These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33824934)

  • 21. Social media's contribution to political misperceptions in U.S. Presidential elections.
    Garrett RK
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0213500. PubMed ID: 30917154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Analysis and mining of an election-based network using large-scale twitter data: a retrospective study.
    Chakraborty A; Mukherjee N
    Soc Netw Anal Min; 2023; 13(1):74. PubMed ID: 37122615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Online negative sentiment towards Mexicans and Hispanics and impact on mental well-being: A time-series analysis of social media data during the 2016 United States presidential election.
    Hswen Y; Qin Q; Williams DR; Viswanath K; Subramanian SV; Brownstein JS
    Heliyon; 2020 Sep; 6(9):e04910. PubMed ID: 33005781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Demographic change and the 2016 presidential election.
    Maggio C
    Soc Sci Res; 2021 Mar; 95():102459. PubMed ID: 33653583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Elections, news cycles, and attention to disasters.
    Bright CF
    Disaster Prev Manag; 2017; 26(4):471-478. PubMed ID: 30443109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Voter emotional responses and voting behaviour in the 2020 US presidential election.
    Lench HC; Fernandez L; Reed N; Raibley E; Levine LJ; Salsedo K
    Cogn Emot; 2024 May; ():1-14. PubMed ID: 38764190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Social influence and political mobilization: Further evidence from a randomized experiment in the 2012 U.S. presidential election.
    Jones JJ; Bond RM; Bakshy E; Eckles D; Fowler JH
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0173851. PubMed ID: 28445476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. From Twitter to Aso-Rock: A sentiment analysis framework for understanding Nigeria 2023 presidential election.
    Olabanjo O; Wusu A; Afisi O; Asokere M; Padonu R; Olabanjo O; Ojo O; Folorunso O; Aribisala B; Mazzara M
    Heliyon; 2023 May; 9(5):e16085. PubMed ID: 37215756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Validation of Twitter opinion trends with national polling aggregates: Hillary Clinton vs Donald Trump.
    Bovet A; Morone F; Makse HA
    Sci Rep; 2018 Jun; 8(1):8673. PubMed ID: 29875364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Anchoring in the past, tweeting from the present: Cognitive bias in journalists' word choices.
    Lee J; Hamilton JT
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(3):e0263730. PubMed ID: 35235575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Presidential, But Not Prime Minister, Candidates With Lower Pitched Voices Stand a Better Chance of Winning the Election in Conservative Countries.
    Banai B; Laustsen L; Banai IP; Bovan K
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(2):1474704918758736. PubMed ID: 29911405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. County community health associations of net voting shift in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
    Wasfy JH; Stewart C; Bhambhani V
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0185051. PubMed ID: 28968415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of fake news in Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election.
    Bovet A; Makse HA
    Nat Commun; 2019 Jan; 10(1):7. PubMed ID: 30602729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Latino early adolescents' psychological and physiological responses during the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
    Zeiders KH; Nair RL; Hoyt LT; Pace TWW; Cruze A
    Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol; 2020 Apr; 26(2):169-175. PubMed ID: 31436441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Should Biden Apologize for Trump? National Remorse and the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election.
    Smith N
    Society; 2020; 57(6):698-703. PubMed ID: 33424058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Moral-Language Use by U.S. Political Elites.
    Wang SN; Inbar Y
    Psychol Sci; 2021 Jan; 32(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 33306432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Underlying socio-political processes behind the 2016 US election.
    Bryden J; Silverman E
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0214854. PubMed ID: 30964900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Polarization and Democratic Accountability in the 2020 Presidential Election.
    Bitecofer RL
    Society; 2020; 57(5):507-510. PubMed ID: 33144744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Obesity Prevalence and Voting Behaviors in the 2016 US Presidential Election.
    An R; Ji M
    Am J Health Behav; 2018 Sep; 42(5):21-31. PubMed ID: 30688638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Assessing the Russian Internet Research Agency's impact on the political attitudes and behaviors of American Twitter users in late 2017.
    Bail CA; Guay B; Maloney E; Combs A; Hillygus DS; Merhout F; Freelon D; Volfovsky A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Jan; 117(1):243-250. PubMed ID: 31767743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.