These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33813104)
1. No difference in subjective and objective clinical outcomes between arthroscopic transtibial and open inlay posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques in the treatment of multi-ligamentous knee injuries. Zhang J; Zhang H; Zhang Z; Zheng T; Li Y Knee; 2021 Jun; 30():18-25. PubMed ID: 33813104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is the all-arthroscopic tibial inlay double-bundle PCL reconstruction a viable option in multiligament knee injuries? Weber AE; Bissell B; Wojtys EM; Sekiya JK Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Sep; 472(9):2667-79. PubMed ID: 25048278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transtibial versus tibial inlay techniques for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: long-term follow-up study. Song EK; Park HW; Ahn YS; Seon JK Am J Sports Med; 2014 Dec; 42(12):2964-71. PubMed ID: 25288624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of tibial inlay versus transtibial techniques for isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: minimum 2-year follow-up. MacGillivray JD; Stein BE; Park M; Allen AA; Wickiewicz TL; Warren RF Arthroscopy; 2006 Mar; 22(3):320-8. PubMed ID: 16517317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using single-bundle patella tendon graft with tibial inlay fixation: 2- to 10-year follow-up. Cooper DE; Stewart D Am J Sports Med; 2004 Mar; 32(2):346-60. PubMed ID: 14977658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. No Clinically Important Difference in Knee Scores or Instability Between Transtibial and Inlay Techniques for PCL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review. Shin YS; Kim HJ; Lee DH Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Apr; 475(4):1239-1248. PubMed ID: 27896678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Arthroscopically assisted combined anterior and posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the multiple ligament injured knee: 2- to 10-year follow-up. Fanelli GC; Edson CJ Arthroscopy; 2002 Sep; 18(7):703-14. PubMed ID: 12209427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Open tibial inlay versus arthroscopic transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Panchal HB; Sekiya JK Arthroscopy; 2011 Sep; 27(9):1289-95. PubMed ID: 21831568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. All-Inside PCL Reconstruction. Therrien E; Pareek A; Song BM; Wilbur RR; Stuart MJ; Levy BA J Knee Surg; 2021 Apr; 34(5):472-477. PubMed ID: 33545733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the Multiple Ligament Injured Knee. Kew ME; Miller MD J Knee Surg; 2020 May; 33(5):421-430. PubMed ID: 31905416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reconstruction of isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries: a clinical comparison of the transtibial and tibial inlay techniques. Seon JK; Song EK Arthroscopy; 2006 Jan; 22(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 16399457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the clinical results of three posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques: surgical technique. Kim SJ; Kim SH; Kim SG; Kung YP J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Sep; 92 Suppl 1 Pt 2():145-57. PubMed ID: 20844171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction via tibial inlay technique in multiligament knee injuries. Zehir S; Elmalı N; Şahin E; Çalbıyık M; Karakaplan M; Taşdemir Z Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2015; 49(6):579-85. PubMed ID: 26511682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the clinical results of three posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques. Kim SJ; Kim TE; Jo SB; Kung YP J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Nov; 91(11):2543-9. PubMed ID: 19884425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of a double bundle arthroscopic inlay and open inlay posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using clinically relevant tools: a cadaveric study. Zehms CT; Whiddon DR; Miller MD; Quinby JS; Montgomery SL; Campbell RB; Sekiya JK Arthroscopy; 2008 Apr; 24(4):472-80. PubMed ID: 18375281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Transtibial or Tibial Inlay Techniques: A Meta-analysis of Biomechanical and Clinical Outcomes. Lee DY; Kim DH; Kim HJ; Ahn HS; Lee TH; Hwang SC Am J Sports Med; 2018 Sep; 46(11):2789-2797. PubMed ID: 29328888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Midterm Clinical Outcome of Combined Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Posterolateral Corner Surgery Using Second-Look Arthroscopic "Lateral Gutter Drive-Through" Test as an Adjunctive Evaluation. Li Y; Hong L; Wang XS; Zhang H; Li X; Zheng T; Feng H Orthop Surg; 2019 Jun; 11(3):422-430. PubMed ID: 31243923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]