These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33820526)
1. To denoise or to cluster, that is not the question: optimizing pipelines for COI metabarcoding and metaphylogeography. Antich A; Palacin C; Wangensteen OS; Turon X BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Apr; 22(1):177. PubMed ID: 33820526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. DnoisE: distance denoising by entropy. An open-source parallelizable alternative for denoising sequence datasets. Antich A; Palacín C; Turon X; Wangensteen OS PeerJ; 2022; 10():e12758. PubMed ID: 35111399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. From metabarcoding to metaphylogeography: separating the wheat from the chaff. Turon X; Antich A; Palacín C; Praebel K; Wangensteen OS Ecol Appl; 2020 Mar; 30(2):e02036. PubMed ID: 31709684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bioinformatic pipelines combining denoising and clustering tools allow for more comprehensive prokaryotic and eukaryotic metabarcoding. Brandt MI; Trouche B; Quintric L; Günther B; Wincker P; Poulain J; Arnaud-Haond S Mol Ecol Resour; 2021 Aug; 21(6):1904-1921. PubMed ID: 33835712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. DNA metabarcoding of littoral hard-bottom communities: high diversity and database gaps revealed by two molecular markers. Wangensteen OS; Palacín C; Guardiola M; Turon X PeerJ; 2018; 6():e4705. PubMed ID: 29740514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing diversity levels in environmental samples: DNA sequence capture and metabarcoding approaches using 18S and COI genes. Giebner H; Langen K; Bourlat SJ; Kukowka S; Mayer C; Astrin JJ; Misof B; Fonseca VG Mol Ecol Resour; 2020 Sep; 20(5):1333-1345. PubMed ID: 32462738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas. Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Why the COI barcode should be the community DNA metabarcode for the metazoa. Andújar C; Arribas P; Yu DW; Vogler AP; Emerson BC Mol Ecol; 2018 Oct; 27(20):3968-3975. PubMed ID: 30129071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimal sequence similarity thresholds for clustering of molecular operational taxonomic units in DNA metabarcoding studies. Bonin A; Guerrieri A; Ficetola GF Mol Ecol Resour; 2023 Feb; 23(2):368-381. PubMed ID: 36052659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. PEMA: a flexible Pipeline for Environmental DNA Metabarcoding Analysis of the 16S/18S ribosomal RNA, ITS, and COI marker genes. Zafeiropoulos H; Viet HQ; Vasileiadou K; Potirakis A; Arvanitidis C; Topalis P; Pavloudi C; Pafilis E Gigascience; 2020 Mar; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 32161947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) metabarcoding of Foraminifera communities using taxon-specific primers. Macher JN; Bloska DM; Holzmann M; Girard EB; Pawlowski J; Renema W PeerJ; 2022; 10():e13952. PubMed ID: 36093332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Denoising the Denoisers: an independent evaluation of microbiome sequence error-correction approaches. Nearing JT; Douglas GM; Comeau AM; Langille MGI PeerJ; 2018; 6():e5364. PubMed ID: 30123705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of marker choice and thermal cycling protocol on zooplankton DNA metabarcoding studies. Clarke LJ; Beard JM; Swadling KM; Deagle BE Ecol Evol; 2017 Feb; 7(3):873-883. PubMed ID: 28168024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimating intraspecific genetic diversity from community DNA metabarcoding data. Elbrecht V; Vamos EE; Steinke D; Leese F PeerJ; 2018; 6():e4644. PubMed ID: 29666773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of markers for the monitoring of freshwater benthic biodiversity through DNA metabarcoding. Ficetola GF; Boyer F; Valentini A; Bonin A; Meyer A; Dejean T; Gaboriaud C; Usseglio-Polatera P; Taberlet P Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3189-3202. PubMed ID: 32920861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can DNA-Based Ecosystem Assessments Quantify Species Abundance? Testing Primer Bias and Biomass--Sequence Relationships with an Innovative Metabarcoding Protocol. Elbrecht V; Leese F PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0130324. PubMed ID: 26154168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effects of parameter choice on defining molecular operational taxonomic units and resulting ecological analyses of metabarcoding data. Clare EL; Chain FJ; Littlefair JE; Cristescu ME Genome; 2016 Nov; 59(11):981-990. PubMed ID: 27336462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Coming of age for COI metabarcoding of whole organism community DNA: Towards bioinformatic harmonisation. Creedy TJ; Andújar C; Meramveliotakis E; Noguerales V; Overcast I; Papadopoulou A; Morlon H; Vogler AP; Emerson BC; Arribas P Mol Ecol Resour; 2022 Apr; 22(3):847-861. PubMed ID: 34496132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. DNA metabarcoding and the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I marker: not a perfect match. Deagle BE; Jarman SN; Coissac E; Pompanon F; Taberlet P Biol Lett; 2014 Sep; 10(9):. PubMed ID: 25209199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]