301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33809970)
1. Dimensional Accuracy of Dental Models for Three-Unit Prostheses Fabricated by Various 3D Printing Technologies.
Yoo SY; Kim SK; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim JG
Materials (Basel); 2021 Mar; 14(6):. PubMed ID: 33809970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Precision and trueness of dental models manufactured with different 3-dimensional printing techniques.
Kim SY; Shin YS; Jung HD; Hwang CJ; Baik HS; Cha JY
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Jan; 153(1):144-153. PubMed ID: 29287640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of internal design on the accuracy of 3-dimensionally printed casts fabricated by stereolithography and digital light processing technology.
Chen Y; Li H; Zhai Z; Nakano T; Ishigaki S
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Sep; 130(3):381.e1-381.e7. PubMed ID: 37482533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of 3D Printed Models Created by Two Technologies of Printers with Different Designs of Model Base.
Rungrojwittayakul O; Kan JY; Shiozaki K; Swamidass RS; Goodacre BJ; Goodacre CJ; Lozada JL
J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):124-128. PubMed ID: 31498957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy evaluation of complete-arch models manufactured by three different 3D printing technologies: a three-dimensional analysis.
Emir F; Ayyildiz S
J Prosthodont Res; 2021 Aug; 65(3):365-370. PubMed ID: 33177305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Error analysis of stages involved in CBCT-guided implant placement with surgical guides when different printing technologies are used.
Yeager B; Çakmak G; Zheng F; Johnston WM; Yilmaz B
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 36690552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [A method to evaluate the trueness of reconstructed dental models made with photo-curing 3D printing technologies].
Xiao N; Sun YC; Zhao YJ; Wang Y
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2019 Feb; 51(1):120-130. PubMed ID: 30773556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing the accuracy (trueness and precision) of models of fixed dental prostheses fabricated by digital and conventional workflows.
Sim JY; Jang Y; Kim WC; Kim HY; Lee DH; Kim JH
J Prosthodont Res; 2019 Jan; 63(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 29615324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of 3-dimensional printing technologies on the precision, trueness, and accuracy of printed retainers.
Naeem OA; Bencharit S; Yang IH; Stilianoudakis SC; Carrico C; Tüfekçi E
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Apr; 161(4):582-591. PubMed ID: 35337648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dimensional accuracy and surface characteristics of 3D-printed dental casts.
Park JM; Jeon J; Koak JY; Kim SK; Heo SJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Sep; 126(3):427-437. PubMed ID: 32958301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Flexural Strength of 3D-Printing Resin Materials for Provisional Fixed Dental Prostheses.
Park SM; Park JM; Kim SK; Heo SJ; Koak JY
Materials (Basel); 2020 Sep; 13(18):. PubMed ID: 32911702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Precision and trueness of maxillary crowded models produced by 2 vat photopolymerization 3-dimensional printing techniques.
Rey-Joly Maura C; Godinho J; Amorim M; Pinto R; Marques D; Jardim L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Jul; 160(1):124-131. PubMed ID: 34172172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-Dimensional Evaluation on Accuracy of Conventional and Milled Gypsum Models and 3D Printed Photopolymer Models.
Choi JW; Ahn JJ; Son K; Huh JB
Materials (Basel); 2019 Oct; 12(21):. PubMed ID: 31731447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of additive manufacturing method and build angle on the accuracy of 3D-printed palatal plates.
Dai J; Li P; Spintzyk S; Liu C; Xu S
J Dent; 2023 May; 132():104449. PubMed ID: 36773740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the color stability and surface roughness of 3-unit provisional fixed partial dentures fabricated by milling, conventional and different 3D printing fabrication techniques.
Ellakany P; Fouda SM; AlGhamdi MA; Aly NM
J Dent; 2023 Apr; 131():104458. PubMed ID: 36806621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Quantitative evaluation of printing accuracy of multi-color and multi-hardness three-dimensional printing dental model with photopolymer jetting].
Shen YR; Chen H; Ma KN; Sun YC
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Jul; 56(7):652-658. PubMed ID: 34275220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of commercial 3D printers for the fabrication of surgical guides in dental implantology.
Rouzé l'Alzit F; Cade R; Naveau A; Babilotte J; Meglioli M; Catros S
J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103909. PubMed ID: 34852291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro accuracies of 3D printed models manufactured by two different printing technologies.
Emir F; Ceylan G; Ayyildiz S
Eur Oral Res; 2021 May; 55(2):80-85. PubMed ID: 34250474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of a simplified 3D-printed implant surgical guide.
Kim T; Lee S; Kim GB; Hong D; Kwon J; Park JW; Kim N
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Aug; 124(2):195-201.e2. PubMed ID: 31753464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Intaglio Surface Trueness of Interim Dental Crowns Fabricated with SLA 3D Printing, DLP 3D Printing, and Milling Technologies.
Son K; Lee JH; Lee KB
Healthcare (Basel); 2021 Aug; 9(8):. PubMed ID: 34442120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
