These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33818263)

  • 21. Bilateral cochlear implantation.
    Dhanasingh A; Hochmair I
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2021 Mar; 141(sup1):1-21. PubMed ID: 33818259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cochlear implant spectral bandwidth for optimizing electric and acoustic stimulation (EAS).
    Gifford RH; Sunderhaus LW; Dawant BM; Labadie RF; Noble JH
    Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108584. PubMed ID: 35985964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Binaural cue sensitivity in cochlear implant recipients with acoustic hearing preservation.
    Gifford RH; Stecker GC
    Hear Res; 2020 May; 390():107929. PubMed ID: 32182551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Combined electric and acoustic hearing performance with Zebra® speech processor: speech reception, place, and temporal coding evaluation.
    Vaerenberg B; Péan V; Lesbros G; De Ceulaer G; Schauwers K; Daemers K; Gnansia D; Govaerts PJ
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Jun; 14(3):150-7. PubMed ID: 23321588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Impact of Electric Stimulation on Residual Hearing.
    Dillon MT; Bucker AL; Adunka MC; King ER; Adunka OF; Buchman CA; Pillsbury HC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Sep; 26(8):732-740. PubMed ID: 26333881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Frequency-to-Place Mismatch: Characterizing Variability and the Influence on Speech Perception Outcomes in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Canfarotta MW; Dillon MT; Buss E; Pillsbury HC; Brown KD; O'Connell BP
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1349-1361. PubMed ID: 32205726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Electric-acoustic stimulation with longer electrodes for potential deterioration in low-frequency hearing.
    Yoshimura H; Moteki H; Nishio SY; Usami SI
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2020 Aug; 140(8):632-638. PubMed ID: 32498646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Simultaneous masking between electric and acoustic stimulation in cochlear implant users with residual low-frequency hearing.
    Krüger B; Büchner A; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():185-196. PubMed ID: 28688755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Pitch matching psychometrics in electric acoustic stimulation.
    Baumann U; Rader T; Helbig S; Bahmer A
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):656-62. PubMed ID: 21869623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Potential Benefits of an Integrated Electric-Acoustic Sound Processor with Children: A Preliminary Report.
    Wolfe J; Neumann S; Schafer E; Marsh M; Wood M; Baker RS
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Feb; 28(2):127-140. PubMed ID: 28240980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of hearing aid settings for electric-acoustic stimulation.
    Dillon MT; Buss E; Pillsbury HC; Adunka OF; Buchman CA; Adunka MC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 24828214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Hearing preservation in children with electric-acoustic stimulation after cochlear implantation : Outcome after electrode insertion with minimal insertion trauma.
    Rader T; Bohnert A; Matthias C; Koutsimpelas D; Kainz MA; Strieth S
    HNO; 2018 Jul; 66(Suppl 2):56-62. PubMed ID: 30132125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Outcomes in Children.
    Park LR; Teagle HFB; Gagnon E; Woodard J; Brown KD
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):849-857. PubMed ID: 30252685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Hearing preservation in cochlear implantation for electric acoustic stimulation.
    Gstoettner W; Kiefer J; Baumgartner WD; Pok S; Peters S; Adunka O
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 May; 124(4):348-52. PubMed ID: 15224851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. ACEMg-mediated hearing preservation in cochlear implant patients receiving different electrode lengths (PROHEARING): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Scheper V; Leifholz M; von der Leyen H; Keller M; Denkena U; Koch A; Karch A; Miller J; Lenarz T
    Trials; 2016 Aug; 17():394. PubMed ID: 27502589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Interaction Between Electric and Acoustic Stimulation Influences Speech Perception in Ipsilateral EAS Users.
    Imsiecke M; Krüger B; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):868-882. PubMed ID: 31592902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Amplitude Growth Functions of Auditory Nerve Responses to Electric Pulse Stimulation With Varied Interphase Gaps in Cochlear Implant Users With Ipsilateral Residual Hearing.
    Imsiecke M; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211014137. PubMed ID: 34181493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Optimizing maps for electric acoustic stimulation users.
    Yoon YS; Shin YR; Kim JM; Coltisor A; Chun YM
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 May; 20(3):106-115. PubMed ID: 30694120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.