These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

617 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33809721)

  • 21. The use of robots in stroke rehabilitation: A narrative review.
    Weber LM; Stein J
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2018; 43(1):99-110. PubMed ID: 30056437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Emergence of flexible technology in developing advanced systems for post-stroke rehabilitation: a comprehensive review.
    Khan MA; Saibene M; Das R; Brunner I; Puthusserypady S
    J Neural Eng; 2021 Dec; 18(6):. PubMed ID: 34736239
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Future directions of stroke rehabilitation].
    Kakuda W
    Rinsho Shinkeigaku; 2020 Mar; 60(3):181-186. PubMed ID: 32101849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Brain-machine interfaces for rehabilitation in stroke: A review.
    López-Larraz E; Sarasola-Sanz A; Irastorza-Landa N; Birbaumer N; Ramos-Murguialday A
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2018; 43(1):77-97. PubMed ID: 30056435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Robot-assisted Therapy for the Upper Limb after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.
    Yozbatiran N; Francisco GE
    Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2019 May; 30(2):367-384. PubMed ID: 30954153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The H2 robotic exoskeleton for gait rehabilitation after stroke: early findings from a clinical study.
    Bortole M; Venkatakrishnan A; Zhu F; Moreno JC; Francisco GE; Pons JL; Contreras-Vidal JL
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2015 Jun; 12():54. PubMed ID: 26076696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Computational neurorehabilitation: modeling plasticity and learning to predict recovery.
    Reinkensmeyer DJ; Burdet E; Casadio M; Krakauer JW; Kwakkel G; Lang CE; Swinnen SP; Ward NS; Schweighofer N
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2016 Apr; 13(1):42. PubMed ID: 27130577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Classifying Residual Stroke Severity Using Robotics-Assisted Stroke Rehabilitation: Machine Learning Approach.
    Jeter R; Greenfield R; Housley SN; Belykh I
    JMIR Biomed Eng; 2024 Oct; 9():e56980. PubMed ID: 39374054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. State of the Art and Future Directions for Lower Limb Robotic Exoskeletons.
    Young AJ; Ferris DP
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2017 Feb; 25(2):171-182. PubMed ID: 26829794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A review of lower extremity assistive robotic exoskeletons in rehabilitation therapy.
    Chen G; Chan CK; Guo Z; Yu H
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 2013; 41(4-5):343-63. PubMed ID: 24941413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Brain-machine interfaces in neurorehabilitation of stroke.
    Soekadar SR; Birbaumer N; Slutzky MW; Cohen LG
    Neurobiol Dis; 2015 Nov; 83():172-9. PubMed ID: 25489973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [New technologies and robotics].
    Kruppa C; Benner S; Brinkemper A; Aach M; Reimertz C; Schildhauer TA
    Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb); 2023 Jan; 126(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 36515725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of human-robot interaction on muscular synergies on healthy people and post-stroke chronic patients.
    Scano A; Chiavenna A; Caimmi M; Malosio M; Tosatti LM; Molteni F
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():527-532. PubMed ID: 28813874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Construction of efficacious gait and upper limb functional interventions based on brain plasticity evidence and model-based measures for stroke patients.
    Daly JJ; Ruff RL
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2007 Dec; 7():2031-45. PubMed ID: 18167618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Hybrid robotic systems for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: A review.
    Resquín F; Cuesta Gómez A; Gonzalez-Vargas J; Brunetti F; Torricelli D; Molina Rueda F; Cano de la Cuerda R; Miangolarra JC; Pons JL
    Med Eng Phys; 2016 Nov; 38(11):1279-1288. PubMed ID: 27692878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Robot-assisted gait training for stroke patients: current state of the art and perspectives of robotics.
    Morone G; Paolucci S; Cherubini A; De Angelis D; Venturiero V; Coiro P; Iosa M
    Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat; 2017; 13():1303-1311. PubMed ID: 28553117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Automating activity-based interventions: the role of robotics.
    Hidler J; Hamm LF; Lichy A; Groah SL
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2008; 45(2):337-44. PubMed ID: 18566951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Upper limb robotics applied to neurorehabilitation: An overview of clinical practice.
    Duret C; Mazzoleni S
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2017; 41(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 28505985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Three upper limb robotic devices for stroke rehabilitation: a review and clinical perspective.
    Bishop L; Stein J
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2013; 33(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 23949043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Physically interactive robotic technology for neuromotor rehabilitation.
    Hogan N; Krebs HI
    Prog Brain Res; 2011; 192():59-68. PubMed ID: 21763518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.