205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33823593)
41. Single Cell Proteomics Using Multiplexed Isobaric Labeling for Mass Spectrometric Analysis.
Végvári Á; Rodriguez JE; Zubarev RA
Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2386():113-127. PubMed ID: 34766268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. New Set of Isobaric Labeling Reagents for Quantitative 16Plex Proteomics.
Ning X; Li Q; Zi J; Mei Z; Liu J; Zhang Y; Bi M; Ren Y; Liu X; Lv C; Yao H; Sun J; Rao F; Li S; Liu S
Anal Chem; 2023 Apr; 95(13):5788-5795. PubMed ID: 36958307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. HyperSCP: Combining Isotopic and Isobaric Labeling for Higher Throughput Single-Cell Proteomics.
Liang Y; Truong T; Saxton AJ; Boekweg H; Payne SH; Van Ry PM; Kelly RT
Anal Chem; 2023 May; 95(20):8020-8027. PubMed ID: 37167627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. AutoProteome Chip System for Fully Automated and Integrated Proteomics Sample Preparation and Peptide Fractionation.
Lu X; Wang Z; Gao Y; Chen W; Wang L; Huang P; Gao W; Ke M; He A; Tian R
Anal Chem; 2020 Jul; 92(13):8893-8900. PubMed ID: 32490667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Overcoming the detrimental O-acylation in TMTpro labeling improves the proteome depth and quantification precision.
Cai Y; Chang C; Liao R
Anal Chim Acta; 2024 May; 1304():342538. PubMed ID: 38637049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. TMT Labeling for the Masses: A Robust and Cost-efficient, In-solution Labeling Approach.
Zecha J; Satpathy S; Kanashova T; Avanessian SC; Kane MH; Clauser KR; Mertins P; Carr SA; Kuster B
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2019 Jul; 18(7):1468-1478. PubMed ID: 30967486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. A Collision-Induced Dissociation Cleavable Isobaric Tag for Peptide Fragment Ion-Based Quantification in Proteomics.
Tian X; de Vries MP; Permentier HP; Bischoff R
J Proteome Res; 2020 Sep; 19(9):3817-3824. PubMed ID: 32786690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Optimization of mass spectrometry-compatible surfactants for shotgun proteomics.
Chen EI; Cociorva D; Norris JL; Yates JR
J Proteome Res; 2007 Jul; 6(7):2529-38. PubMed ID: 17530876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Systematic comparison of label-free, metabolic labeling, and isobaric chemical labeling for quantitative proteomics on LTQ Orbitrap Velos.
Li Z; Adams RM; Chourey K; Hurst GB; Hettich RL; Pan C
J Proteome Res; 2012 Mar; 11(3):1582-90. PubMed ID: 22188275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Detergent-Assisted Protein Digestion-On the Way to Avoid the Key Bottleneck of Shotgun Bottom-Up Proteomics.
Danko K; Lukasheva E; Zhukov VA; Zgoda V; Frolov A
Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Nov; 23(22):. PubMed ID: 36430380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Automated Coupling of Nanodroplet Sample Preparation with Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry for High-Throughput Single-Cell Proteomics.
Williams SM; Liyu AV; Tsai CF; Moore RJ; Orton DJ; Chrisler WB; Gaffrey MJ; Liu T; Smith RD; Kelly RT; Pasa-Tolic L; Zhu Y
Anal Chem; 2020 Aug; 92(15):10588-10596. PubMed ID: 32639140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Deuterium-Free, Three-Plexed Peptide Diethylation for Highly Accurate Quantitative Proteomics.
Jung J; Jeong K; Choi Y; Kim SA; Kim H; Lee JW; Kim VN; Kim KP; Kim JS
J Proteome Res; 2019 Mar; 18(3):1078-1087. PubMed ID: 30638020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Isobaric Stable Isotope N-Phosphorylation Labeling (iSIPL) for Ultrasensitive Proteome Quantification.
Wang XY; Chen CJ; He YH; Ding LS; Wu YF; Huang CT; Wu J; Ding R; Xue YH; Lin ZW; Xu PX; Wu YL; Liu W; Li JJ; Chen SM; Zhao YF; Dong JY; Zhou Q; Gao X
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl; 2023 May; 62(22):e202303656. PubMed ID: 37016511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Achieving efficient digestion faster with Flash Digest: potential alternative to multi-step detergent assisted in-solution digestion in quantitative proteomics experiments.
Shah V; Lassman ME; Chen Y; Zhou H; Laterza OF
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2017 Jan; 31(2):193-199. PubMed ID: 27794205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. A Review on Quantitative Multiplexed Proteomics.
Pappireddi N; Martin L; Wühr M
Chembiochem; 2019 May; 20(10):1210-1224. PubMed ID: 30609196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Proteomics technologies for the global identification and quantification of proteins.
Brewis IA; Brennan P
Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol; 2010; 80():1-44. PubMed ID: 21109216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Resin-Assisted Capture Coupled with Isobaric Tandem Mass Tag Labeling for Multiplexed Quantification of Protein Thiol Oxidation.
Gaffrey MJ; Day NJ; Li X; Qian WJ
J Vis Exp; 2021 Jun; (172):. PubMed ID: 34223836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Quantitative Comparisons of Large Numbers of Human Plasma Samples Using TMT10plex Labeling.
Liu P; Beer LA; Ky B; Barnhart KT; Speicher DW
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1619():319-337. PubMed ID: 28674894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Comparison of label-free and label-based strategies for proteome analysis of hepatoma cell lines.
Megger DA; Pott LL; Ahrens M; Padden J; Bracht T; Kuhlmann K; Eisenacher M; Meyer HE; Sitek B
Biochim Biophys Acta; 2014 May; 1844(5):967-76. PubMed ID: 23954498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Enhanced characterization of complex proteomic samples using LC-MALDI MS/MS: exclusion of redundant peptides from MS/MS analysis in replicate runs.
Chen HS; Rejtar T; Andreev V; Moskovets E; Karger BL
Anal Chem; 2005 Dec; 77(23):7816-25. PubMed ID: 16316193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
