284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33819276)
1. Instrumental variable estimation of truncated local average treatment effects.
Choi BY
PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0249642. PubMed ID: 33819276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Profiling compliers and noncompliers for instrumental variable analysis with covariates: A weighting approach.
Choi BY
PLoS One; 2023; 18(6):e0283223. PubMed ID: 37319247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing causal treatment effect estimation when using large observational datasets.
John ER; Abrams KR; Brightling CE; Sheehan NA
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):207. PubMed ID: 31726969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Instrumental variable estimation of the causal hazard ratio.
Wang L; Tchetgen Tchetgen E; Martinussen T; Vansteelandt S
Biometrics; 2023 Jun; 79(2):539-550. PubMed ID: 36377509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Simple efficient bias corrected instrumental variable estimator for randomized trials with noncompliance.
Chan KC
Contemp Clin Trials; 2012 Jul; 33(4):786-93. PubMed ID: 22484340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mendelian randomization mixed-scale treatment effect robust identification and estimation for causal inference.
Liu Z; Ye T; Sun B; Schooling M; Tchetgen ET
Biometrics; 2023 Sep; 79(3):2208-2219. PubMed ID: 35950778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Unifying instrumental variable and inverse probability weighting approaches for inference of causal treatment effect and unmeasured confounding in observational studies.
Liu T; Hogan JW
Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Mar; 30(3):671-686. PubMed ID: 33213292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sensitivity analyses for average treatment effects when outcome is censored by death in instrumental variable models.
Lee K; Lorch SA; Small DS
Stat Med; 2019 Jun; 38(13):2303-2316. PubMed ID: 30785641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating possible confounding by prescriber in comparative effectiveness research.
Franklin JM; Schneeweiss S; Huybrechts KF; Glynn RJ
Epidemiology; 2015 Mar; 26(2):238-41. PubMed ID: 25643103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Should a propensity score model be super? The utility of ensemble procedures for causal adjustment.
Alam S; Moodie EEM; Stephens DA
Stat Med; 2019 Apr; 38(9):1690-1702. PubMed ID: 30586681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. On a preference-based instrumental variable approach in reducing unmeasured confounding-by-indication.
Li Y; Lee Y; Wolfe RA; Morgenstern H; Zhang J; Port FK; Robinson BM
Stat Med; 2015 Mar; 34(7):1150-68. PubMed ID: 25546152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Two-stage instrumental variable methods for estimating the causal odds ratio: analysis of bias.
Cai B; Small DS; Have TR
Stat Med; 2011 Jul; 30(15):1809-24. PubMed ID: 21495062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Time dependent hazard ratio estimation using instrumental variables without conditioning on an omitted covariate.
MacKenzie TA; Martinez-Camblor P; O'Malley AJ
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Mar; 21(1):56. PubMed ID: 33743583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation.
Waernbaum I
Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1572-81. PubMed ID: 22359267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Two-step estimation in ratio-of-mediator-probability weighted causal mediation analysis.
Bein E; Deutsch J; Hong G; Porter KE; Qin X; Yang C
Stat Med; 2018 Apr; 37(8):1304-1324. PubMed ID: 29322536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Instrumental variable methods for causal inference.
Baiocchi M; Cheng J; Small DS
Stat Med; 2014 Jun; 33(13):2297-340. PubMed ID: 24599889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Testing concordance of instrumental variable effects in generalized linear models with application to Mendelian randomization.
Dai JY; Chan KC; Hsu L
Stat Med; 2014 Oct; 33(23):3986-4007. PubMed ID: 24863158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A weighting method for simultaneous adjustment for confounding and joint exposure-outcome misclassifications.
Penning de Vries BB; van Smeden M; Groenwold RH
Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Feb; 30(2):473-487. PubMed ID: 32998668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis approaches to address treatment nonadherence in pragmatic trials with point-treatment settings: a simulation study.
Hossain MB; Mosquera L; Karim ME
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Feb; 22(1):46. PubMed ID: 35172746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bias testing, bias correction, and confounder selection using an instrumental variable model.
Yeob Choi B; Fine JP; Alan Brookhart M
Stat Med; 2020 Dec; 39(29):4386-4404. PubMed ID: 32854161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
