176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33825929)
1. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging facilitates the selection of patients prior to fertility-sparing management of endometrial cancer.
Himoto Y; Lakhman Y; Fujii S; Morita S; Mueller JJ; Leitao MM; Kido A
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Sep; 46(9):4410-4419. PubMed ID: 33825929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Biparametric and Multiparametric MRI for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection With PI-RADS Version 2.1.
Tamada T; Kido A; Yamamoto A; Takeuchi M; Miyaji Y; Moriya T; Sone T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Jan; 53(1):283-291. PubMed ID: 32614123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prostate cancer detection with biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) by readers with different experience: performance and comparison with multiparametric (mpMRI).
Gatti M; Faletti R; Calleris G; Giglio J; Berzovini C; Gentile F; Marra G; Misischi F; Molinaro L; Bergamasco L; Gontero P; Papotti M; Fonio P
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 May; 44(5):1883-1893. PubMed ID: 30788558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Benefit of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging for prostate cancer detection depending on readers experience in prostate MRI.
Ziayee F; Schimmöller L; Boschheidgen M; Kasprowski L; Al-Monajjed R; Quentin M; Radtke JP; Albers P; Antoch G; Ullrich T
Clin Radiol; 2024 Mar; 79(3):e468-e474. PubMed ID: 38185579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biparametric versus Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Assessing Muscle Invasion in Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma with Variant Histology Using the Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System.
Arita Y; Kwee TC; Woo S; Shigeta K; Ishii R; Okawara N; Edo H; Waseda Y; Vargas HA
Eur Urol Focus; 2024 Jan; 10(1):131-138. PubMed ID: 37633790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic accuracy of biparametric versus multiparametric prostate MRI: assessment of contrast benefit in clinical practice.
Zawaideh JP; Sala E; Shaida N; Koo B; Warren AY; Carmisciano L; Saeb-Parsy K; Gnanapragasam VJ; Kastner C; Barrett T
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jul; 30(7):4039-4049. PubMed ID: 32166495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of biparametric and multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Xu L; Zhang G; Shi B; Liu Y; Zou T; Yan W; Xiao Y; Xue H; Feng F; Lei J; Jin Z; Sun H
Cancer Imaging; 2019 Dec; 19(1):90. PubMed ID: 31864408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of biparametric versus multiparametric prostate MRI for the detection of extracapsular extension and seminal vesicle invasion in biopsy naïve patients.
Caglic I; Sushentsev N; Shah N; Warren AY; Lamb BW; Barrett T
Eur J Radiol; 2021 Aug; 141():109804. PubMed ID: 34062473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MRI combined with PSA density in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PSA serum levels of 4∼10ng/mL: Biparametric versus multiparametric MRI.
Han C; Liu S; Qin XB; Ma S; Zhu LN; Wang XY
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2020 Apr; 101(4):235-244. PubMed ID: 32063483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Sensitivity and Specificity of Biparametric versus Multiparametric Prostate MRI in the Detection of Prostate Cancer in 431 Men with Elevated Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels.
Pesapane F; Acquasanta M; Meo RD; Agazzi GM; Tantrige P; Codari M; Schiaffino S; Patella F; Esseridou A; Sardanelli F
Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 Jul; 11(7):. PubMed ID: 34359307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Head-to-head comparison of biparametric versus multiparametric MRI of the prostate before robot-assisted transperineal fusion prostate biopsy.
Thaiss WM; Moser S; Hepp T; Kruck S; Rausch S; Scharpf M; Nikolaou K; Stenzl A; Bedke J; Kaufmann S
World J Urol; 2022 Oct; 40(10):2431-2438. PubMed ID: 35922717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biparametric vs multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of prostate cancer in treatment-naïve patients: a diagnostic test accuracy systematic review and meta-analysis.
Alabousi M; Salameh JP; Gusenbauer K; Samoilov L; Jafri A; Yu H; Alabousi A
BJU Int; 2019 Aug; 124(2):209-220. PubMed ID: 30929292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection After a Negative Prebiopsy MRI Examination: Comparison of Biparametric Versus Multiparametric MRI.
Gan JM; Kikano EG; Smith DA; Rao S; Podury R; Wang M; Durieux JC; Paspulati RM; Ponsky L; Ramaiya NH; Tirumani SH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 May; 218(5):859-866. PubMed ID: 34817189
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Prostate cancer local staging using biparametric MRI: assessment and comparison with multiparametric MRI.
Christophe C; Montagne S; Bourrelier S; Roupret M; Barret E; Rozet F; Comperat E; Coté JF; Lucidarme O; Cussenot O; Granger B; Renard-Penna R
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Nov; 132():109350. PubMed ID: 33080549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multiparametric 3T MRI for the prediction of pathological downgrading after radical prostatectomy in patients with biopsy-proven Gleason score 3 + 4 prostate cancer.
Gondo T; Hricak H; Sala E; Zheng J; Moskowitz CS; Bernstein M; Eastham JA; Vargas HA
Eur Radiol; 2014 Dec; 24(12):3161-70. PubMed ID: 25100337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The diagnostic performance in clinically significant prostate cancer with PI-RADS version 2.1: simplified bpMRI versus standard mpMRI.
Song J; Zhao C; Zhang F; Yuan Y; Wang LM; Sah V; Zhang J; Weng W; Yang Z; Wang Z; Wang L
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2023 Feb; 48(2):704-712. PubMed ID: 36464756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of biparametric prostate MRI for prostate cancer in men at risk.
Bass EJ; Pantovic A; Connor M; Gabe R; Padhani AR; Rockall A; Sokhi H; Tam H; Winkler M; Ahmed HU
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2021 Sep; 24(3):596-611. PubMed ID: 33219368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic value of integrated
Zeng Y; Leng X; Liao H; Jiang G; Chen P
Prostate Int; 2022 Jun; 10(2):108-116. PubMed ID: 35510079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Synthetic magnetic resonance imaging for primary prostate cancer evaluation: Diagnostic potential of a non-contrast-enhanced bi-parametric approach enhanced with relaxometry measurements.
Arita Y; Akita H; Fujiwara H; Hashimoto M; Shigeta K; Kwee TC; Yoshida S; Kosaka T; Okuda S; Oya M; Jinzaki M
Eur J Radiol Open; 2022; 9():100403. PubMed ID: 35242886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection of recurrent prostate cancer after primary radiation therapy: An evaluation of the role of multiparametric 3T magnetic resonance imaging with endorectal coil.
Zattoni F; Kawashima A; Morlacco A; Davis BJ; Nehra AK; Mynderse LA; Froemming AT; Jeffrey Karnes R
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2017; 7(1):42-49. PubMed ID: 27527896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
