221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33814286)
1. Breast-Conserving Surgeries With and Without Cavity Shave Margins Have Different Re-excision Rates and Associated Overall Cost: Institutional and Patient-Driven Decisions for Its Utilization.
Cartagena LC; McGuire K; Zot P; Pillappa R; Idowu M; Robila V
Clin Breast Cancer; 2021 Oct; 21(5):e594-e601. PubMed ID: 33814286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of systematic cavity shave margins in breast-conserving surgery at a large community hospital with a low baseline re-excision rate.
Vetter C; Ashok A; Perez M; Musaad S; Rahimi G; Gohil K; Higham A
Breast J; 2020 Oct; 26(10):1960-1965. PubMed ID: 33078470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Shaves off the Cavity or Specimen in Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer.
Iwai Y; Prigoff JG; Sun L; Wiechmann L; Taback B; Rao R; Ugras SK
J Surg Res; 2022 Sep; 277():296-302. PubMed ID: 35526391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Effect of Lumpectomy and Cavity Shave Margin Status on Recurrence and Survival in Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Abdelsattar JM; Afridi FG; Dai Z; Yousaf N; Seldomridge A; Battin AO; Wen S; Gray D; Marsh JW; Cowher MS; Partin JF; Hazard-Jenkins H; Lupinacci K
Am Surg; 2023 Mar; 89(3):424-433. PubMed ID: 34196595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cavity Shaving Reduces Involved Margins and Reinterventions Without Increasing Costs in Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.
Corsi F; Sorrentino L; Bonzini M; Bossi D; Truffi M; Amadori R; Nebuloni M; Brillat B; Mazzucchelli S
Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Jun; 24(6):1516-1524. PubMed ID: 28116620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Economic Impact of Routine Cavity Margins Versus Standard Partial Mastectomy in Breast Cancer Patients: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Chagpar AB; Horowitz NR; Killelea BK; Tsangaris T; Longley P; Grizzle S; Loftus M; Li F; Butler M; Stavris K; Yao X; Harigopal M; Bossuyt V; Lannin DR; Pusztai L; Davidoff AJ; Gross CP
Ann Surg; 2017 Jan; 265(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 27192352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Circumferential Shaving of the Cavity in Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Chen K; Zhu L; Chen L; Li Q; Li S; Qiu N; Yang Y; Su F; Song E
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Dec; 26(13):4256-4263. PubMed ID: 31429019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Volume of excision and cosmesis with routine cavity shave margins technique.
Mook J; Klein R; Kobbermann A; Unzeitig A; Euhus D; Peng Y; Sarode V; Moldrem A; Leitch AM; Andrews V; Teotia S; Rao R
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Mar; 19(3):886-91. PubMed ID: 21837529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Cavity Shave Margins in Breast Cancer.
Chagpar AB; Killelea BK; Tsangaris TN; Butler M; Stavris K; Li F; Yao X; Bossuyt V; Harigopal M; Lannin DR; Pusztai L; Horowitz NR
N Engl J Med; 2015 Aug; 373(6):503-10. PubMed ID: 26028131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Margins in breast conserving surgery: The financial cost & potential savings associated with the new margin guidelines.
Singer L; Brown E; Lanni T
Breast; 2016 Aug; 28():1-4. PubMed ID: 27161409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does intra-operative margin assessment improve margin status and re-excision rates? A population-based analysis of outcomes in breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ.
Laws A; Brar MS; Bouchard-Fortier A; Leong B; Quan ML
J Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 118(7):1205-1211. PubMed ID: 30293241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?
Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Margin re-excision and local recurrence in invasive breast cancer: A cost analysis using a decision tree model.
Abe SE; Hill JS; Han Y; Walsh K; Symanowski JT; Hadzikadic-Gusic L; Flippo-Morton T; Sarantou T; Forster M; White RL
J Surg Oncol; 2015 Sep; 112(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 26374088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of margin assessment method on positive margin rate and total volume excised.
Moo TA; Choi L; Culpepper C; Olcese C; Heerdt A; Sclafani L; King TA; Reiner AS; Patil S; Brogi E; Morrow M; Van Zee KJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Jan; 21(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 24046114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of consensus guidelines for breast-conserving surgery in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ.
Tremelling A; Aft RL; Cyr AE; Gillanders WE; Glover-Collins K; Herrmann V; Margenthaler JA
Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2022 May; 5(5):e1502. PubMed ID: 34245135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does Mammographic Density have an Impact on the Margin Re-excision Rate After Breast-Conserving Surgery?
Edwards BL; Guidry CA; Larson KN; Novicoff WM; Harvey JA; Schroen AT
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):782-8. PubMed ID: 26471488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Do All Positive Margins in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing a Partial Mastectomy Need to Be Resected?
Chagpar AB; Tsangaris TN; Lannin DR
J Am Coll Surg; 2018 Jul; 227(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 29524664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness of surgeon performed intraoperative specimen ink in breast conservation surgery.
Van Den Bruele AB; Jasra B; Smotherman C; Crandall M; Samiian L
J Surg Res; 2018 Nov; 231():441-447. PubMed ID: 30278966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Resection of Cavity Shave Margins in Stage 0-III Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Breast Conserving Surgery: A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.
Dupont E; Tsangaris T; Garcia-Cantu C; Howard-McNatt M; Chiba A; Berger AC; Levine EA; Gass JS; Gallagher K; Lum SS; Martinez RD; Willis AI; Pandya SV; Brown EA; Fenton A; Mendiola A; Murray M; Solomon NL; Senthil M; Ollila DW; Edmonson D; Lazar M; Namm JP; Li F; Butler M; McGowan NE; Herrera ME; Avitan YP; Yoder B; Walters LL; McPartland T; Chagpar AB
Ann Surg; 2021 May; 273(5):876-881. PubMed ID: 31290763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Excising Additional Margins at Initial Breast-Conserving Surgery (BCS) Reduces the Need for Re-excision in a Predominantly African American Population: A Report of a Randomized Prospective Study in a Public Hospital.
Jones V; Linebarger J; Perez S; Gabram S; Okoli J; Bumpers H; Burns B; Mosunjac M; Rizzo M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Feb; 23(2):456-64. PubMed ID: 26254169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
