These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33814723)
1. Life cycle assessment of single-use surgical and embedded filtration layer (EFL) reusable face mask. Lee AWL; Neo ERK; Khoo ZY; Yeo Z; Tan YS; Chng S; Yan W; Lok BK; Low JSC Resour Conserv Recycl; 2021 Jul; 170():105580. PubMed ID: 33814723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact and effectiveness of the general public wearing masks to reduce the spread of pandemics in the UK: a multidisciplinary comparison of single-use masks versus reusable face masks. Allison AL; Ambrose-Dempster E; Bawn M; Arredondo MC; Chau C; Chandler K; Dobrijevic D; Aparasi TD; Hailes HC; Lettieri P; Liu C; Medda F; Michie S; Miodownik M; Munro B; Purkiss D; Ward JM UCL Open Environ; 2021; 3():e022. PubMed ID: 37228803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reconciling human health with the environment while struggling against the COVID-19 pandemic through improved face mask eco-design. Morone P; Yilan G; Imbert E; Becchetti L Sci Rep; 2022 Feb; 12(1):2445. PubMed ID: 35165351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Carbon footprint assessment of face masks in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: Based on different protective performance and applicable scenarios. Luo Y; Yu M; Wu X; Ding X; Wang L J Clean Prod; 2023 Feb; 387():135854. PubMed ID: 36619699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Environmental implication of personal protection equipment in the pandemic era: LCA comparison of face masks typologies. Rodríguez NB; Formentini G; Favi C; Marconi M Procedia CIRP; 2021; 98():306-311. PubMed ID: 33723504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Life cycle assessment and circularity evaluation of the non-medical masks in the Covid-19 pandemic: a Brazilian case. Maceno MMC; João S; Voltolini DR; Zattar IC Environ Dev Sustain; 2022 May; ():1-28. PubMed ID: 35571996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A life cycle assessment of reprocessing face masks during the Covid-19 pandemic. van Straten B; Ligtelijn S; Droog L; Putman E; Dankelman J; Weiland NHS; Horeman T Sci Rep; 2021 Sep; 11(1):17680. PubMed ID: 34480045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Environmental footprints of disposable and reusable personal protective equipment ‒ a product life cycle approach for body coveralls. Snigdha ; Hiloidhari M; Bandyopadhyay S J Clean Prod; 2023 Mar; 394():136166. PubMed ID: 36721728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Developing a carbon footprint model and environmental impact analysis of municipal solid waste transportation: A case study of Tehran, Iran. Rouhi K; Shafiepour Motlagh M; Dalir F J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2023 Dec; 73(12):890-901. PubMed ID: 37843987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does reusable mean green? Comparison of the environmental impact of reusable operating room bed covers and lift sheets versus single-use. Chang JH; Woo KP; Silva de Souza Lima Cano N; Bilec MM; Camhi M; Melnyk AI; Gross A; Walsh RM; Asfaw SH; Gordon IO; Miller BT Surgeon; 2024 Aug; 22(4):236-241. PubMed ID: 38862376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative life cycle assessment of disposable and reusable laryngeal mask airways. Eckelman M; Mosher M; Gonzalez A; Sherman J Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1067-72. PubMed ID: 22492190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Life Cycle Assessment of Reusable and Disposable Cystoscopes: A Path to Greener Urological Procedures. Baboudjian M; Pradere B; Martin N; Gondran-Tellier B; Angerri O; Boucheron T; Bastide C; Emiliani E; Misrai V; Breda A; Lechevallier E Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Jul; 9(4):681-687. PubMed ID: 36543725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Environmental challenges induced by extensive use of face masks during COVID-19: A review and potential solutions. Selvaranjan K; Navaratnam S; Rajeev P; Ravintherakumaran N Environ Chall (Amst); 2021 Apr; 3():100039. PubMed ID: 38620606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fabrication of a High-Performance and Reusable Planar Face Mask in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Hu S; Tian H; Zhang S; Wang D; Gong G; Yue W; Liu K; Hong S; Wang R; Yuan Q; Lu Y; Wang D; Zhang L; Chen J Engineering (Beijing); 2022 Feb; 9():101-110. PubMed ID: 34745685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The planetary health effects of COVID-19 in dental care: a life cycle assessment approach. Almutairi W; Saget S; Mc Donnell J; Tarnowski A; Johnstone M; Duane B Br Dent J; 2022 Aug; 233(4):309-316. PubMed ID: 36028696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance Comparison of Single and Double Masks: Filtration Efficiencies, Breathing Resistance and CO Htwe YZN; Mamat H; Osman B; Mahmud H Arab J Sci Eng; 2022 Apr; ():1-9. PubMed ID: 35402141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Face masks. Technical, technological and functional characteristics and hygienic-sanitary aspects related to the use of filtering mask in the community. Santarsiero A; Ciambelli P; Donsì G; Quadrini F; Briancesco R; D'Alessandro D; Fara GM Ann Ig; 2020; 32(5):472-520. PubMed ID: 32744582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Flexible Nanoporous Template for the Design and Development of Reusable Anti-COVID-19 Hydrophobic Face Masks. El-Atab N; Qaiser N; Badghaish H; Shaikh SF; Hussain MM ACS Nano; 2020 Jun; 14(6):7659-7665. PubMed ID: 32432461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An insight into the benefits of substituting polypropylene with biodegradable polylactic acid face masks for combating environmental emissions. Lyu L; Peng H; An C; Sun H; Yang X; Bi H Sci Total Environ; 2023 Dec; 905():167137. PubMed ID: 37734618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The environmental impacts of different mask options for healthcare settings in the UK. Chau C; Paulillo A; Ho J; Bowen R; La Porta A; Lettieri P Sustain Prod Consum; 2022 Sep; 33():271-282. PubMed ID: 35847564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]