293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33809468)
41. Preferences in 'Jalapeño' Pepper Attributes: A Choice Study in Mexico.
Sánchez-Toledano BI; Cuevas-Reyes V; Kallas Z; Zegbe JA
Foods; 2021 Dec; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 34945662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Australian Consumers' Preferences for Food Attributes: A Latent Profile Analysis.
Zhang A; Jakku E
Foods; 2020 Dec; 10(1):. PubMed ID: 33379280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Consumer Preferences for Cheese Products with Quality Labels: The Case of Parmigiano Reggiano and Comté.
Menozzi D; Yeh CH; Cozzi E; Arfini F
Animals (Basel); 2022 May; 12(10):. PubMed ID: 35625145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Influence of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Food Attributes on Consumers' Acceptance of Reformulated Food Products: a Systematic Review.
Bolha A; Blaznik U; Korošec M
Zdr Varst; 2020 Dec; 60(1):72-78. PubMed ID: 33488825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Consumers' perceptions of intrinsic and extrinsic attributes as indicators of safety and quality of chicken meat: Actionable information for public health authorities and the chicken industry.
Katiyo W; Coorey R; Buys EM; de Kock HL
J Food Sci; 2020 Jun; 85(6):1845-1855. PubMed ID: 32469089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Perception, risk attitude and willingness to pay for safety and innovative attributes of processed chicken meat in Oyo State, Nigeria.
Idiaye CO; Ogidan OA; Oluwatayo IB
Ital J Food Saf; 2020 Oct; 9(3):8506. PubMed ID: 33282754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Assessing consumers' preferences for beef and lamb meat linked to wildfire prevention services.
Lecegui A; Olaizola AM; Varela E
Meat Sci; 2023 Dec; 206():109346. PubMed ID: 37741031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Credence cues of pork are more important than consumers' culinary skills to boost their purchasing intention.
Argemí-Armengol I; Villalba D; Ripoll G; Teixeira A; Álvarez-Rodríguez J
Meat Sci; 2019 Aug; 154():11-21. PubMed ID: 30954794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Consumers' willingness to buy meat and seafood products close to the expiry date: an exploratory study from Denmark.
Pandey S; Bohl A; Favari V; Mora P; Phuyal S; Sojková E; Budhathoki M; Thomsen M
Front Nutr; 2024; 11():1371634. PubMed ID: 38533462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Paying for the Greater Good?-What Information Matters for Beijing Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Plant-Based Meat?
Wang H; Chen Q; Zhu C; Bao J
Foods; 2022 Aug; 11(16):. PubMed ID: 36010460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Consumer preferences for reduced antibiotic use in Danish pig production.
Denver S; Jensen JD; Christensen T
Prev Vet Med; 2021 Apr; 189():105310. PubMed ID: 33667759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Do demographic and beef eating preferences impact on South African consumers' willingness to pay (WTP) for graded beef?
Strydom P; Burrow H; Polkinghorne R; Thompson J
Meat Sci; 2019 Apr; 150():122-130. PubMed ID: 30677552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Effects of Consumers' Sensory Attributes Perception on Their Willingness to Pay for Apple Cultivars Grown at Different Altitudes: Are They Different?
Gracia A; Cantín CM
Foods; 2022 Sep; 11(19):. PubMed ID: 36230098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The United States pork niche market phenomenon.
Honeyman MS; Pirog RS; Huber GH; Lammers PJ; Hermann JR
J Anim Sci; 2006 Aug; 84(8):2269-75. PubMed ID: 16864889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Factors affecting the purchase behaviour of farmers' markets consumers.
Adanacioglu H
PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0255435. PubMed ID: 34329359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Emerging market for pork with animal welfare attribute in China: An ethical perspective.
Liang Y; Xu Y; Lai D; Hua G; Huang D; Wang H; Li H; Han L
Meat Sci; 2023 Jan; 195():108994. PubMed ID: 36240585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Refurbished or Remanufactured?-An Experimental Study on Consumer Choice Behavior.
Chen Y; Wang J; Jia X
Front Psychol; 2020; 11():781. PubMed ID: 32670124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Consumers' preferences for fresh yam: a focus group study.
Barlagne C; Cornet D; Blazy JM; Diman JL; Ozier-Lafontaine H
Food Sci Nutr; 2017 Jan; 5(1):54-66. PubMed ID: 28070316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Chinese Consumers' Heterogeneous Preferences for the Front-of-Package Labeling on Fresh Pork: A Choice Experiment Approach.
Huang B; Li H; Huang Z; Huang J; Sun J
Foods; 2022 Sep; 11(18):. PubMed ID: 36141057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. European Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Red Meat Labelling Attributes.
Cubero Dudinskaya E; Naspetti S; Arsenos G; Caramelle-Holtz E; Latvala T; Martin-Collado D; Orsini S; Ozturk E; Zanoli R
Animals (Basel); 2021 Feb; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 33672549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
