157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33819780)
1. The association between clinicians' initial judgments of feigning and outcomes on symptom validity measures among pretrial forensic psychiatric inpatients.
Ng W; Mattos LA; Coffey CA; Molina SM; Gottfried ED; Glassmire DM
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2021; 76():101698. PubMed ID: 33819780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Likelihood of obtaining Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) and SIRS-2 elevations among forensic psychiatric inpatients with screening elevations on the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test.
Glassmire DM; Tarescavage AM; Gottfried ED
Psychol Assess; 2016 Dec; 28(12):1586-1596. PubMed ID: 27046275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Relationship Between Psychiatric and Cognitive Symptom Feigning Among Forensic Inpatients Adjudicated Incompetent to Stand Trial.
Gottfried E; Glassmire D
Assessment; 2016 Dec; 23(6):672-682. PubMed ID: 26253572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differences between Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) and SIRS-2 sensitivity estimates among forensic inpatients: A criterion groups comparison.
Tarescavage AM; Glassmire DM
Law Hum Behav; 2016 Oct; 40(5):488-502. PubMed ID: 27077677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of malingering with repeat forensic evaluations: patient variability and possible misclassification on the SIRS and other feigning measures.
Rogers R; Vitacco MJ; Kurus SJ
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2010; 38(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 20305084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of malingering: psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the structured interview of reported symptoms-2.
Liu C; Liu Z; Chiu HF; Carl TW; Zhang H; Wang P; Wu G; Mwansisya TE; Cao L; Hu A; Wang Y; Xue Z
BMC Psychiatry; 2013 Oct; 13():254. PubMed ID: 24106829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing feigning with the Feigning Evaluation INtegrating Sources (FEINS) in a forensic psychiatric sample.
Grossi LM; Green D; Cabeldue M; Pivovarova E
Psychol Serv; 2022 May; 19(2):213-224. PubMed ID: 33119340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening for feigning in a civil forensic setting.
Alwes YR; Clark JA; Berry DT; Granacher RP
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2008 Feb; 30(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 18938665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms-2nd Edition (SIRS-2): Use and Admissibility in Forensic Mental Health Assessment.
Wygant DB; Tylicki JL; Disney LF; Connelly AI
J Pers Assess; 2022; 104(2):265-280. PubMed ID: 34871131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection strategies for malingering with the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test: a confirmatory factor analysis of its underlying dimensions.
Vitacco MJ; Jackson RL; Rogers R; Neumann CS; Miller HA; Gabel J
Assessment; 2008 Mar; 15(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 18258736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validity of the Miller forensic assessment of symptoms test in psychiatric inpatients.
Veazey CH; Wagner AL; Hays JR; Miller HA
Psychol Rep; 2005 Jun; 96(3 Pt 1):771-4. PubMed ID: 16050637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Malingering in a correctional setting: the use of the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms in a jail sample.
McDermott BE; Sokolov G
Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(5):753-65. PubMed ID: 19743514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Self-Report Symptom Inventory (SRSI) is sensitive to instructed feigning, but not to genuine psychopathology in male forensic inpatients: An initial study.
van Helvoort D; Merckelbach H; Merten T
Clin Neuropsychol; 2019 Aug; 33(6):1069-1082. PubMed ID: 30698055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Distinguishing clinical and simulated dissociative identity disorder using the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test.
Barth MR; Brand BL; Nester MS
Psychol Trauma; 2023 Jul; 15(5):846-852. PubMed ID: 36656739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the Response Bias Scale and Improbable Failure Scale in assessing feigned cognitive impairment.
Grossi LM; Green D; Einzig S; Belfi B
Psychol Assess; 2017 May; 29(5):531-541. PubMed ID: 27504905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Screening for feigned psychiatric symptoms in a forensic sample by using the MMPI-2 and the structured inventory of malingered symptomatology.
Lewis JL; Simcox AM; Berry DT
Psychol Assess; 2002 Jun; 14(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 12056079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cross-cultural feigning assessment: A systematic review of feigning instruments used with linguistically, ethnically, and culturally diverse samples.
Nijdam-Jones A; Rosenfeld B
Psychol Assess; 2017 Nov; 29(11):1321-1336. PubMed ID: 28080105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The utility of the structured interview of reported symptoms in a sample of individuals with intellectual disabilities.
Weiss RA; Rosenfeld B; Farkas MR
Assessment; 2011 Sep; 18(3):284-90. PubMed ID: 21561992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of the SIRS in compensation cases: an examination of its validity and generalizability.
Rogers R; Payne JW; Berry DT; Granacher RP
Law Hum Behav; 2009 Jun; 33(3):213-24. PubMed ID: 18679780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Overlooking Feigning Behavior May Result in Potential Harmful Treatment Interventions: Two Case Reports of Undetected Malingering.
van der Heide D; Boskovic I; van Harten P; Merckelbach H
J Forensic Sci; 2020 Jul; 65(4):1371-1375. PubMed ID: 32202670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
