These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33815190)

  • 1. Improving the Precision of Ability Estimates Using Time-On-Task Variables: Insights From the PISA 2012 Computer-Based Assessment of Mathematics.
    Reis Costa D; Bolsinova M; Tijmstra J; Andersson B
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():579128. PubMed ID: 33815190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the Treatment of Missing Item Responses in Educational Large-Scale Assessment Data: An Illustrative Simulation Study and a Case Study Using PISA 2018 Mathematics Data.
    Robitzsch A
    Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ; 2021 Dec; 11(4):1653-1687. PubMed ID: 34940395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of Process Data of PISA 2012 Computer-Based Problem Solving: Application of the Modified Multilevel Mixture IRT Model.
    Liu H; Liu Y; Li M
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1372. PubMed ID: 30123171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Joint Modeling of Compensatory Multidimensional Item Responses and Response Times.
    Man K; Harring JR; Jiao H; Zhan P
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Nov; 43(8):639-654. PubMed ID: 31551641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. International Comparative Study on PISA Mathematics Achievement Test Based on Cognitive Diagnostic Models.
    Wu X; Wu R; Chang HH; Kong Q; Zhang Y
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():2230. PubMed ID: 33013581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Small class sizes for improving student achievement in primary and secondary schools: a systematic review.
    Filges T; Sonne-Schmidt CS; Nielsen BCV
    Campbell Syst Rev; 2018; 14(1):1-107. PubMed ID: 37131395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reanalysis of the German PISA Data: A Comparison of Different Approaches for Trend Estimation With a Particular Emphasis on Mode Effects.
    Robitzsch A; Lüdtke O; Goldhammer F; Kroehne U; Köller O
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():884. PubMed ID: 32528352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the Choice of the Item Response Model for Scaling PISA Data: Model Selection Based on Information Criteria and Quantifying Model Uncertainty.
    Robitzsch A
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 May; 24(6):. PubMed ID: 35741481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Latent Class Analysis of Recurrent Events in Problem-Solving Items.
    Xu H; Fang G; Chen Y; Liu J; Ying Z
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2018 Sep; 42(6):478-498. PubMed ID: 30787489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating Individual Students' Perceptions of Instructional Quality: An Investigation of their Factor Structure, Measurement Invariance, and Relations to Educational Outcomes.
    Scherer R; Nilsen T; Jansen M
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():110. PubMed ID: 26903917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [PISA and the assessment triangle].
    Navas Ara MJ; Urdaneta Durán EJ
    Psicothema; 2011 Nov; 23(4):701-6. PubMed ID: 22047861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictive Feature Generation and Selection Using Process Data From PISA Interactive Problem-Solving Items: An Application of Random Forests.
    Han Z; He Q; von Davier M
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2461. PubMed ID: 31824363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exploring the Multiverse of Analytical Decisions in Scaling Educational Large-Scale Assessment Data: A Specification Curve Analysis for PISA 2018 Mathematics Data.
    Robitzsch A
    Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ; 2022 Jul; 12(7):731-753. PubMed ID: 35877454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of equating methodology on reported trends in PISA.
    Gebhardt E; Adams RJ
    J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(3):305-22. PubMed ID: 17804896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing Attitudes Across Groups: An IRT-Based Item-Fit Statistic for the Analysis of Measurement Invariance.
    Buchholz J; Hartig J
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 May; 43(3):241-250. PubMed ID: 31019359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does the psychoemotional well-being of Spanish students influence their mathematical literacy? An evidence from PISA 2018.
    Molina-Muñoz D; Contreras-García JM; Molina-Portillo E
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1196529. PubMed ID: 37377694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How do american students measure up? Making sense of international comparisons.
    Koretz D
    Future Child; 2009; 19(1):37-51. PubMed ID: 21141704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Significant predictors of mathematical literacy for top-tiered countries/economies, Canada, and the United States on PISA 2012: Case for the sparse regression model.
    Brow MV
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2019 Dec; 89(4):726-749. PubMed ID: 30374953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.