164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33820744)
1. Rapid Assessment of Resection Margins During Breast Conserving Surgery Using Intraoperative Flow Cytometry.
Vartholomatos G; Harissis H; Andreou M; Tatsi V; Pappa L; Kamina S; Batistatou A; Markopoulos GS; Alexiou GA
Clin Breast Cancer; 2021 Oct; 21(5):e602-e610. PubMed ID: 33820744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Resection margins in ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery.
Olsha O; Shemesh D; Carmon M; Sibirsky O; Abu Dalo R; Rivkin L; Ashkenazi I
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Feb; 18(2):447-52. PubMed ID: 20734147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does intra-operative margin assessment improve margin status and re-excision rates? A population-based analysis of outcomes in breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ.
Laws A; Brar MS; Bouchard-Fortier A; Leong B; Quan ML
J Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 118(7):1205-1211. PubMed ID: 30293241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?
Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intraoperative margin assessment and re-excision rate in breast conserving surgery.
Fleming FJ; Hill AD; Mc Dermott EW; O'Doherty A; O'Higgins NJ; Quinn CM
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2004 Apr; 30(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 15028301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MRI predictors of tumor-positive margins after breast-conserving surgery.
Bahl M; Baker JA; Kinsey EN; Ghate SV
Clin Imaging; 2019; 57():45-49. PubMed ID: 31128385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Low re-excision rate for positive margins in patients treated with ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery.
Yu CC; Chiang KC; Kuo WL; Shen SC; Lo YF; Chen SC
Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):698-702. PubMed ID: 23333255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery.
Cabioglu N; Hunt KK; Sahin AA; Kuerer HM; Babiera GV; Singletary SE; Whitman GJ; Ross MI; Ames FC; Feig BW; Buchholz TA; Meric-Bernstam F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1458-71. PubMed ID: 17260108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Frozen section analysis for intraoperative margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery results in low rates of re-excision and local recurrence.
Olson TP; Harter J; Muñoz A; Mahvi DM; Breslin T
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2953-60. PubMed ID: 17674109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic Accuracy of Quantitative Micro-Elastography for Margin Assessment in Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Kennedy KM; Zilkens R; Allen WM; Foo KY; Fang Q; Chin L; Sanderson RW; Anstie J; Wijesinghe P; Curatolo A; Tan HEI; Morin N; Kunjuraman B; Yeomans C; Chin SL; DeJong H; Giles K; Dessauvagie BF; Latham B; Saunders CM; Kennedy BF
Cancer Res; 2020 Apr; 80(8):1773-1783. PubMed ID: 32295783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Preoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI can reduce the rate of tumor-positive resection margins after breast conserving surgery in patients with early non-mass breast carcinoma].
Li XS; Song YL; Li DC; Zhu HX; Meng LM; Huang RR; Wang SL; Wang D; Fang H; Fan HX
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2017 Oct; 39(10):768-774. PubMed ID: 29061022
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Intraoperative Margin Assessment during Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Park KU; Kuerer HM; Rauch GM; Leung JWT; Sahin AA; Wei W; Li Y; Black DM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Jun; 26(6):1720-1728. PubMed ID: 30877499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intraoperative touch preparation cytology for margin assessment in breast-conservation surgery: does it work for lobular carcinoma?
Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Ali I; Feldman SM; Cohen JM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2940-5. PubMed ID: 17632761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preoperative and intraoperative predictors of positive margins after breast-conserving surgery: a retrospective review.
Saadai P; Moezzi M; Menes T
Breast Cancer; 2011 Jul; 18(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 21465227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Imaging of lumpectomy surface with large field-of-view confocal laser scanning microscopy 'Histolog® scanner' for breast margin assessment in comparison with conventional specimen radiography.
Togawa R; Hederer J; Ragazzi M; Bruckner T; Fastner S; Gomez C; Hennigs A; Nees J; Pfob A; Riedel F; Schäfgen B; Stieber A; Lux MP; Heil J; Golatta M
Breast; 2023 Apr; 68():194-200. PubMed ID: 36842192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Short term safety of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery for larger tumors.
Wijgman DJ; Ten Wolde B; van Groesen NR; Keemers-Gels ME; van den Wildenberg FJ; Strobbe LJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):665-671. PubMed ID: 28041648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Role of re-excision for positive and close resection margins in patients treated with breast-conserving surgery.
Biglia N; Ponzone R; Bounous VE; Mariani LL; Maggiorotto F; Benevelli C; Liberale V; Ottino MC; Sismondi P
Breast; 2014 Dec; 23(6):870-5. PubMed ID: 25305040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implications of New Lumpectomy Margin Guidelines for Breast-Conserving Surgery: Changes in Reexcision Rates and Predicted Rates of Residual Tumor.
Merrill AL; Coopey SB; Tang R; McEvoy MP; Specht MC; Hughes KS; Gadd MA; Smith BL
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):729-34. PubMed ID: 26467458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictors of Surgical Margin Following Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Large Population-Based Cohort Study.
van Deurzen CH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(Suppl 5):627-633. PubMed ID: 27590331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The efficiency of MarginProbe in detecting positive resection margins in epithelial breast cancer following breast conserving surgery.
Hoffman A; Ashkenazi I
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Jul; 48(7):1498-1502. PubMed ID: 35219544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
