154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33819554)
1. A simplified index to quantify the irritation/corrosion potential of chemicals - Part I: Skin.
Charmeau-Genevois C; Sarang S; Perea M; Eadsforth C; Austin T; Thomas P
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Jul; 123():104922. PubMed ID: 33819554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A simplified index to quantify the irritation/corrosion potential of chemicals - Part II: Eye.
Charmeau-Genevois C; Sarang S; Perea M; Mayer N; Eadsforth C; Austin T; Thomas P
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Jul; 123():104935. PubMed ID: 33901590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sub-categorisation of skin corrosive chemicals by the EpiSkin™ reconstructed human epidermis skin corrosion test method according to UN GHS: revision of OECD Test Guideline 431.
Alépée N; Grandidier MH; Cotovio J;
Toxicol In Vitro; 2014 Mar; 28(2):131-45. PubMed ID: 24211528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An integrated testing strategy for in vitro skin corrosion and irritation assessment using SkinEthic™ Reconstructed Human Epidermis.
Alépée N; Grandidier MH; Tornier C; Cotovio J
Toxicol In Vitro; 2015 Oct; 29(7):1779-92. PubMed ID: 26187475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of fibrin-based dermal-epidermal organotypic cultures for in vitro skin corrosion and irritation testing of chemicals according to OECD TG 431 and 439.
Morales M; Pérez D; Correa L; Restrepo L
Toxicol In Vitro; 2016 Oct; 36():89-96. PubMed ID: 27448499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differences in classification for skin corrosion/irritation in EU and Ukraine: Case study of alternative (in vitro and in silico) methods application for classification of pesticide active ingredient imazamox.
Kolesnyk S; Bubalo N; Prodanchuk M; Zhminko P
Toxicol In Vitro; 2019 Oct; 60():71-75. PubMed ID: 31100379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development of an in vitro corrosion/irritation prediction assay using the EpiDerm skin model.
Kidd DA; Johnson M; Clements J
Toxicol In Vitro; 2007 Oct; 21(7):1292-7. PubMed ID: 17936572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A ready-to-use integrated in vitro skin corrosion and irritation testing strategy using EpiSkin™ model in China.
Liu Y; Li N; Chen L; Alépée N; Cai Z
Toxicol In Vitro; 2020 Jun; 65():104778. PubMed ID: 31962199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The usefulness of the validated SkinEthic™ RHE test method to identify skin corrosive UN GHS subcategories.
Alépée N; Robert C; Tornier C; Cotovio J
Toxicol In Vitro; 2014 Jun; 28(4):616-25. PubMed ID: 24389111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of a tiered in vitro testing strategy for assessing the ocular and dermal irritation/corrosion potential of pharmaceutical compounds for worker safety.
Graham JC; Wilt N; Costin GE; Villano C; Bader J; Krawiec L; Sly E; Gould J
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2018 Dec; 37(4):380-390. PubMed ID: 30035615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The ECVAM international validation study on in vitro tests for acute skin irritation: selection of test chemicals.
Eskes C; Cole T; Hoffmann S; Worth A; Cockshott A; Gerner I; Zuang V
Altern Lab Anim; 2007 Dec; 35(6):603-19. PubMed ID: 18186668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Usefulness of the EpiSkin™ reconstructed human epidermis model within Integrated Approaches on Testing and Assessment (IATA) for skin corrosion and irritation.
Alépée N; Grandidier MH; Cotovio J
Toxicol In Vitro; 2019 Feb; 54():147-167. PubMed ID: 30266437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of SARs for the prediction of skin irritation/corrosion potential: structural inclusion rules in the BfR decision support system.
Saliner AG; Tsakovska I; Pavan M; Patlewicz G; Worth AP
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2007; 18(3-4):331-42. PubMed ID: 17514574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro skin corrosion: Human skin model test - A validation study.
Deshmukh GR; Kumar KH; Reddy PV; Rao BS
Toxicol In Vitro; 2012 Sep; 26(6):1072-4. PubMed ID: 22542585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Immortalized keratinocytes cells generates an effective model of Epidermal Human Equivalent for irritation and corrosion tests.
Mini CA; Dreossi SAC; Abe FR; Maria-Engler SS; Oliveira DP
Toxicol In Vitro; 2021 Mar; 71():105069. PubMed ID: 33309870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Regulatory accepted but out of domain: In vitro skin irritation tests for agrochemical formulations.
Kolle SN; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Oct; 89():125-130. PubMed ID: 28734851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dermo-epidermal organotypic cultures for in vitro evaluation of skin irritation and corrosion.
Gaviria Agudelo C; Becerra NY; Vergara JD; Correa LA; Estrada S; Restrepo LM
Toxicol In Vitro; 2020 Mar; 63():104657. PubMed ID: 31644923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of a read-across workflow for skin irritation and corrosion predictions.
Abe A; Sezaki T; Kinoshita K
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2019 Apr; 30(4):279-298. PubMed ID: 31012352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Regulatory assessment of in vitro skin corrosion and irritation data within the European framework: Workshop recommendations.
Eskes C; Detappe V; Koëter H; Kreysa J; Liebsch M; Zuang V; Amcoff P; Barroso J; Cotovio J; Guest R; Hermann M; Hoffmann S; Masson P; Alépée N; Arce LA; Brüschweiler B; Catone T; Cihak R; Clouzeau J; D'Abrosca F; Delveaux C; Derouette JP; Engelking O; Facchini D; Fröhlicher M; Hofmann M; Hopf N; Molinari J; Oberli A; Ott M; Peter R; Sá-Rocha VM; Schenk D; Tomicic C; Vanparys P; Verdon B; Wallenhorst T; Winkler GC; Depallens O
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Mar; 62(2):393-403. PubMed ID: 22085589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Apparent limitations of OECD TG 431 for classification of acrylic- and methacrylic-based adhesives.
Hoerst A; Hermann M; Mewes KR; Steinmeyer L; Buchholzer M
Toxicol In Vitro; 2024 Feb; 94():105700. PubMed ID: 37751785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
