These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33821350)
1. Pelvimetric and Nutritional Factors Predicting Surgical Difficulty in Laparoscopic Resection for Rectal Cancer Following Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy. Sun Y; Chen J; Ye C; Lin H; Lu X; Huang Y; Chi P World J Surg; 2021 Jul; 45(7):2261-2269. PubMed ID: 33821350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MRI pelvimetry-based evaluation of surgical difficulty in laparoscopic total mesorectal excision after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for male rectal cancer. Chen J; Sun Y; Chi P; Sun B Surg Today; 2021 Jul; 51(7):1144-1151. PubMed ID: 33420827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing surgical difficulty in locally advanced mid-low rectal cancer: the accuracy of two MRI-based predictive scores. de'Angelis N; Pigneur F; Martínez-Pérez A; Vitali GC; Landi F; Gómez-Abril SA; Assalino M; Espin E; Ris F; Luciani A; Brunetti F; Colorectal Dis; 2019 Mar; 21(3):277-286. PubMed ID: 30428156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes with laparoscopic and open surgeries. Perdawood SK; Thinggaard BS; Bjoern MX Surg Endosc; 2018 May; 32(5):2312-2321. PubMed ID: 29098433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Predictive value of MRI pelvic measurements for "difficult pelvis" during total mesorectal excision]. Sun Z; Hou WY; Liu JJ; Xue HD; Xu PR; Wu B; Lin GL; Xu L; Lu JY; Xiao Y Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Dec; 25(12):1089-1097. PubMed ID: 36562232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Development and validation of machine learning models and nomograms for predicting the surgical difficulty of laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer. Li X; Zhou Z; Zhu B; Wu Y; Xing C World J Surg Oncol; 2024 Apr; 22(1):111. PubMed ID: 38664824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interpretable machine learning model to predict surgical difficulty in laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer. Yu M; Yuan Z; Li R; Shi B; Wan D; Dong X Front Oncol; 2024; 14():1337219. PubMed ID: 38380369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Magnetic resonance imaging pelvimetry predicts the technical difficulty of rectal surgery. Ma Q; Cheng J; Bao Y; Gao Z; Jiang K; Wang S; Ye Y; Wang Y; Shen Z Asian J Surg; 2022 Dec; 45(12):2626-2632. PubMed ID: 34961711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Risk factor analysis on anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer patient with neoadjuvant therapy and establishment of a nomogram prediction model]. Jiang W; Feng MY; Dong XY; Dong SM; Zheng JX; Liu XM; Liu WJ; Yan J Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Aug; 22(8):748-754. PubMed ID: 31422613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Establishment of a nomogram predicting risk factors of postoperative perineal wound complications after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer]. Lu SQ; Chang XF; Yang XD; Yu DC; Huang QG; Wang F Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Apr; 22(4):357-363. PubMed ID: 31054550 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Construction of a nomogram model to predict technical difficulty in performing laparoscopic sphincter-preserving radical resection for rectal cancer. Zhou XC; Guan SW; Ke FY; Dhamija G; Wang Q; Chen BF World J Gastroenterol; 2024 May; 30(18):2418-2439. PubMed ID: 38764764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can MRI pelvimetry predict the technical difficulty of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery? Hong JSY; De Robles MS; Brown C; Brown KGM; Young CJ; Solomon MJ Int J Colorectal Dis; 2021 Dec; 36(12):2613-2620. PubMed ID: 34338870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of MRI pelvimetry in predicting technical difficulty and outcomes of open and minimally invasive total mesorectal excision: a systematic review. Hong JS; Brown KGM; Waller J; Young CJ; Solomon MJ Tech Coloproctol; 2020 Oct; 24(10):991-1000. PubMed ID: 32623536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transanal vs laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: initial experience from Denmark. Perdawood SK; Al Khefagie GA Colorectal Dis; 2016 Jan; 18(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 26603786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction of surgical difficulty in minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer by use of MRI pelvimetry. Yamamoto T; Kawada K; Kiyasu Y; Itatani Y; Mizuno R; Hida K; Sakai Y BJS Open; 2020 Aug; 4(4):666-677. PubMed ID: 32342670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopy-assisted triple-port anterior resection]. Wu H; Zhang T; Chen X; Jing X; Cheng X; Song Z; Zhu L; He Y; Ji X; Zhang H; Zhao R Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Jul; 21(7):779-785. PubMed ID: 30051446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of pathological outcomes after transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a prospective study using data from randomized control trial. Zeng Z; Luo S; Chen J; Cai Y; Zhang X; Kang L Surg Endosc; 2020 Sep; 34(9):3956-3962. PubMed ID: 31586244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors Predicting Difficulty of Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer with Total Mesorectal Excision and Double Stapling Technique. Chen W; Li Q; Fan Y; Li D; Jiang L; Qiu P; Tang L PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0151773. PubMed ID: 26992004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Total mesorectal excision for low and middle rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus transanal approach-a meta-analysis. Aubert M; Mege D; Panis Y Surg Endosc; 2020 Sep; 34(9):3908-3919. PubMed ID: 31617090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Conversion is a risk factor for postoperative anastomotic leak in rectal cancer patients - A retrospective cohort study. Liu XH; Wu XR; Zhou C; Zheng XB; Ke J; Liu HS; Hu T; Chen YF; He XW; He XS; Chen YL; Zou YF; Wang JP; Wu XJ; Lan P Int J Surg; 2018 May; 53():298-303. PubMed ID: 29367043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]