These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33816187)
1. Effect of different reconstruction algorithms on coronary artery calcium scores using the reduced radiation dose protocol: a clinical and phantom study. Pan YK; Sun MH; Wang JJ; Chen XB; Kan XJ; Ge YH; Guo ZP Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2021 Apr; 11(4):1504-1517. PubMed ID: 33816187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Image quality of ct angiography using model-based iterative reconstruction in infants with congenital heart disease: Comparison with filtered back projection and hybrid iterative reconstruction. Jia Q; Zhuang J; Jiang J; Li J; Huang M; Liang C Eur J Radiol; 2017 Jan; 86():190-197. PubMed ID: 28027746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Application of low-tube current with iterative model reconstruction on Philips Brilliance iCT Elite FHD in the accuracy of spinal QCT using a European spine phantom. Wu Y; Jiang Y; Han X; Wang M; Gao J Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2018 Feb; 8(1):32-38. PubMed ID: 29541621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contrast-Enhanced CT with Knowledge-Based Iterative Model Reconstruction for the Evaluation of Parotid Gland Tumors: A Feasibility Study. Park CJ; Kim KW; Lee HJ; Kim MJ; Kim J Korean J Radiol; 2018; 19(5):957-964. PubMed ID: 30174486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Quantitative evaluation of calcium (content) in the coronary artery using hybrid iterative reconstruction (iDose) algorithm on low-dose 64-detector CT: comparison of iDose and filtered back projection]. Murazaki H; Funama Y; Hatemura M; Fujioka C; Tomiguchi S Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(4):360-6. PubMed ID: 21532246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction (IMR) algorithm in ultralow-dose CT for evaluation of urolithiasis: evaluation of radiation dose reduction, image quality, and diagnostic performance. Park SB; Kim YS; Lee JB; Park HJ Abdom Imaging; 2015 Oct; 40(8):3137-46. PubMed ID: 26197735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic efficacy of model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm in an assessment of coronary artery in comparison with standard hybrid-Iterative reconstruction algorithm: dose reduction and image quality. Ippolito D; Riva L; Talei Franzesi CR; Cangiotti C; De Vito A; Di Gennaro F; D'andrea G; Crespi A; Sironi S Radiol Med; 2019 May; 124(5):350-359. PubMed ID: 30539411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of iterative model-based reconstruction versus conventional filtered back projection and hybrid iterative reconstruction techniques: lesion conspicuity and influence of body size in anthropomorphic liver phantoms. Yoon JH; Lee JM; Yu MH; Baek JH; Jeon JH; Hur BY; Dhanantwari A; Chung SY; Han JK; Choi BI J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014; 38(6):859-68. PubMed ID: 25321625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of iterative model reconstruction on coronary artery calcium quantification. Szilveszter B; Elzomor H; Károlyi M; Kolossváry M; Raaijmakers R; Benke K; Celeng C; Bartykowszki A; Bagyura Z; Lux Á; Merkely B; Maurovich-Horvat P Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jan; 32(1):153-60. PubMed ID: 26285899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Image quality evaluation of iterative model reconstruction on low tube voltage (80 kVp) coronary CT angiography in an animal study. Hu MQ; Li M; Liu ZY; Huang MP; Liu H; Liang CH Acta Radiol; 2016 Feb; 57(2):170-7. PubMed ID: 25657261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Value of knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction in low-kV 256-slice coronary CT angiography. Yuki H; Utsunomiya D; Funama Y; Tokuyasu S; Namimoto T; Hirai T; Itatani R; Katahira K; Oshima S; Yamashita Y J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2014; 8(2):115-23. PubMed ID: 24661824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Determination of optimal imaging settings for urolithiasis CT using filtered back projection (FBP), statistical iterative reconstruction (IR) and knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction (IMR): a physical human phantom study. Choi SY; Ahn SH; Choi JD; Kim JH; Lee BI; Kim JI; Park SB Br J Radiol; 2016; 89(1058):20150527. PubMed ID: 26577542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of coronary artery image quality with knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction. Halpern EJ; Gingold EL; White H; Read K Acad Radiol; 2014 Jun; 21(6):805-11. PubMed ID: 24809321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The feasibility of sub-millisievert coronary CT angiography with low tube voltage, prospective ECG gating, and a knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction algorithm. Park CH; Lee J; Oh C; Han KH; Kim TH Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Dec; 31 Suppl 2():197-203. PubMed ID: 26521066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Iterative model reconstruction (IMR) algorithm for reduced radiation dose renal artery CT angiography with different tube voltage protocols. Qin L; Ma Z; Yan F; Yang W Radiol Med; 2018 Feb; 123(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 29058232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Iterative Model Reconstruction (IMR) in MDCT Below 2 mSv for the Detection of Urinary Calculi: Diagnostic Accuracy and Image Quality in Comparison to Filtered Back-Projection and 4th Generation Iterative Reconstruction (iDose4). Schmidt-Holtz J; Laqmani A; Butscheidt S; Kurfürst M; Avanesov M; Behzadi C; Spink C; Veldhoen S; Nagel HD; Adam G; Regier M Rofo; 2018 Jul; 190(7):630-636. PubMed ID: 29966156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction for CT Volumetry of Part-Solid Nodules and Solid Nodules in Comparison with Filtered Back Projection and Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction at Various Dose Settings: An Anthropomorphic Chest Phantom Study. Kim SK; Kim C; Lee KY; Cha J; Lim HJ; Kang EY; Oh YW Korean J Radiol; 2019 Jul; 20(7):1195-1206. PubMed ID: 31270983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of ground-glass opacities by use of hybrid iterative reconstruction (iDose) and low-dose 256-section computed tomography: a phantom study. Higuchi K; Nagao M; Matsuo Y; Sunami S; Kamitani T; Jinnouchi M; Yonezawa M; Yamasaki Y; Yabuuchi H; Hatkenaka M; Honda H Radiol Phys Technol; 2013 Jul; 6(2):299-304. PubMed ID: 23400447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dose reduction for coronary calcium scoring with hybrid and model-based iterative reconstruction: an ex vivo study. den Harder AM; Willemink MJ; Bleys RL; de Jong PA; Budde RP; Schilham AM; Leiner T Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Aug; 30(6):1125-33. PubMed ID: 24794292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]