These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3382870)

  • 1. Performance assessment of X-ray image intensified television fluoroscopy systems in New Zealand.
    Poletti JL; Le Heron JC
    Br J Radiol; 1988 May; 61(725):393-400. PubMed ID: 3382870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of a quality index in threshold contrast detail detection measurements in television fluoroscopy.
    Gallacher DJ; Mackenzie A; Batchelor S; Lynch J; Saunders JE
    Br J Radiol; 2003 Jul; 76(907):464-72. PubMed ID: 12857706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Threshold contrast detail detectability curves for fluoroscopy and digital acquisition using modern image intensifier systems.
    Evans DS; Mackenzie A; Lawinski CP; Smith D
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Sep; 77(921):751-8. PubMed ID: 15447961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A figure of merit for the assessment of image intensifier systems.
    McRobbie DW; Hancock AP; Castellano IA
    Br J Radiol; 1992 Oct; 65(778):878-84. PubMed ID: 1422661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of radiographic image quality parameters obtained with the REX simulator.
    Magalhaes LA; Drexler GG; deAlmeida CE
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Nov; 147(4):614-8. PubMed ID: 21273198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Image enhancer-television equipment--image quality and dose].
    Larwin K
    Strahlenschutz Forsch Prax; 1986; 27():43-7. PubMed ID: 3705125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of performance of a new digital image intensifier fluoroscopy system.
    Dimov A; Vassileva J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):123-6. PubMed ID: 18469348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An analysis of dose efficiency in image intensified fluoroscopic examinations.
    Bernstein H; Muntz EP
    Med Phys; 1981; 8(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 7322044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality control phantom for flat panel detector X-ray systems.
    Chida K; Kaga Y; Haga Y; Takeda K; Zuguchi M
    Health Phys; 2013 Jan; 104(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 23192093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The design and imaging characteristics of dynamic, solid-state, flat-panel x-ray image detectors for digital fluoroscopy and fluorography.
    Cowen AR; Davies AG; Sivananthan MU
    Clin Radiol; 2008 Oct; 63(10):1073-85. PubMed ID: 18774353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characterization of the veiling glare PSF in x-ray image intensified fluoroscopy.
    Seibert JA; Nalcioglu O; Roeck WW
    Med Phys; 1984; 11(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 6727792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Concerning dose efficiency in image intensified fluoroscopy.
    Bernstein H; Muntz EP
    Med Phys; 1981; 8(6):907. PubMed ID: 7322091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Objective performance measurements versus perceived image quality in intensified fluoroscopic or photospot images.
    Gould RG; Belanger B; Goldberg HI; Moss A
    Radiology; 1980 Dec; 137(3):783-8. PubMed ID: 7444062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measurement of x-ray image intensifier sharpness in the x-ray department.
    Le Heron JC; Poletti JL
    Phys Med Biol; 1988 Jan; 33(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 3353455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative performance of x-ray-intensifying screens.
    Burgess AE; Hicken P
    Radiology; 1982 May; 143(2):551-6. PubMed ID: 7071362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Threshold contrast detail detectability measurement of the fluoroscopic image quality of a dynamic solid-state digital x-ray image detector.
    Davies AG; Cowen AR; Kengyelics SM; Bury RF; Bruijns TJ
    Med Phys; 2001 Jan; 28(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 11213916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Reduction of the radiation exposure in photofluorography by using rare earth-based fluorescent screens].
    Schöfer H; Eder H
    Rofo; 1984 Aug; 141(2):223-6. PubMed ID: 6431550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [X-ray intensifying screens: their effect on the quality of the image and the degree of irradiation].
    Tombak MI; Vlasov PV; Gurvich AM; Gurevich IA; Katomina RV
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1984; (5):80-4. PubMed ID: 6528468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of a simple Leeds test object for rapid assessment of image intensifiers.
    Grant AM; Kehoe TM; Law J
    Br J Radiol; 1987 Oct; 60(718):1019-21. PubMed ID: 3676644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Analysis of frequency-contrast characteristics of digital X-ray image detectors].
    Zelikman MI; Kabanov SP; Kokuev AN; Kruchinin SA; Lobov DP
    Med Tekh; 2006; (5):23-7. PubMed ID: 17133940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.