BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33821720)

  • 1. The highly complex issue of conscientious objection to abortion: can the recent European Court of Human Rights ruling Grimmark v. Sweden redefine the notions of care before freedom of conscience?
    Zaami S; Rinaldi R; Montanari Vergallo G
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2021 Aug; 26(4):349-355. PubMed ID: 33821720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Abortion law around the world: progress and pushback.
    Finer L; Fine JB
    Am J Public Health; 2013 Apr; 103(4):585-9. PubMed ID: 23409915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accommodating conscientious objection in the midwifery workforce: a ratio-data analysis of midwives, birth and late abortions in 18 European countries in 2016.
    Fleming V; Maxwell C; Ramsayer B
    Hum Resour Health; 2020 Jun; 18(1):42. PubMed ID: 32513175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Abortion and conscientious objection: rethinking conflicting rights in the Mexican context.
    Ortiz-Millán G
    Glob Bioeth; 2018; 29(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 29249919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Conscientious objection in the matter of abortion].
    Serrano Gil A; García Casado ML
    Rev Enferm; 1992 Mar; 15(163):45-6. PubMed ID: 1565971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three Arguments Against Institutional Conscientious Objection, and Why They Are (Metaphysically) Unconvincing.
    Symons X; Chua RM
    J Med Philos; 2024 Apr; 49(3):298-312. PubMed ID: 38557784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of a Conceptual Model and Survey Instrument to Measure Conscientious Objection to Abortion Provision.
    Harris LF; Awoonor-Williams JK; Gerdts C; Gil Urbano L; González Vélez AC; Halpern J; Prata N; Baffoe P
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164368. PubMed ID: 27736992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The missing voices in the conscientious objection debate: British service users' experiences of conscientious objection to abortion.
    Self B; Maxwell C; Fleming V
    BMC Med Ethics; 2023 Aug; 24(1):65. PubMed ID: 37605173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conscientious objection to abortion in the developing world: The correspondence argument.
    Bhakuni H; Miotto L
    Dev World Bioeth; 2021 Jun; 21(2):90-95. PubMed ID: 33615667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Medical and midwifery students' views on the use of conscientious objection in abortion care, following legal reform in Chile: a cross-sectional study.
    Biggs MA; Casas L; Ramm A; Baba CF; Correa SP
    BMC Med Ethics; 2020 May; 21(1):42. PubMed ID: 32448300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Ninth Amendment: An Underutilized Protection for Reproductive Choice.
    Huff L
    J Law Health; 2024; 37(2):105-126. PubMed ID: 38833598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reframing Conscientious Care: Providing Abortion Care When Law and Conscience Collide.
    Buchbinder M; Lassiter D; Mercier R; Bryant A; Lyerly AD
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2016; 46(2):22-30. PubMed ID: 27120281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Health providers' reasons for participating in abortion care: A scoping review.
    Merner B; Haining CM; Willmott L; Savulescu J; Keogh LA
    Womens Health (Lond); 2024; 20():17455057241233124. PubMed ID: 38426387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. To participate or not to participate: The troublesome question of nurses' conscientious objection to abortion: A qualitative study.
    Fleming V; Maxwell C; Hanlon C; Robb Y; Vermeulen J; Dobrowolska B
    J Adv Nurs; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38864279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Doctors Have no Right to Refuse Medical Assistance in Dying, Abortion or Contraception.
    Savulescu J; Schuklenk U
    Bioethics; 2017 Mar; 31(3):162-170. PubMed ID: 27716989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Without Due Process of Law: The Dobbs Decision and Its Cataclysmic Impact on the Substantive Due Process and Privacy Rights of Ohio Women.
    Wenner J
    J Law Health; 2024; 37(2):187-213. PubMed ID: 38833601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Otolaryngologists and Reproductive Rights.
    Yalamanchi P; Faucett EA; Shuman AG
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2023 Nov; 169(5):1393-1396. PubMed ID: 37210612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Abortion as empowerment: reproductive rights activism in a legally restricted context.
    McReynolds-Pérez J
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Nov; 17(Suppl 2):350. PubMed ID: 29143680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the importance of consistency: a response to Giubilini
    Symons X
    J Med Ethics; 2024 May; 50(5):347-348. PubMed ID: 37280053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Compatibility of Mandatory Vaccination with the European Convention on Human Rights: Implications for a National Vaccination Policy.
    Simons RC; Ploem MC; Legemaate J
    Eur J Health Law; 2024 Apr; 31(3):285-311. PubMed ID: 38704150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.