These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33818263)
1. EAS-Combined electric and acoustic stimulation. Dhanasingh A; Hochmair I Acta Otolaryngol; 2021 Mar; 141(sup1):22-62. PubMed ID: 33818263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects. Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hearing Preservation Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation Depending on the Angle of Insertion: Indication for Electric or Electric-Acoustic Stimulation. Helbig S; Adel Y; Leinung M; Stöver T; Baumann U; Weissgerber T Otol Neurotol; 2018 Aug; 39(7):834-841. PubMed ID: 29912820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Chronic Electro-Acoustic Stimulation May Interfere With Electric Threshold Recovery After Cochlear Implantation in the Aged Guinea Pig. Reiss LAJ; Lawrence MB; Omelchenko IA; He W; Kirk JR Ear Hear; 2024 Nov-Dec 01; 45(6):1554-1567. PubMed ID: 38992863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Combined electric acoustic stimulation with the PULSARCI(100) implant system using the FLEX(EAS) electrode array. Helbig S; Van de Heyning P; Kiefer J; Baumann U; Kleine-Punte A; Brockmeier H; Anderson I; Gstoettner W Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Jun; 131(6):585-95. PubMed ID: 21281057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Acceptance and Benefits of Electro-Acoustic Stimulation for Conventional-Length Electrode Arrays. Spitzer ER; Waltzman SB; Landsberger DM; Friedmann DR Audiol Neurootol; 2021; 26(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 32721977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bilateral electric acoustic stimulation: a comparison of partial and deep cochlear electrode insertion. A longitudinal case study. Kleine Punte A; Vermeire K; Van de Heyning P Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2010; 67():144-152. PubMed ID: 19955731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Longitudinal Electrocochleography as an Objective Measure of Serial Behavioral Audiometry in Electro-Acoustic Stimulation Patients. Tejani VD; Kim JS; Etler CP; Skidmore J; Yuan Y; He S; Hansen MR; Gantz BJ; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ Ear Hear; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 44(5):1014-1028. PubMed ID: 36790447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electric-Acoustic Stimulation After Reimplantation: Hearing Preservation and Speech Perception. Thompson NJ; Dillon MT; Bucker AL; King ER; Pillsbury HC; Brown KD Otol Neurotol; 2019 Feb; 40(2):e94-e98. PubMed ID: 30624400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Phantom Stimulation for Cochlear Implant Users With Residual Low-Frequency Hearing. Krüger B; Büchner A; Nogueira W Ear Hear; 2022; 43(2):631-645. PubMed ID: 34593687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new combined speech processor for electric and acoustic stimulation--eight months experience. Helbig S; Baumann U; Helbig M; von Malsen-Waldkirch N; Gstoettner W ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2008; 70(6):359-65. PubMed ID: 18984971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term residual hearing in cochlear implanted adult patients who were candidates for electro-acoustic stimulation. Mamelle E; Granger B; Sterkers O; Lahlou G; Ferrary E; Nguyen Y; Mosnier I Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Mar; 277(3):705-713. PubMed ID: 31802226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Psychoacoustic and electrophysiological electric-acoustic interaction effects in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing. Imsiecke M; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W Hear Res; 2020 Feb; 386():107873. PubMed ID: 31884220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Speech Perception With Combined Electric-Acoustic Stimulation: A Simulation and Model Comparison. Rader T; Adel Y; Fastl H; Baumann U Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):e314-25. PubMed ID: 25989069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multicenter US Clinical Trial With an Electric-Acoustic Stimulation (EAS) System in Adults: Final Outcomes. Pillsbury HC; Dillon MT; Buchman CA; Staecker H; Prentiss SM; Ruckenstein MJ; Bigelow DC; Telischi FF; Martinez DM; Runge CL; Friedland DR; Blevins NH; Larky JB; Alexiades G; Kaylie DM; Roland PS; Miyamoto RT; Backous DD; Warren FM; El-Kashlan HK; Slager HK; Reyes C; Racey AI; Adunka OF Otol Neurotol; 2018 Mar; 39(3):299-305. PubMed ID: 29342054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electric acoustic stimulation (EAS) with the Naída CI Q90 sound processor in experienced cochlear implant users. Battmer RD; Scholz S; Geissler G; Ernst A Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Nov; 20(6):331-340. PubMed ID: 31464168 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Usami S-I et al. - Hearing preservation and clinical outcome of 32 consecutive electric acoustic stimulation (EAS) surgeries. Acta Oto-Laryngol 2014; 134: 717-727. Hellström S Acta Otolaryngol; 2018 Mar; 138(3):317-328. PubMed ID: 29532722 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Acceptance and fitting of the DUET device - a combined speech processor for electric acoustic stimulation. Helbig S; Baumann U Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2010; 67():81-87. PubMed ID: 19955724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: a review of the first decade. von Ilberg CA; Baumann U; Kiefer J; Tillein J; Adunka OF Audiol Neurootol; 2011; 16 Suppl 2():1-30. PubMed ID: 21606646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]