These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33819848)
1. Counterfactual thinking and recency effects in causal judgment. Henne P; Kulesza A; Perez K; Houcek A Cognition; 2021 Jul; 212():104708. PubMed ID: 33819848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Double Prevention, Causal Judgments, and Counterfactuals. Henne P; O'Neill K Cogn Sci; 2022 May; 46(5):e13127. PubMed ID: 35488801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A counterfactual explanation for the action effect in causal judgment. Henne P; Niemi L; Pinillos Á; De Brigard F; Knobe J Cognition; 2019 Sep; 190():157-164. PubMed ID: 31082750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perceived similarity of imagined possible worlds affects judgments of counterfactual plausibility. De Brigard F; Henne P; Stanley ML Cognition; 2021 Apr; 209():104574. PubMed ID: 33444962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A counterfactual simulation model of causation by omission. Gerstenberg T; Stephan S Cognition; 2021 Nov; 216():104842. PubMed ID: 34303272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Précis of The rational imagination: how people create alternatives to reality. Byrne RM Behav Brain Sci; 2007 Dec; 30(5-6):439-53; discussion 453-76. PubMed ID: 18321404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Looking at Mental Images: Eye-Tracking Mental Simulation During Retrospective Causal Judgment. Krasich K; O'Neill K; De Brigard F Cogn Sci; 2024 Mar; 48(3):e13426. PubMed ID: 38528803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Immoral Professors and Malfunctioning Tools: Counterfactual Relevance Accounts Explain the Effect of Norm Violations on Causal Selection. Kominsky JF; Phillips J Cogn Sci; 2019 Nov; 43(11):e12792. PubMed ID: 31742757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A counterfactual simulation model of causal judgments for physical events. Gerstenberg T; Goodman ND; Lagnado DA; Tenenbaum JB Psychol Rev; 2021 Oct; 128(5):936-975. PubMed ID: 34096754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What would have happened? Counterfactuals, hypotheticals and causal judgements. Gerstenberg T Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2022 Dec; 377(1866):20210339. PubMed ID: 36314143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. It Could Have Been True: How Counterfactual Thoughts Reduce Condemnation of Falsehoods and Increase Political Polarization. Effron DA Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2018 May; 44(5):729-745. PubMed ID: 29359629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. When do we think that X caused Y? Quillien T Cognition; 2020 Dec; 205():104410. PubMed ID: 32768136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Causal Judgment in the Wild: Evidence from the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election. Quillien T; Barlev M Cogn Sci; 2022 Feb; 46(2):e13101. PubMed ID: 35122295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. There aren't plenty more fish in the sea: a causal network approach. Nikolic M; Lagnado DA Br J Psychol; 2015 Nov; 106(4):564-82. PubMed ID: 25597224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. What is and what never should have been: Children's causal and counterfactual judgments about the same events. Nyhout A; Ganea PA J Exp Child Psychol; 2020 Apr; 192():104773. PubMed ID: 31952816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]