BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33809967)

  • 1. The Utility of Combined Target and Systematic Prostate Biopsies in the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 Based on Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Kato D; Ozawa K; Takeuchi S; Kawase M; Kawase K; Nakai C; Takai M; Iinuma K; Nakane K; Kato H; Matsuo M; Suzui N; Miyazaki T; Koie T
    Curr Oncol; 2021 Mar; 28(2):1294-1301. PubMed ID: 33809967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effectiveness and Accuracy of MRI-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy Based on PI-RADS v2.1 Category in Transition/Peripheral Zone of the Prostate.
    Liu Y; Wang S; Xu G; Zhou B; Zhang Y; Ye B; Xiang L; Zhang Y; Xu H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 Sep; 58(3):709-717. PubMed ID: 36773016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Diagnostic efficacy of prostate cancer using targeted biopsy with 6-core systematic biopsy for patients with PI-RADS 5].
    Liu Y; Yuan CW; Wu JY; Shen Q; Xiao JX; Zhao Z; Wang XY; Li XS; He ZS; Zhou LQ
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2023 Oct; 55(5):812-817. PubMed ID: 37807733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing the Clinical Value of Positive Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Young Men with a Suspicion of Prostate Cancer.
    Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; Soligo M; De Cobelli F; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Esposito A; Brembilla G; Karnes RJ; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 4(4):594-600. PubMed ID: 31204312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prostate cancer detection rate in men undergoing transperineal template-guided saturation and targeted prostate biopsy.
    Kaufmann B; Saba K; Schmidli TS; Stutz S; Bissig L; Britschgi AJ; Schaeren E; Gu A; Langenegger N; Sulser T; Eberli D; Keller EX; Hermanns T; Poyet C
    Prostate; 2022 Feb; 82(3):388-396. PubMed ID: 34914121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A clinical available decision support scheme for optimizing prostate biopsy based on mpMRI.
    Hou Y; Jiang KW; Zhang J; Bao ML; Shi HB; Qu JR; Cheng G; Zhang YD
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2022 Apr; 25(4):727-734. PubMed ID: 35067674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Scores to Select an Optimal Prostate Biopsy Method: A Secondary Analysis of the Trio Study.
    Ahdoot M; Lebastchi AH; Long L; Wilbur AR; Gomella PT; Mehralivand S; Daneshvar MA; Yerram NK; O'Connor LP; Wang AZ; Gurram S; Bloom J; Siddiqui MM; Linehan WM; Merino M; Choyke PL; Pinsky P; Parnes H; Shih JH; Turkbey B; Wood BJ; Pinto PA;
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Apr; 5(2):176-186. PubMed ID: 33846112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prostate biopsy in the era of MRI-targeting: towards a judicious use of additional systematic biopsy.
    Deniffel D; Perlis N; Ghai S; Girgis S; Healy GM; Fleshner N; Hamilton R; Kulkarni G; Toi A; van der Kwast T; Zlotta A; Finelli A; Haider MA
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7544-7554. PubMed ID: 35507051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of biparametric and multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
    Xu L; Zhang G; Shi B; Liu Y; Zou T; Yan W; Xiao Y; Xue H; Feng F; Lei J; Jin Z; Sun H
    Cancer Imaging; 2019 Dec; 19(1):90. PubMed ID: 31864408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric MRI- and microultrasound-targeted biopsy in biopsy-naïve patients with a PI-RADS 5 lesion: a single-institutional study.
    Avolio PP; Fasulo V; Sanchez-Salas R; Maffei D; Frego N; Lazzeri M; Paciotti M; Saita A; Hurle R; Guazzoni G; Casale P; Buffi NM; Lughezzani G
    World J Urol; 2023 Sep; 41(9):2335-2342. PubMed ID: 37418017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A cohort of transperineal electromagnetically tracked magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided biopsy: assessing the impact of inter-reader variability on cancer detection.
    Wajswol E; Winoker JS; Anastos H; Falagario U; Okhawere K; Martini A; Treacy PJ; Voutsinas N; Knauer CJ; Sfakianos JP; Lewis SC; Taouli BA; Rastinehad AR
    BJU Int; 2020 Apr; 125(4):531-540. PubMed ID: 31762182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of elastic fusion biopsy: Comparing prostate cancer detection between targeted and systematic biopsy.
    Oderda M; Albisinni S; Benamran D; Calleris G; Ciccariello M; Dematteis A; Diamand R; Descotes JL; Fiard G; Forte V; Giacobbe A; Marquis A; Marra G; Messas A; Muto G; Peltier A; Rius L; Simone G; Roumeguere T; Faletti R; Gontero P
    Prostate; 2023 Feb; 83(2):162-168. PubMed ID: 36259316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Added value of systematic biopsy in men with a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer undergoing biparametric MRI-targeted biopsy: multi-institutional external validation study.
    Falagario U; Jambor I; Taimen P; Syvänen KT; Kähkönen E; Merisaari H; Montoya Perez I; Knaapila J; Steiner A; Verho J; Tewari A; Aronen HJ; Carrieri G; Boström PJ; Ettala O
    World J Urol; 2021 Jun; 39(6):1879-1887. PubMed ID: 32778912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The combination of targeted and systematic prostate biopsies is the best protocol for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Fourcade A; Payrard C; Tissot V; Perrouin-Verbe MA; Demany N; Serey-Effeil S; Callerot P; Coquet JB; Doucet L; Deruelle C; Joulin V; Nonent M; Fournier G; Valeri A
    Scand J Urol; 2018 Jun; 52(3):174-179. PubMed ID: 29463177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development and validation of a nomogram based on biparametric MRI PI-RADS v2.1 and clinical parameters to avoid unnecessary prostate biopsies.
    Wang Y; Wang L; Tang X; Zhang Y; Zhang N; Zhi B; Niu X
    BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Aug; 23(1):106. PubMed ID: 37582697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the need for systematic biopsies in addition to targeted biopsies according to the characteristics of the index lesion at mpMRI. Results from a large, multi-institutional database.
    Barletta F; Mazzone E; Stabile A; Scuderi S; Brembilla G; de Angelis M; Cirulli GO; Cucchiara V; Gandaglia G; Karnes RJ; Roupret M; De Cobelli F; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    World J Urol; 2022 Nov; 40(11):2683-2688. PubMed ID: 36149448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Biparametric and Multiparametric MRI for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection With PI-RADS Version 2.1.
    Tamada T; Kido A; Yamamoto A; Takeuchi M; Miyaji Y; Moriya T; Sone T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Jan; 53(1):283-291. PubMed ID: 32614123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prostate cancer upgrading with serial prostate magnetic resonance imaging and repeat biopsy in men on active surveillance: are confirmatory biopsies still necessary?
    Osses DF; Drost FH; Verbeek JFM; Luiting HB; van Leenders GJLH; Bangma CH; Krestin GP; Roobol MJ; Schoots IG
    BJU Int; 2020 Jul; 126(1):124-132. PubMed ID: 32232921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Head-to-head comparison of biparametric versus multiparametric MRI of the prostate before robot-assisted transperineal fusion prostate biopsy.
    Thaiss WM; Moser S; Hepp T; Kruck S; Rausch S; Scharpf M; Nikolaou K; Stenzl A; Bedke J; Kaufmann S
    World J Urol; 2022 Oct; 40(10):2431-2438. PubMed ID: 35922717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer by transperineal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted prostate biopsy in smaller prostates.
    Dahl DM; Kim MM; Wu S; Lin SX; Crotty RK; Cornejo KM; Harisinghani MG; Feldman AS; Wu CL
    Urol Oncol; 2022 Oct; 40(10):451.e9-451.e14. PubMed ID: 36008257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.