These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33819943)

  • 1. Vertebral Endplate Cyst Formation in Relation to Properties of Interbody Cages.
    Sasaki M; Umegaki M; Fukunaga T; Hijikata Y; Banba Y; Matsumoto K; Miyao Y
    Neurospine; 2021 Mar; 18(1):170-176. PubMed ID: 33819943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trabecular Bone Remodeling After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison of Three-Dimensional Porous Tantalum and Titanium-Coated Polyetheretherketone Interbody Cages.
    Segi N; Nakashima H; Shinjo R; Kagami Y; Machino M; Ito S; Ouchida J; Morishita K; Oishi R; Yamauchi I; Imagama S
    Global Spine J; 2023 Apr; ():21925682231170613. PubMed ID: 37060284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vertebral Endplate Cyst as a Predictor of Nonunion After Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison of Titanium and Polyetheretherketone Cages.
    Tanida S; Fujibayashi S; Otsuki B; Masamoto K; Takahashi Y; Nakayama T; Matsuda S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Oct; 41(20):E1216-E1222. PubMed ID: 27054449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does the formation of vertebral endplate cysts predict nonunion after lumbar interbody fusion?
    Fujibayashi S; Takemoto M; Izeki M; Takahashi Y; Nakayama T; Neo M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Sep; 37(19):E1197-202. PubMed ID: 22588381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Effectiveness of Tritanium Cages in Preventing Osteolytic Vertebral Endplate Cysts After Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Takeuchi S; Inoue T; Takahashi T; Kanematsu R; Minami M; Hanakita J
    World Neurosurg; 2024 Apr; 184():e803-e808. PubMed ID: 38369108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Polyetheretherketone Versus Titanium Cages for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature.
    Massaad E; Fatima N; Kiapour A; Hadzipasic M; Shankar GM; Shin JH
    Neurospine; 2020 Mar; 17(1):125-135. PubMed ID: 32252163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison in the same intervertebral space between titanium-coated and uncoated PEEK cages in lumbar interbody fusion surgery.
    Kashii M; Kitaguchi K; Makino T; Kaito T
    J Orthop Sci; 2020 Jul; 25(4):565-570. PubMed ID: 31375363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Early Fusion Status after Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Fixation: A Comparison of Titanium-Coated Polyetheretherketone Cages and Carbon Polyetheretherketone Cages.
    Sakaura H; Ohnishi A; Yamagishi A; Ohwada T
    Asian Spine J; 2019 Apr; 13(2):248-253. PubMed ID: 30481976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Mid-term results of 360-degree lumbar spondylodesis with the use of a tantalum implant for disc replacement].
    Matejka J; Zeman J; Belatka J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Oct; 76(5):388-93. PubMed ID: 19912702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Short-Term Radiographical and Clinical Outcomes After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With a 3D Porous Titanium Alloy Cage and a Titanium-Coated PEEK Cage.
    Makino T; Takenaka S; Sakai Y; Yoshikawa H; Kaito T
    Global Spine J; 2022 Jun; 12(5):931-939. PubMed ID: 33203254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Finite element model predicts the biomechanical performance of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with various porous additive manufactured cages.
    Zhang Z; Li H; Fogel GR; Xiang D; Liao Z; Liu W
    Comput Biol Med; 2018 Apr; 95():167-174. PubMed ID: 29501735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In Vitro and In Vivo Comparison of Bone Growth Characteristics in Additive-Manufactured Porous Titanium, Nonporous Titanium, and Porous Tantalum Interbody Cages.
    Wu MH; Lee MH; Wu C; Tsai PI; Hsu WB; Huang SI; Lin TH; Yang KY; Chen CY; Chen SH; Lee CY; Huang TJ; Tsau FH; Li YY
    Materials (Basel); 2022 May; 15(10):. PubMed ID: 35629694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interbody device endplate engagement effects on motion segment biomechanics.
    Buttermann GR; Beaubien BP; Freeman AL; Stoll JE; Chappuis JL
    Spine J; 2009 Jul; 9(7):564-73. PubMed ID: 19457722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiological Outcomes of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using a Titanium-coated PEEK Cage.
    Manabe H; Sakai T; Morimoto M; Tezuka F; Yamashita K; Takata Y; Sairyo K
    J Med Invest; 2019; 66(1.2):119-122. PubMed ID: 31064922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trabecular Bone Remodeling after Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison of the Osseointegration in Three-Dimensional Porous Titanium Cages and Polyether-Ether-Ketone Cages.
    Segi N; Nakashima H; Ito S; Ouchida J; Oishi R; Yamauchi I; Miyairi Y; Morita Y; Matsumoto T; Kanbara S; Ito K; Imagama S
    Global Spine J; 2024 May; ():21925682241255686. PubMed ID: 38752287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Instability of lower lumbar treated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion with autologous iliac crest or interbody fusion cage: a comparative study].
    Wang R; Lin X; Shi S; Xiu Z; Guo Y
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 22(8):928-32. PubMed ID: 18773807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A longitudinal investigation of the endplate cystic lesion effect on oblique lumbar interbody fusion.
    Lin GX; Kotheeranurak V; Zeng TH; Mahatthanatrakul A; Kim JS
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2019 Sep; 184():105407. PubMed ID: 31398631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Titanium-coated PEEK Cage Maintains Better Bone Fusion With the Endplate Than the PEEK Cage 6 Months After PLIF Surgery: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Study.
    Hasegawa T; Ushirozako H; Shigeto E; Ohba T; Oba H; Mukaiyama K; Shimizu S; Yamato Y; Ide K; Shibata Y; Ojima T; Takahashi J; Haro H; Matsuyama Y
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Aug; 45(15):E892-E902. PubMed ID: 32675599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computational comparison of three posterior lumbar interbody fusion techniques by using porous titanium interbody cages with 50% porosity.
    Lee YH; Chung CJ; Wang CW; Peng YT; Chang CH; Chen CH; Chen YN; Li CT
    Comput Biol Med; 2016 Apr; 71():35-45. PubMed ID: 26874064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bony ingrowth potential of 3D-printed porous titanium alloy: a direct comparison of interbody cage materials in an in vivo ovine lumbar fusion model.
    McGilvray KC; Easley J; Seim HB; Regan D; Berven SH; Hsu WK; Mroz TE; Puttlitz CM
    Spine J; 2018 Jul; 18(7):1250-1260. PubMed ID: 29496624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.