176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33807997)
21. Weighted gene correlation network analysis identifies microenvironment-related genes signature as prognostic candidate for Grade II/III glioma.
Li Y; Deng G; Zhang H; Qi Y; Gao L; Tan Y; Hu P; Wang Y; Liu B; Chen Q
Aging (Albany NY); 2020 Nov; 12(21):22122-22138. PubMed ID: 33186124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Radiomics MRI Phenotyping with Machine Learning to Predict the Grade of Lower-Grade Gliomas: A Study Focused on Nonenhancing Tumors.
Park YW; Choi YS; Ahn SS; Chang JH; Kim SH; Lee SK
Korean J Radiol; 2019 Sep; 20(9):1381-1389. PubMed ID: 31464116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Identification of Critical m
Zheng J; Wang X; Qiu Y; Wang M; Yu H; Zhou Z; Wu Z; Jiang X
Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():9959212. PubMed ID: 34212046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The Prognostic Value of EMT in Glioma and its Role in the Glioma Immune Microenvironment.
Ning W; Qiu Z; Ji X; Wang X; An Y; Wang S; Zhang H
J Mol Neurosci; 2020 Oct; 70(10):1501-1511. PubMed ID: 32495005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Identification of a five B cell-associated gene prognostic and predictive signature for advanced glioma patients harboring immunosuppressive subtype preference.
Zhang C; Li J; Wang H; Song SW
Oncotarget; 2016 Nov; 7(45):73971-73983. PubMed ID: 27738332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. SHOX2 is a Potent Independent Biomarker to Predict Survival of WHO Grade II-III Diffuse Gliomas.
Zhang YA; Zhou Y; Luo X; Song K; Ma X; Sathe A; Girard L; Xiao G; Gazdar AF
EBioMedicine; 2016 Nov; 13():80-89. PubMed ID: 27840009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Elevated Na/H exchanger 1 (SLC9A1) emerges as a marker for tumorigenesis and prognosis in gliomas.
Guan X; Luo L; Begum G; Kohanbash G; Song Q; Rao A; Amankulor N; Sun B; Sun D; Jia W
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2018 Oct; 37(1):255. PubMed ID: 30333031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Advancing The Cancer Genome Atlas glioma MRI collections with expert segmentation labels and radiomic features.
Bakas S; Akbari H; Sotiras A; Bilello M; Rozycki M; Kirby JS; Freymann JB; Farahani K; Davatzikos C
Sci Data; 2017 Sep; 4():170117. PubMed ID: 28872634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Epigenomic Reprogramming as a Driver of Malignant Glioma.
Phillips RE; Soshnev AA; Allis CD
Cancer Cell; 2020 Nov; 38(5):647-660. PubMed ID: 32916125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Characterization of Hypoxia Signature to Evaluate the Tumor Immune Microenvironment and Predict Prognosis in Glioma Groups.
Lin W; Wu S; Chen X; Ye Y; Weng Y; Pan Y; Chen Z; Chen L; Qiu X; Qiu S
Front Oncol; 2020; 10():796. PubMed ID: 32500034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. RNA editing-based classification of diffuse gliomas: predicting isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation and chromosome 1p/19q codeletion.
Chen SC; Lo CM; Wang SH; Su EC
BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Dec; 20(Suppl 19):659. PubMed ID: 31870275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Radiogenomics of lower-grade gliomas: machine learning-based MRI texture analysis for predicting 1p/19q codeletion status.
Kocak B; Durmaz ES; Ates E; Sel I; Turgut Gunes S; Kaya OK; Zeynalova A; Kilickesmez O
Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):877-886. PubMed ID: 31691122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Discovery of 5-Signature Predicting Survival of Patients with Lower-Grade Glioma.
Xiao H; Bai J; Yan M; Ji K; Tian W; Liu D; Ning T; Liu X; Zou J
World Neurosurg; 2019 Jun; 126():e765-e772. PubMed ID: 30853516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Survival and low-grade glioma: the emergence of genetic information.
Claus EB; Walsh KM; Wiencke JK; Molinaro AM; Wiemels JL; Schildkraut JM; Bondy ML; Berger M; Jenkins R; Wrensch M
Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Jan; 38(1):E6. PubMed ID: 25552286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Elevated TYROBP expression predicts poor prognosis and high tumor immune infiltration in patients with low-grade glioma.
Lu J; Peng Y; Huang R; Feng Z; Fan Y; Wang H; Zeng Z; Ji Y; Wang Y; Wang Z
BMC Cancer; 2021 Jun; 21(1):723. PubMed ID: 34162355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Genetic Discrimination of Grade 3 and Grade 4 Gliomas by Artificial Neural Network.
Mekler AA; Schwartz DR; Savelieva OE
Cell Mol Neurobiol; 2023 Dec; 44(1):13. PubMed ID: 38150033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A comprehensive analysis of the angiogenesis-related genes in glioblastoma multiforme vs. brain lower grade glioma.
Biterge-Sut B
Arq Neuropsiquiatr; 2020 Jan; 78(1):34-38. PubMed ID: 32074192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A risk signature of four aging-related genes has clinical prognostic value and is associated with a tumor immune microenvironment in glioma.
Luo H; Tao C; Long X; Huang K; Zhu X
Aging (Albany NY); 2021 Jun; 13(12):16198-16218. PubMed ID: 34114970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. PI3 kinase mutations and mutational load as poor prognostic markers in diffuse glioma patients.
Draaisma K; Wijnenga MM; Weenink B; Gao Y; Smid M; Robe P; van den Bent MJ; French PJ
Acta Neuropathol Commun; 2015 Dec; 3():88. PubMed ID: 26699864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Identification of Gender-Specific Molecular Differences in Glioblastoma (GBM) and Low-Grade Glioma (LGG) by the Analysis of Large Transcriptomic and Epigenomic Datasets.
Khan MT; Prajapati B; Lakhina S; Sharma M; Prajapati S; Chosdol K; Sinha S
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():699594. PubMed ID: 34621669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
