BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33824934)

  • 1. #Election2020: the first public Twitter dataset on the 2020 US Presidential election.
    Chen E; Deb A; Ferrara E
    J Comput Soc Sci; 2022; 5(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 33824934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.
    Patterson MM; Bigler RS; Pahlke E; Brown CS; Hayes AR; Ramirez MC; Nelson A
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2019 Sep; 84(3):7-185. PubMed ID: 31503346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 280 characters to the White House: predicting 2020 U.S. presidential elections from twitter data.
    Rizk R; Rizk D; Rizk F; Hsu S
    Comput Math Organ Theory; 2023 Mar; ():1-28. PubMed ID: 37360912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. First public dataset to study 2023 Turkish general election.
    Najafi A; Mugurtay N; Zouzou Y; Demirci E; Demirkiran S; Karadeniz HA; Varol O
    Sci Rep; 2024 Apr; 14(1):8794. PubMed ID: 38627434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A large-scale sentiment analysis of tweets pertaining to the 2020 US presidential election.
    Ali RH; Pinto G; Lawrie E; Linstead EJ
    J Big Data; 2022; 9(1):79. PubMed ID: 35729897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Indonesian presidential election sentiment: Dataset of response public before 2024.
    Firdaus AA; Yudhana A; Riadi I; Mahsun
    Data Brief; 2024 Feb; 52():109993. PubMed ID: 38226041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gains in health insurance coverage explain variation in Democratic vote share in the 2008-2016 presidential elections.
    Hollingsworth A; Soni A; Carroll AE; Cawley J; Simon K
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0214206. PubMed ID: 30946752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Political environment and mortality rates in the United States, 2001-19: population based cross sectional analysis.
    Warraich HJ; Kumar P; Nasir K; Joynt Maddox KE; Wadhera RK
    BMJ; 2022 Jun; 377():e069308. PubMed ID: 35672032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Studying topic engagement and synergy among candidates for 2020 US Elections.
    Baxi MK; Sharma R; Mago V
    Soc Netw Anal Min; 2022; 12(1):136. PubMed ID: 36118938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Another issue comes out: gay rights policy voting in recent U.S. presidential elections.
    Rhodebeck LA
    J Homosex; 2015; 62(6):701-34. PubMed ID: 25530286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Independent Relationship of Changes in Death Rates with Changes in US Presidential Voting.
    Goldman L; Lim MP; Chen Q; Jin P; Muennig P; Vagelos A
    J Gen Intern Med; 2019 Mar; 34(3):363-371. PubMed ID: 30187378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Public interest in Cannabis during election season: a Google Trends analysis.
    Torgerson T; Roberts W; Lester D; Khojasteh J; Vassar M
    J Cannabis Res; 2020 Sep; 2(1):31. PubMed ID: 33526135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diverging Life Expectancies and Voting Patterns in the 2016 US Presidential Election.
    Bor J
    Am J Public Health; 2017 Oct; 107(10):1560-1562. PubMed ID: 28817322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The footprint of campaign strategies in Farsi Twitter: A case for 2021 Iranian presidential election.
    Mohammadi S; Moradi P; Firouzabadi SM; Jafari G
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(7):e0270822. PubMed ID: 35900976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy on Social Media: Building a Public Twitter Data Set of Antivaccine Content, Vaccine Misinformation, and Conspiracies.
    Muric G; Wu Y; Ferrara E
    JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2021 Nov; 7(11):e30642. PubMed ID: 34653016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Online engagement with 2020 election misinformation and turnout in the 2021 Georgia runoff election.
    Green J; Hobbs W; McCabe S; Lazer D
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Aug; 119(34):e2115900119. PubMed ID: 35972960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Life expectancy and voting patterns in the 2020 U.S. presidential election.
    Curtis LH; Hoffman MN; Califf RM; Hammill BG
    SSM Popul Health; 2021 Sep; 15():100840. PubMed ID: 34169139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors associated with post-election psychological distress: The case of the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
    Pitcho-Prelorentzos S; Kaniasty K; Hamama-Raz Y; Goodwin R; Ring L; Ben-Ezra M; Mahat-Shamir M
    Psychiatry Res; 2018 Aug; 266():1-4. PubMed ID: 29787806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Social media's contribution to political misperceptions in U.S. Presidential elections.
    Garrett RK
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0213500. PubMed ID: 30917154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Symbolic disempowerment and Donald Trump's 2016 presidential election: Mental health responses among Latinx and white populations.
    Morey BN; GarcĂ­a SJ; Nieri T; Bruckner TA; Link BG
    Soc Sci Med; 2021 Nov; 289():114417. PubMed ID: 34656819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.