285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33819276)
41. Multiply robust estimation of causal quantile treatment effects.
Xie Y; Cotton C; Zhu Y
Stat Med; 2020 Dec; 39(28):4238-4251. PubMed ID: 32857876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Estimation of the average treatment effect with variable selection and measurement error simultaneously addressed for potential confounders.
Yi GY; Chen LP
Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Apr; 32(4):691-711. PubMed ID: 36694932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Joint mixed-effects models for causal inference with longitudinal data.
Shardell M; Ferrucci L
Stat Med; 2018 Feb; 37(5):829-846. PubMed ID: 29205454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Marginal mean weighting through stratification: a generalized method for evaluating multivalued and multiple treatments with nonexperimental data.
Hong G
Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):44-60. PubMed ID: 21843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. On the joint use of propensity and prognostic scores in estimation of the average treatment effect on the treated: a simulation study.
Leacy FP; Stuart EA
Stat Med; 2014 Sep; 33(20):3488-508. PubMed ID: 24151187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A weighting approach to causal effects and additive interaction in case-control studies: marginal structural linear odds models.
VanderWeele TJ; Vansteelandt S
Am J Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 174(10):1197-203. PubMed ID: 22058231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Strengthening Instrumental Variables Through Weighting.
Lehmann D; Li Y; Saran R; Li Y
Stat Biosci; 2017 Dec; 9(2):320-338. PubMed ID: 31316679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Addressing Extreme Propensity Scores via the Overlap Weights.
Li F; Thomas LE; Li F
Am J Epidemiol; 2019 Jan; 188(1):250-257. PubMed ID: 30189042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Model averaged double robust estimation.
Cefalu M; Dominici F; Arvold N; Parmigiani G
Biometrics; 2017 Jun; 73(2):410-421. PubMed ID: 27893927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Implementation of Instrumental Variable Bounds for Data Missing Not at Random.
Marden JR; Wang L; Tchetgen EJT; Walter S; Glymour MM; Wirth KE
Epidemiology; 2018 May; 29(3):364-368. PubMed ID: 29394191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Improving causal inference with a doubly robust estimator that combines propensity score stratification and weighting.
Linden A
J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Aug; 23(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 28116816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Assessing the impact of unmeasured confounding for binary outcomes using confounding functions.
Kasza J; Wolfe R; Schuster T
Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Aug; 46(4):1303-1311. PubMed ID: 28338913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. A model averaging approach for estimating propensity scores by optimizing balance.
Xie Y; Zhu Y; Cotton CA; Wu P
Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jan; 28(1):84-101. PubMed ID: 28712346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Instrumental Variable Methods for Continuous Outcomes That Accommodate Nonignorable Missing Baseline Values.
Ertefaie A; Flory JH; Hennessy S; Small DS
Am J Epidemiol; 2017 Jun; 185(12):1233-1239. PubMed ID: 28338946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Causal simulation experiments: Lessons from bias amplification.
Stokes T; Steele R; Shrier I
Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 Jan; 31(1):3-46. PubMed ID: 34812681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Bias in estimating the causal hazard ratio when using two-stage instrumental variable methods.
Wan F; Small D; Bekelman JE; Mitra N
Stat Med; 2015 Jun; 34(14):2235-65. PubMed ID: 25800789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Propensity score estimation with missing values using a multiple imputation missingness pattern (MIMP) approach.
Qu Y; Lipkovich I
Stat Med; 2009 Apr; 28(9):1402-14. PubMed ID: 19222021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Too much ado about instrumental variable approach: is the cure worse than the disease?
Baser O
Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1201-9. PubMed ID: 19497084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Estimation of average treatment effect based on a multi-index propensity score.
Xu J; Wei K; Wang C; Huang C; Xue Y; Zhang R; Qin G; Yu Y
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Dec; 22(1):337. PubMed ID: 36577950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. On regression adjustment for the propensity score.
Vansteelandt S; Daniel RM
Stat Med; 2014 Oct; 33(23):4053-72. PubMed ID: 24825821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
