These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33821322)

  • 1. Thirty-six-month clinical evaluation of posterior high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composite restorations in a high caries incidence population: interim results of a randomized clinical trial.
    Durão MA; de Andrade AKM; do Prado AM; Veloso SRM; Maciel LMT; Montes MAJR; Monteiro GQM
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Nov; 25(11):6219-6237. PubMed ID: 33821322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of different placement techniques on the clinical success of bulk-fill resin composites placed in Class II cavities: a 4-year randomized controlled clinical study.
    Çakır Kılınç NN; Demirbuğa S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Feb; 27(2):541-557. PubMed ID: 36222961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Randomized 36-month follow-up of posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations.
    Loguercio AD; Rezende M; Gutierrez MF; Costa TF; Armas-Vega A; Reis A
    J Dent; 2019 Jun; 85():93-102. PubMed ID: 31100332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical Performance of Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Restorations Using the United States Public Health Service and Federation Dentaire Internationale Criteria: A 12-Month Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Durão MA; Andrade AKM; Santos MDCMDS; Montes MAJR; Monteiro GQM
    Eur J Dent; 2021 May; 15(2):179-192. PubMed ID: 33242913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 5-year clinical performance of posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations: A double-blind randomized controlled trial.
    Loguercio AD; Ñaupari-Villasante R; Gutierrez MF; Gonzalez MI; Reis A; Heintze SD
    Dent Mater; 2023 Dec; 39(12):1159-1168. PubMed ID: 37839995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Six-year clinical evaluation of bulk-fill and nanofill resin composite restorations.
    Yazici AR; Kutuk ZB; Ergin E; Karahan S; Antonson SA
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jan; 26(1):417-426. PubMed ID: 34110494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-year clinical evaluation of a silorane composite resin.
    Walter R; Boushell LW; Heymann HO; Ritter AV; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD; Chung Y; Swift EJ
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2014; 26(3):179-90. PubMed ID: 24344912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microtensile Bond Strength of Bulk-fill Resin Composite Restorations in High C-factor Cavities.
    de Oliveira ILM; de Brito OFF; de Melo Monteiro LMCGQ; Resende Montes MAJ
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Jun; 21(6):626-631. PubMed ID: 33025930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A randomized, prospective clinical study evaluating effectiveness of a bulk-fill composite resin, a conventional composite resin and a reinforced glass ionomer in Class II cavities: one-year results.
    Balkaya H; Arslan S; Pala K
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2019; 27():e20180678. PubMed ID: 31596369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance of bulk-fill versus conventional nanocomposite resin restorations supporting the occlusal rests of removable partial dentures: An in vitro investigation.
    Mesallum EE; Abd El Aziz PM; Swelem AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jun; 129(6):907.e1-907.e7. PubMed ID: 37100650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative evaluation of different adhesive strategies of a universal adhesive in class II bulk-fill restorations: A 48-month randomized controlled trial.
    Yazici AR; Uslu Tekce A; Kutuk ZB
    J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103921. PubMed ID: 34896442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of a resin-based sealant with a nano-filled flowable resin composite on sealing performance of marginal defects in resin composites restorations: a 36-months clinical evaluation.
    Estay J; Pardo-Díaz C; Reinoso E; Perez-Iñigo J; Martín J; Jorquera G; Kuga M; Fernández E
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Oct; 26(10):6087-6095. PubMed ID: 35608683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial of one nano-hybrid and one high-viscosity bulk-fill composite restorative systems in class II cavities: 12 months results.
    Colak H; Tokay U; Uzgur R; Hamidi MM; Ercan E
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2017 Jul; 20(7):822-831. PubMed ID: 28791976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Two-year Clinical Comparison of Three Different Restorative Materials in Class II Cavities.
    Balkaya H; Arslan S
    Oper Dent; 2020; 45(1):E32-E42. PubMed ID: 31738696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Low- and high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites: a comparison of microhardness, microtensile bond strength, and fracture strength in restored molars.
    França FM; Tenuti JG; Broglio IP; Paiva LE; Basting RT; Turssi CP; do Amaral FL; Reis AF; Vieira-Junior WF
    Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2021 Aug; 34(2):173-182. PubMed ID: 34570866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of Resin Composite Viscosity and Fill-technique on Internal Gap in Class I Restorations: An OCT Evaluation.
    Kantovitz KR; Cabral LL; Carlos NR; de Freitas AZ; Peruzzo DC; Franca F; do Amaral F; Basting RT; Puppin-Rontani RM
    Oper Dent; 2021 Sep; 46(5):537-546. PubMed ID: 34929042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marginal Gap Formation in Approximal "Bulk Fill" Resin Composite Restorations After Artificial Ageing.
    Peutzfeldt A; Mühlebach S; Lussi A; Flury S
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(2):180-189. PubMed ID: 29148914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preliminary data on clinical performance of bulk-fill restorations in primary molars.
    Oter B; Deniz K; Cehreli SB
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 Nov; 21(11):1484-1491. PubMed ID: 30417848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microleakage in class II restorations of two bulk fill resin composites and a conventional nanohybrid resin composite: an in vitro study at 10,000 thermocycles.
    Cayo-Rojas CF; Hernández-Caba KK; Aliaga-Mariñas AS; Ladera-Castañeda MI; Cervantes-Ganoza LA
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Dec; 21(1):619. PubMed ID: 34861859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Randomized prospective clinical trial of class II restorations using flowable bulk-fill resin composites: 4-year follow-up.
    Endo Hoshino IA; Fraga Briso AL; Bueno Esteves LM; Dos Santos PH; Meira Borghi Frascino S; Fagundes TC
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Sep; 26(9):5697-5710. PubMed ID: 35556174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.