199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33816253)
1. Complementing Prostate SBRT VMAT With a Two-Beam Non-Coplanar IMRT Class Solution to Enhance Rectum and Bladder Sparing With Minimum Increase in Treatment Time.
Sharfo AWM; Rossi L; Dirkx MLP; Breedveld S; Aluwini S; Heijmen BJM
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():620978. PubMed ID: 33816253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automated multi-criterial planning with beam angle optimization to establish non-coplanar VMAT class solutions for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Leitão J; Bijman R; Wahab Sharfo A; Brus Y; Rossi L; Breedveld S; Heijmen B
Phys Med; 2022 Sep; 101():20-27. PubMed ID: 35853387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. VMAT plus a few computer-optimized non-coplanar IMRT beams (VMAT+) tested for liver SBRT.
Sharfo AW; Dirkx ML; Breedveld S; Méndez Romero A; Heijmen BJ
Radiother Oncol; 2017 Apr; 123(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 28341061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. On the beam direction search space in computerized non-coplanar beam angle optimization for IMRT-prostate SBRT.
Rossi L; Breedveld S; Heijmen BJ; Voet PW; Lanconelli N; Aluwini S
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Sep; 57(17):5441-58. PubMed ID: 22864234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Off-target-isocentric approach in non-coplanar Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) planning for lung SBRT treatments.
Kim S; Tseng TC
J Radiosurg SBRT; 2015; 3(3):215-224. PubMed ID: 29296404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Per-fraction planning to enhance optimization degrees of freedom compared to the conventional single-plan approach.
Rossi L; Breedveld S; Heijmen B
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Aug; 68(17):. PubMed ID: 37524087
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Dosimetrically motivated beam-angle optimization for non-coplanar arc radiotherapy with and without dynamic collimator rotation.
Bertholet J; Zhu C; Guyer G; Mueller S; Volken W; Mackeprang PH; Loebner HA; Stampanoni MFM; Aebersold DM; Fix MK; Manser P
Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):1326-1339. PubMed ID: 38131614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. SU-E-T-647: Plan Quality in Computerized Non-Coplanar IMRT Beam Angle Optimization is Highly Dependent on the Extent of the Beam direction Search Space.
Voet P; Rossi L; Breedveld S; Aluwini S; Heijmen B
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part20):3855. PubMed ID: 28517519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A dosimetric comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and non-coplanar intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for nasal cavity and paranasal sinus cancer.
Jeong Y; Lee SW; Kwak J; Cho I; Yoon SM; Kim JH; Park JH; Choi EK; Song SY; Kim YS; Kim SS; Joo JH; Ahn SD
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Aug; 9():193. PubMed ID: 25175383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On the Importance of Individualized, Non-Coplanar Beam Configurations in Mediastinal Lymphoma Radiotherapy, Optimized With Automated Planning.
Rossi L; Cambraia Lopes P; Marques Leitão J; Janus C; van de Pol M; Breedveld S; Penninkhof J; Heijmen BJM
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():619929. PubMed ID: 33937025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of non-coplanar optimization of static beams and arc trajectories for intensity-modulated treatments of meningioma cases.
Ventura T; Rocha H; da Costa Ferreira B; Dias J; do Carmo Lopes M
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2021 Dec; 44(4):1273-1283. PubMed ID: 34618329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Noncoplanar VMAT for nasopharyngeal tumors: Plan quality versus treatment time.
Wild E; Bangert M; Nill S; Oelfke U
Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2157-68. PubMed ID: 25979010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Treatment planning comparison of IMPT, VMAT and 4π radiotherapy for prostate cases.
Tran A; Zhang J; Woods K; Yu V; Nguyen D; Gustafson G; Rosen L; Sheng K
Radiat Oncol; 2017 Jan; 12(1):10. PubMed ID: 28077128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A dosimetric comparison of the use of equally spaced beam (ESB), beam angle optimization (BAO), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in head and neck cancers treated by intensity modulated radiotherapy.
Leung WS; Wu VWC; Liu CYW; Cheng ACK
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 20(11):121-130. PubMed ID: 31593367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automated generation of IMRT treatment plans for prostate cancer patients with metal hip prostheses: comparison of different planning strategies.
Voet PW; Dirkx ML; Breedveld S; Heijmen BJ
Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):071704. PubMed ID: 23822408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy, coplanar volumetric-modulated arc, therapy, and noncoplanar volumetric-modulated arc therapy in, glioblastoma: A dosimetric comparison.
Hou Y; Zhang Y; Liu Z; Yv L; Liu K; Tian X; Lv Y
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2019 Dec; 187():105573. PubMed ID: 31706107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Coplanar versus noncoplanar intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment planning for fronto-temporal high-grade glioma.
Panet-Raymond V; Ansbacher W; Zavgorodni S; Bendorffe B; Nichol A; Truong PT; Beckham W; Vlachaki M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 13(4):3826. PubMed ID: 22766954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy for the treatment of a large planning target volume in thoracic esophageal cancer.
Abbas AS; Moseley D; Kassam Z; Kim SM; Cho C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 May; 14(3):4269. PubMed ID: 23652258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modeling the target dose fall-off in IMRT and VMAT planning techniques for cervical SBRT.
Brito Delgado A; Cohen D; Eng TY; Stanley DN; Shi Z; Charlton M; Gutiérrez AN
Med Dosim; 2018 Spring; 43(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 29223302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. SU-E-T-574: Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Prostate Radiation: A Dosimetric Comparison between VMAT Techniques and Fixed-Beam IMRT.
Qi S; Liu R; Lian J; Hu A; Song H
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part19):3837-3838. PubMed ID: 28517067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
