284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33813104)
1. No difference in subjective and objective clinical outcomes between arthroscopic transtibial and open inlay posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques in the treatment of multi-ligamentous knee injuries.
Zhang J; Zhang H; Zhang Z; Zheng T; Li Y
Knee; 2021 Jun; 30():18-25. PubMed ID: 33813104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is the all-arthroscopic tibial inlay double-bundle PCL reconstruction a viable option in multiligament knee injuries?
Weber AE; Bissell B; Wojtys EM; Sekiya JK
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Sep; 472(9):2667-79. PubMed ID: 25048278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transtibial versus tibial inlay techniques for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: long-term follow-up study.
Song EK; Park HW; Ahn YS; Seon JK
Am J Sports Med; 2014 Dec; 42(12):2964-71. PubMed ID: 25288624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of tibial inlay versus transtibial techniques for isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: minimum 2-year follow-up.
MacGillivray JD; Stein BE; Park M; Allen AA; Wickiewicz TL; Warren RF
Arthroscopy; 2006 Mar; 22(3):320-8. PubMed ID: 16517317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using single-bundle patella tendon graft with tibial inlay fixation: 2- to 10-year follow-up.
Cooper DE; Stewart D
Am J Sports Med; 2004 Mar; 32(2):346-60. PubMed ID: 14977658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. No Clinically Important Difference in Knee Scores or Instability Between Transtibial and Inlay Techniques for PCL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.
Shin YS; Kim HJ; Lee DH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Apr; 475(4):1239-1248. PubMed ID: 27896678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Arthroscopically assisted combined anterior and posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the multiple ligament injured knee: 2- to 10-year follow-up.
Fanelli GC; Edson CJ
Arthroscopy; 2002 Sep; 18(7):703-14. PubMed ID: 12209427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Open tibial inlay versus arthroscopic transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.
Panchal HB; Sekiya JK
Arthroscopy; 2011 Sep; 27(9):1289-95. PubMed ID: 21831568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. All-Inside PCL Reconstruction.
Therrien E; Pareek A; Song BM; Wilbur RR; Stuart MJ; Levy BA
J Knee Surg; 2021 Apr; 34(5):472-477. PubMed ID: 33545733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the Multiple Ligament Injured Knee.
Kew ME; Miller MD
J Knee Surg; 2020 May; 33(5):421-430. PubMed ID: 31905416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reconstruction of isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries: a clinical comparison of the transtibial and tibial inlay techniques.
Seon JK; Song EK
Arthroscopy; 2006 Jan; 22(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 16399457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the clinical results of three posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques: surgical technique.
Kim SJ; Kim SH; Kim SG; Kung YP
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Sep; 92 Suppl 1 Pt 2():145-57. PubMed ID: 20844171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction via tibial inlay technique in multiligament knee injuries.
Zehir S; Elmalı N; Şahin E; Çalbıyık M; Karakaplan M; Taşdemir Z
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2015; 49(6):579-85. PubMed ID: 26511682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the clinical results of three posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques.
Kim SJ; Kim TE; Jo SB; Kung YP
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Nov; 91(11):2543-9. PubMed ID: 19884425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transtibial Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
Fanelli GC
J Knee Surg; 2021 Apr; 34(5):486-492. PubMed ID: 33580486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of a double bundle arthroscopic inlay and open inlay posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using clinically relevant tools: a cadaveric study.
Zehms CT; Whiddon DR; Miller MD; Quinby JS; Montgomery SL; Campbell RB; Sekiya JK
Arthroscopy; 2008 Apr; 24(4):472-80. PubMed ID: 18375281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Transtibial or Tibial Inlay Techniques: A Meta-analysis of Biomechanical and Clinical Outcomes.
Lee DY; Kim DH; Kim HJ; Ahn HS; Lee TH; Hwang SC
Am J Sports Med; 2018 Sep; 46(11):2789-2797. PubMed ID: 29328888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Midterm Clinical Outcome of Combined Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Posterolateral Corner Surgery Using Second-Look Arthroscopic "Lateral Gutter Drive-Through" Test as an Adjunctive Evaluation.
Li Y; Hong L; Wang XS; Zhang H; Li X; Zheng T; Feng H
Orthop Surg; 2019 Jun; 11(3):422-430. PubMed ID: 31243923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A novel posteromedial approach for tibial inlay PCL reconstruction in KDIIIM injuries: avoiding prone patient positioning.
Richter D; Wascher DC; Schenck RC
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Sep; 472(9):2680-90. PubMed ID: 24619794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparative analysis of arthroscopic double-bundle versus single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon autograft.
Jain V; Goyal A; Mohindra M; Kumar R; Joshi D; Chaudhary D
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2016 Nov; 136(11):1555-1561. PubMed ID: 27438377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
