These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33817355)

  • 1. Reprotech in France and the United States: Comparisons, reproductive technology and migrapolitics.
    Thompson C
    Reprod Biomed Soc Online; 2020 Nov; 11():104-105. PubMed ID: 33817355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reprotech in France and the United States: Differences and similarities - An introduction.
    Mathieu S; Rapp R
    Reprod Biomed Soc Online; 2020 Nov; 11():106-109. PubMed ID: 33817356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. And baby makes three--or four, or five, or six: redefining the family after the reprotech revolution.
    Charo RA
    Wis Womens Law J; 1992-1993; 7-8():1-23. PubMed ID: 16617536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. France and the United States: the legal and ethical differences in assisted reproductive technology (ART).
    McGregor J; Dreifuss-Netter F
    Med Law; 2007 Mar; 26(1):117-35. PubMed ID: 17511414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Controversial "reprotech" royal commission faces growing criticism.
    Gray C
    CMAJ; 1991 Nov; 145(10):1371-2. PubMed ID: 11653961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Managing medical technology: lessons for the United States from Quebec and France.
    Rosenau PV
    Int J Health Serv; 2000; 30(3):617-39. PubMed ID: 11109185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of extreme prematurity and congenital anomalies on the interpretation of international comparisons of infant mortality.
    Sachs BP; Fretts RC; Gardner R; Hellerstein S; Wampler NS; Wise PH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 85(6):941-6. PubMed ID: 7770264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Socioeconomic Segregation in Large Cities in France and the United States.
    Quillian L; Lagrange H
    Demography; 2016 Aug; 53(4):1051-84. PubMed ID: 27393232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assisted reproductive technology (ART) in the United States: towards a national regulatory framework?
    Merchant J
    J Int Bioethique; 2009 Dec; 20(4):55-71, 109-10. PubMed ID: 20648936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Health behavior changes in the United States, the United Kingdom, and France.
    Retchin SM; Wells JA; Valleron AJ; Albrecht GL
    J Gen Intern Med; 1992; 7(6):615-22. PubMed ID: 1453245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Socioeconomic disadvantage and adolescent women's sexual and reproductive behavior: the case of five developed countries.
    Singh S; Darroch JE; Frost JJ
    Fam Plann Perspect; 2001; 33(6):251-8, 289. PubMed ID: 11804434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Why France Spends Less Than the United States on Drugs: A Comparative Study of Drug Pricing and Pricing Regulation.
    Raimond VC; Feldman WB; Rome BN; Kesselheim AS
    Milbank Q; 2021 Mar; 99(1):240-272. PubMed ID: 33751664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The American Democratic Deficit in Assisted Reproductive Technology Innovation.
    Lewis MS
    Am J Law Med; 2019 May; 45(2-3):130-170. PubMed ID: 31722626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Assisted reproduction. Rules and laws. International comparisons].
    Cohen J; Jones H
    Contracept Fertil Sex; 1999 Apr; 27(4):I-VII. PubMed ID: 10349777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Survival after the age of 80 in the United States, Sweden, France, England, and Japan.
    Manton KG; Vaupel JW
    N Engl J Med; 1995 Nov; 333(18):1232-5. PubMed ID: 7565998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2000.
    Wright VC; Schieve LA; Reynolds MA; Jeng G
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2003 Aug; 52(9):1-16. PubMed ID: 14532867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2001.
    Wright VC; Schieve LA; Reynolds MA; Jeng G; Kissin D
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2004 Apr; 53(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 15123982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of insurance mandates on donor oocyte utilization: an analysis of 39,338 donor oocyte cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry.
    George JS; Lee MS; Ashby RK; Goldman R; Ginsburg ES; Lanes A; Srouji SS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Dec; 227(6):877.e1-877.e11. PubMed ID: 35863456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Privacy, autonomy, and public policy: French and North American perspectives.
    Merchant J
    Theor Med Bioeth; 2016 Dec; 37(6):503-516. PubMed ID: 27909857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Treatment of psychotic disorders in the United States and France: three comparisons.
    Kowalski S; Lewis L; Maldonado M
    Bull Menninger Clin; 1995; 59(3):385-92. PubMed ID: 7550062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.