These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33824159)

  • 1. The readability of general practice websites: a cross-sectional analysis of all general practice websites in Scotland.
    Rughani G; Hanlon P; Corcoran N; Mair FS
    Br J Gen Pract; 2021 May; 71(706):e391-e398. PubMed ID: 33824159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Readability assessment of online ophthalmic patient information.
    Edmunds MR; Barry RJ; Denniston AK
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 131(12):1610-6. PubMed ID: 24178035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.
    Huang G; Fang CH; Agarwal N; Bhagat N; Eloy JA; Langer PD
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 133(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 25654639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An evaluation of the readability and visual appearance of online patient resources for fibroadenoma.
    Hutchings HA; Remesh A
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(11):e0277823. PubMed ID: 36399450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clearly written, easily comprehended? The readability of websites providing information on epilepsy.
    Brigo F; Otte WM; Igwe SC; Tezzon F; Nardone R
    Epilepsy Behav; 2015 Mar; 44():35-9. PubMed ID: 25601720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality and Readability of English-Language Internet Information for Tinnitus.
    Manchaiah V; Dockens AL; Flagge A; Bellon-Harn M; Azios JH; Kelly-Campbell RJ; Andersson G
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 30461391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Health literacy and the Internet: a study on the readability of Australian online health information.
    Cheng C; Dunn M
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2015 Aug; 39(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 25716142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Critical analysis of the quality of internet resources for patients with varicose veins.
    Yan Q; Field AR; Jensen KJ; Goei C; Jiang Z; Davies MG
    J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2021 Jul; 9(4):1017-1024.e7. PubMed ID: 33340728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Readability analysis of online health information on preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP).
    Kecojevic A; Basch CH; Garcia P
    Public Health; 2020 May; 182():53-55. PubMed ID: 32171091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Readability and content gaps in online epilepsy surgery materials as potential health literacy and shared-decision-making barriers.
    Seneviratne NU; Ho SY; Boro A; Correa DJ
    Epilepsia Open; 2023 Dec; 8(4):1566-1575. PubMed ID: 37805810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Readability of online patient education materials for parents after a failed newborn hearing screen.
    Sax L; Razak A; Shetty K; Cohen M; Levi J
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Oct; 125():168-174. PubMed ID: 31326734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur.
    Arslan D; Sami Tutar M; Kozanhan B; Bagci Z
    Cardiol Young; 2020 Mar; 30(3):328-336. PubMed ID: 31875800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Internet-Based Resources Frequently Provide Inaccurate and Out-of-Date Recommendations on Preoperative Fasting: A Systematic Review.
    Roughead T; Sewell D; Ryerson CJ; Fisher JH; Flexman AM
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Dec; 123(6):1463-1468. PubMed ID: 27644057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Readability of websites containing information on dental implants.
    Jayaratne YS; Anderson NK; Zwahlen RA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Dec; 25(12):1319-24. PubMed ID: 24148074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Readability analysis of online resources related to lung cancer.
    Weiss KD; Vargas CR; Ho OA; Chuang DJ; Weiss J; Lee BT
    J Surg Res; 2016 Nov; 206(1):90-97. PubMed ID: 27916381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Readability of Wikipedia Pages on Autoimmune Disorders: Systematic Quantitative Assessment.
    Watad A; Bragazzi NL; Brigo F; Sharif K; Amital H; McGonagle D; Shoenfeld Y; Adawi M
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Jul; 19(7):e260. PubMed ID: 28720555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accessibility of online self-management support websites for people with osteoarthritis: A text content analysis.
    Chapman L; Brooks C; Lawson J; Russell C; Adams J
    Chronic Illn; 2019 Mar; 15(1):27-40. PubMed ID: 29254372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Readability assessment of online tracheostomy care resources.
    Kong KA; Hu A
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Feb; 152(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 25450410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Readability of online COVID-19 health information: a comparison between four English speaking countries.
    Worrall AP; Connolly MJ; O'Neill A; O'Doherty M; Thornton KP; McNally C; McConkey SJ; de Barra E
    BMC Public Health; 2020 Nov; 20(1):1635. PubMed ID: 33183297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Readability and quality of online information for patients pertaining to revision knee arthroplasty: An objective analysis.
    Murphy B; Irwin S; Condon F; Kennedy C
    Surgeon; 2022 Dec; 20(6):e366-e370. PubMed ID: 35034835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.