177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33825929)
61. A predictive model based on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging and clinical parameters for improved risk assessment and selection of biopsy-naïve men for prostate biopsies.
Boesen L; Thomsen FB; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Bisbjerg R; Thomsen HS; Jakobsen H
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2019 Dec; 22(4):609-616. PubMed ID: 30988407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Abbreviated Protocols
Stanzione A; Ponsiglione A; Cuocolo R; Cocozza S; Picchi SG; Stilo S; Persico F; Creta M; Longo N; Imbriaco M
Anticancer Res; 2019 Aug; 39(8):4449-4454. PubMed ID: 31366543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Evaluation of depth of myometrial invasion and overall staging in endometrial cancer: comparison of diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
Beddy P; Moyle P; Kataoka M; Yamamoto AK; Joubert I; Lomas D; Crawford R; Sala E
Radiology; 2012 Feb; 262(2):530-7. PubMed ID: 22114239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. [Clinical impact of abbreviated unenhanced prostate protocols in magnetic resonance imaging].
Solyanik O; Heimer M
Radiologe; 2021 Sep; 61(9):810-817. PubMed ID: 34297140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Diagnostic accuracy of biparametric vs multiparametric MRI in clinically significant prostate cancer: Comparison between readers with different experience.
Di Campli E; Delli Pizzi A; Seccia B; Cianci R; d'Annibale M; Colasante A; Cinalli S; Castellan P; Navarra R; Iantorno R; Gabrielli D; Buffone A; Caulo M; Basilico R
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Apr; 101():17-23. PubMed ID: 29571792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. MRI Based Radiomics Compared With the PI-RADS V2.1 in the Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Biparametric vs Multiparametric MRI.
Chen T; Zhang Z; Tan S; Zhang Y; Wei C; Wang S; Zhao W; Qian X; Zhou Z; Shen J; Dai Y; Hu J
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():792456. PubMed ID: 35127499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Is dynamic contrast enhancement still necessary in multiparametric magnetic resonance for diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Liang Z; Hu R; Yang Y; An N; Duo X; Liu Z; Shi S; Liu X
Transl Androl Urol; 2020 Apr; 9(2):553-573. PubMed ID: 32420161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Development and Validation of Multiparametric MRI-based Radiomics Models for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Endometrial Cancer.
Lefebvre TL; Ueno Y; Dohan A; Chatterjee A; Vallières M; Winter-Reinhold E; Saif S; Levesque IR; Zeng XZ; Forghani R; Seuntjens J; Soyer P; Savadjiev P; Reinhold C
Radiology; 2022 Nov; 305(2):375-386. PubMed ID: 35819326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Head-to-head comparison between multiparametric MRI, the partin tables, memorial sloan kettering cancer center nomogram, and CAPRA score in predicting extraprostatic cancer in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Zanelli E; Giannarini G; Cereser L; Zuiani C; Como G; Pizzolitto S; Crestani A; Valotto C; Ficarra V; Girometti R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Nov; 50(5):1604-1613. PubMed ID: 30957321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Preoperative prediction of deep myometrial invasion and tumor grade for stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma: a simple method of measurement on DWI.
Yan B; Liang X; Zhao T; Niu C; Ding C; Liu W
Eur Radiol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):838-848. PubMed ID: 30039225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Clinical relevance of total choline (tCho) quantification in suspicious lesions on multiparametric breast MRI.
Sodano C; Clauser P; Dietzel M; Kapetas P; Pinker K; Helbich TH; Gussew A; Baltzer PA
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jun; 30(6):3371-3382. PubMed ID: 32065286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Combined subjective and quantitative analysis of magnetic resonance images could improve the diagnostic performance of deep myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer.
Deng L; Wang QP; Yan R; Yu N; Bai L; Duan XY; Guo YM
Clin Imaging; 2017; 43():69-73. PubMed ID: 28232207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Negative Predictive Value of Biparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Excluding Significant Prostate Cancer: A Pooled Data Analysis Based on Clinical Data from Four Prospective, Registered Studies.
Knaapila J; Jambor I; Ettala O; Taimen P; Verho J; Perez IM; Kiviniemi A; Pahikkala T; Merisaari H; Lamminen T; Saunavaara J; Aronen HJ; Syvänen KT; Boström PJ
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 May; 7(3):522-531. PubMed ID: 32418878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Multiparametric MRI and auto-fixed volume of interest-based radiomics signature for clinically significant peripheral zone prostate cancer.
Bleker J; Kwee TC; Dierckx RAJO; de Jong IJ; Huisman H; Yakar D
Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1313-1324. PubMed ID: 31776744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Endometrial Cancer: Combined MR Volumetry and Diffusion-weighted Imaging for Assessment of Myometrial and Lymphovascular Invasion and Tumor Grade.
Nougaret S; Reinhold C; Alsharif SS; Addley H; Arceneau J; Molinari N; Guiu B; Sala E
Radiology; 2015 Sep; 276(3):797-808. PubMed ID: 25928157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Visibility of significant prostate cancer on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-do we still need contrast media?
Huebner NA; Korn S; Resch I; Grubmüller B; Gross T; Gale R; Kramer G; Poetsch N; Clauser P; Haitel A; Fajkovic H; Shariat SF; Baltzer PA
Eur Radiol; 2021 Jun; 31(6):3754-3764. PubMed ID: 33263793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Abbreviated Versus Multiparametric Prostate MRI in Active Surveillance for Prostate-Cancer Patients: Comparison of Accuracy and Clinical Utility as a Decisional Tool.
Zattoni F; Maresca S; Dal Moro F; Bednarova I; Randazzo G; Basso G; Reitano G; Giannarini G; Zuiani C; Girometti R
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Feb; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 36832066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Differentiation of uterine low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma from rare leiomyoma variants by magnetic resonance imaging.
Himoto Y; Kido A; Sakata A; Moribata Y; Kurata Y; Suzuki A; Matsumura N; Shitano F; Kawahara S; Kubo S; Umeoka S; Minamiguchi S; Mandai M
Sci Rep; 2021 Sep; 11(1):19124. PubMed ID: 34580348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Rectal preparation significantly improves prostate imaging quality: Assessment of the PI-QUAL score with visual grading characteristics.
Arnoldner MA; Polanec SH; Lazar M; Noori Khadjavi S; Clauser P; Pötsch N; Schwarz-Nemec U; Korn S; Hübner N; Shariat SF; Helbich TH; Baltzer PAT
Eur J Radiol; 2022 Feb; 147():110145. PubMed ID: 35007983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Comparison between biparametric and multiparametric MRI diagnosis strategy for prostate cancer in the peripheral zone using PI-RADS version 2.1.
Zhang J; Xu L; Zhang G; Zhang X; Bai X; Ji Z; Xiao Y; Sun H; Jin Z
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2022 Aug; 47(8):2905-2916. PubMed ID: 35622121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
