These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33819327)
1. Accuracy of Implant Placement Guided with Surgical Template: An In Vitro and In Vivo Study. Zhou M; Zhou H; Li SY; Yang XB; Geng YM; Che YJ Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2021; 41(2):e55-e62. PubMed ID: 33819327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study. Cushen SE; Turkyilmaz I J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23566606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of Surgical Template on the Accuracy of Implant Placement. Xu LW; You J; Zhang JX; Liu YF; Peng W J Prosthodont; 2016 Dec; 25(8):641-646. PubMed ID: 26619380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates. Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Boumans T; de Haan AF; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 17(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 23879524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In Vivo Accuracy of Implant Placement Using a Full Digital Planning Modality and Stereolithographic Guides. Skjerven H; Riis UH; Herlofsson BB; Ellingsen JE Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):124-132. PubMed ID: 30695088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Impact of Surgical Guide Fixation and Implant Location on Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery. Pessoa R; Siqueira R; Li J; Saleh I; Meneghetti P; Bezerra F; Wang HL; Mendonça G J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):155-164. PubMed ID: 33904640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of implant surgical guides fabricated using computer numerical control milling for edentulous jaws: a pilot clinical trial. Chai J; Liu X; Schweyen R; Setz J; Pan S; Liu J; Zhou Y BMC Oral Health; 2020 Oct; 20(1):288. PubMed ID: 33087073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement. Behneke A; Burwinkel M; Behneke N Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 22092586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of three different types of stereolithographic surgical guide in implant placement: an in vitro study. Turbush SK; Turkyilmaz I J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Sep; 108(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 22944314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fully guided implant surgery using Magnetic Resonance Imaging - An in vitro study on accuracy in human mandibles. Flügge T; Ludwig U; Winter G; Amrein P; Kernen F; Nelson K Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Aug; 31(8):737-746. PubMed ID: 32459868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of fully guided orthodontic mini-implant placement evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography: a study involving human cadaver heads. Kniha K; Brandt M; Bock A; Modabber A; Prescher A; Hölzle F; Danesh G; Möhlhenrich SC Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Mar; 25(3):1299-1306. PubMed ID: 32613434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy evaluation of computer-guided implant surgery associated with prototyped surgical guides. Cunha RM; Souza FÁ; Hadad H; Poli PP; Maiorana C; Carvalho PSP J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):266-272. PubMed ID: 32111393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the accuracy of implants placed with CAD-CAM surgical templates manufactured with various 3D printers: An in vitro study. Herschdorfer L; Negreiros WM; Gallucci GO; Hamilton A J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jun; 125(6):905-910. PubMed ID: 32499166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Conventional and Computer-Assisted Implant Planning and Placement in Partially Edentulous Patients. Part 4: Accuracy of Implant Placement. Schneider D; Sancho-Puchades M; Mir-Marí J; Mühlemann S; Jung R; Hämmerle C Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2019; 39(4):e111-e122. PubMed ID: 31226190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of a Template-Guided Implant Surgery System with a CAD/CAM-Based Measurement Method: An In Vitro Study. Brandt J; Brenner M; Lauer HC; Brandt S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(2):328-334. PubMed ID: 29534120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of template-based guided dental implant placement-An in vitro comparison of different manufacturing methods. Sium-Abel A; Keilig L; Dörsam I; Bourauel C Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Aug; 35(8):864-875. PubMed ID: 38629760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dental implant location via surface scanner: a pilot study. Zhou M; Zhou H; Li SY; Geng YM BMC Oral Health; 2020 Nov; 20(1):306. PubMed ID: 33148240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An Accuracy Study of Computer-Planned Implant Placement in the Augmented Maxilla Using Mucosa-Supported Surgical Templates. Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Bergé SJ; Soehardi RA; Xi T; de Haan AF; Schutyser F; Maal TJ Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 17(6):1154-63. PubMed ID: 25181255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional accuracy of partially guided implant surgery based on dental magnetic resonance imaging. Schwindling FS; Juerchott A; Boehm S; Rues S; Kronsteiner D; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Rammelsberg P; Hilgenfeld T Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Oct; 32(10):1218-1227. PubMed ID: 34352147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability and accuracy of skin-supported surgical templates for computer-planned craniofacial implant placement, a comparison between surgical templates: With and without bony fixation. Dings JPJ; Verhamme L; Maal TJJ; Merkx MAW; Meijer GJ J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Jun; 47(6):977-983. PubMed ID: 30905534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]