; Lange R; Guenzinger R
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Sep; 63(6):459-66. PubMed ID: 25893918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bioprosthetic Valve Performance After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Self-Expanding Versus Balloon-Expandable Valves in Large Versus Small Aortic Valve Annuli: Insights From the CHOICE Trial and the CHOICE-Extend Registry.
    Abdelghani M; Mankerious N; Allali A; Landt M; Kaur J; Sulimov DS; Merten C; Sachse S; Mehilli J; Neumann FJ; Frerker C; Kurz T; El-Mawardy M; Richardt G; Abdel-Wahab M
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Dec; 11(24):2507-2518. PubMed ID: 30503595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rest and exercise haemodynamics in patients with one of two stented bioprostheses and in healthy controls with small aortic annuli.
    Stock S; Lohmann I; Hanke T; Stierle U; Richardt D; Tsvelodub S; Sievers HH
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2018 Mar; 26(3):425-430. PubMed ID: 29095979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. St. Jude Trifecta versus Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna valves for the treatment of aortic stenosis: comparison of early Doppler-echocardiography and hemodynamic performance.
    Minardi G; Pergolini A; Zampi G; Pulignano G; Pero G; Sbaraglia F; Pino PG; Cioffi G; Musumeci F
    Monaldi Arch Chest Dis; 2013 Sep; 80(3):126-32. PubMed ID: 24818319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surgical sutureless and transcatheter aortic valves: hemodynamic performance and clinical outcomes in propensity score-matched high-risk populations with severe aortic stenosis.
    Kamperidis V; van Rosendael PJ; de Weger A; Katsanos S; Regeer M; van der Kley F; Mertens B; Sianos G; Ajmone Marsan N; Bax JJ; Delgado V
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Apr; 8(5):670-7. PubMed ID: 25946438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Matched-Paired Comparative Analysis of the Hemodynamics of the Trifecta and Perimount Aortic Bioprostheses.
    Rubens FD; Rao RV; Chan V; Burwash IG
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2015 Jul; 24(4):487-95. PubMed ID: 26897822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ten-year comparison of pericardial tissue valves versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age.
    Weber A; Noureddine H; Englberger L; Dick F; Gahl B; Aymard T; Czerny M; Tevaearai H; Stalder M; Carrel TP
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Nov; 144(5):1075-83. PubMed ID: 22341653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Early in-vivo hemodynamic comparison of supra-annular aortic bioprostheses: Trifecta versus Perimount Magna Ease.
    Modi A; Pousios D; Sadeque S; Velissaris T; Barlow C; Livesey S; Tsang GM; Ohri SK
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2014 May; 23(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 25296457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.