These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33816958)

  • 1. A machine learning framework for the prediction of chromatin folding in
    Rozenwald MB; Galitsyna AA; Sapunov GV; Khrameeva EE; Gelfand MS
    PeerJ Comput Sci; 2020; 6():e307. PubMed ID: 33816958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. StackTADB: a stacking-based ensemble learning model for predicting the boundaries of topologically associating domains (TADs) accurately in fruit flies.
    Wu H; Zhang P; Ai Z; Wei L; Zhang H; Yang F; Cui L
    Brief Bioinform; 2022 Mar; 23(2):. PubMed ID: 35181793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. ClusterTAD: an unsupervised machine learning approach to detecting topologically associated domains of chromosomes from Hi-C data.
    Oluwadare O; Cheng J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Nov; 18(1):480. PubMed ID: 29137603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Active chromatin and transcription play a key role in chromosome partitioning into topologically associating domains.
    Ulianov SV; Khrameeva EE; Gavrilov AA; Flyamer IM; Kos P; Mikhaleva EA; Penin AA; Logacheva MD; Imakaev MV; Chertovich A; Gelfand MS; Shevelyov YY; Razin SV
    Genome Res; 2016 Jan; 26(1):70-84. PubMed ID: 26518482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exploring the 2D and 3D structural properties of topologically associating domains.
    Liu T; Wang Z
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Dec; 20(Suppl 16):592. PubMed ID: 31787081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of topologically associating domain callers over mammals at high resolution.
    Sefer E
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Apr; 23(1):127. PubMed ID: 35413815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Structural basis for the preservation of a subset of topologically associating domains in interphase chromosomes upon cohesin depletion.
    Jeong D; Shi G; Li X; Thirumalai D
    Elife; 2024 Mar; 12():. PubMed ID: 38502563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methods for the Analysis of Topologically Associating Domains (TADs).
    Zufferey M; Tavernari D; Ciriello G
    Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2301():39-59. PubMed ID: 34415530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MrTADFinder: A network modularity based approach to identify topologically associating domains in multiple resolutions.
    Yan KK; Lou S; Gerstein M
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Jul; 13(7):e1005647. PubMed ID: 28742097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of computational methods for the identification of topologically associating domains.
    Zufferey M; Tavernari D; Oricchio E; Ciriello G
    Genome Biol; 2018 Dec; 19(1):217. PubMed ID: 30526631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reciprocal insulation analysis of Hi-C data shows that TADs represent a functionally but not structurally privileged scale in the hierarchical folding of chromosomes.
    Zhan Y; Mariani L; Barozzi I; Schulz EG; Blüthgen N; Stadler M; Tiana G; Giorgetti L
    Genome Res; 2017 Mar; 27(3):479-490. PubMed ID: 28057745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. PredTAD: A machine learning framework that models 3D chromatin organization alterations leading to oncogene dysregulation in breast cancer cell lines.
    Chyr J; Zhang Z; Chen X; Zhou X
    Comput Struct Biotechnol J; 2021; 19():2870-2880. PubMed ID: 34093998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 5C analysis of the Epidermal Differentiation Complex locus reveals distinct chromatin interaction networks between gene-rich and gene-poor TADs in skin epithelial cells.
    Poterlowicz K; Yarker JL; Malashchuk I; Lajoie BR; Mardaryev AN; Gdula MR; Sharov AA; Kohwi-Shigematsu T; Botchkarev VA; Fessing MY
    PLoS Genet; 2017 Sep; 13(9):e1006966. PubMed ID: 28863138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. TADs are 3D structural units of higher-order chromosome organization in
    Szabo Q; Jost D; Chang JM; Cattoni DI; Papadopoulos GL; Bonev B; Sexton T; Gurgo J; Jacquier C; Nollmann M; Bantignies F; Cavalli G
    Sci Adv; 2018 Feb; 4(2):eaar8082. PubMed ID: 29503869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A computational method to predict topologically associating domain boundaries combining histone Marks and sequence information.
    Gan W; Luo J; Li YZ; Guo JL; Zhu M; Li ML
    BMC Genomics; 2019 Dec; 20(Suppl 13):980. PubMed ID: 31881832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative differences in TAD border strength underly the TAD hierarchy in Drosophila chromosomes.
    Luzhin AV; Flyamer IM; Khrameeva EE; Ulianov SV; Razin SV; Gavrilov AA
    J Cell Biochem; 2019 Mar; 120(3):4494-4503. PubMed ID: 30260021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Semi-nonparametric modeling of topological domain formation from epigenetic data.
    Sefer E; Kingsford C
    Algorithms Mol Biol; 2019; 14():4. PubMed ID: 30867673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. TADfit is a multivariate linear regression model for profiling hierarchical chromatin domains on replicate Hi-C data.
    Liu E; Lyu H; Peng Q; Liu Y; Wang T; Han J
    Commun Biol; 2022 Jun; 5(1):608. PubMed ID: 35725901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sub-kb Hi-C in D. melanogaster reveals conserved characteristics of TADs between insect and mammalian cells.
    Wang Q; Sun Q; Czajkowsky DM; Shao Z
    Nat Commun; 2018 Jan; 9(1):188. PubMed ID: 29335463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ProbC: joint modeling of epigenome and transcriptome effects in 3D genome.
    Sefer E
    BMC Genomics; 2022 Apr; 23(1):287. PubMed ID: 35397520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.