These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33828790)

  • 1. Testing a Calibration - Free Eye Tracker Prototype at the Kunsthistorisches Museum in Vienna.
    Dare Z; Brinkmann H; Rosenberg R
    J Eye Mov Res; 2020 Nov; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 33828790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effectiveness of labels in digital art experience: psychophysiological and behavioral evidence.
    Castellotti S; D'Agostino O; Del Viva MM
    Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1342667. PubMed ID: 39011289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Art Perception in the Museum: How We Spend Time and Space in Art Exhibitions.
    Carbon CC
    Iperception; 2017; 8(1):2041669517694184. PubMed ID: 28321289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frames as visual links between paintings and the museum environment: an analysis of statistical image properties.
    Redies C; Groß F
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():831. PubMed ID: 24265625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Capturing Aesthetic Experiences With Installation Art: An Empirical Assessment of Emotion, Evaluations, and Mobile Eye Tracking in Olafur Eliasson's "Baroque, Baroque!".
    Pelowski M; Leder H; Mitschke V; Specker E; Gerger G; Tinio PPL; Vaporova E; Bieg T; Husslein-Arco A
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1255. PubMed ID: 30127756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role that composition plays in determining how a viewer looks at landscape art.
    Beelders T; Bergh L
    J Eye Mov Res; 2020 Dec; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 33828794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Viewing Art in Different Contexts.
    Estrada-Gonzalez V; East S; Garbutt M; Spehar B
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():569. PubMed ID: 32300320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Display Makes a Difference: A Mobile Eye Tracking Study on the Perception of Art Before and After a Museum's Rearrangement.
    Reitstätter L; Brinkmann H; Santini T; Specker E; Dare Z; Bakondi F; Miscená A; Kasneci E; Leder H; Rosenberg R
    J Eye Mov Res; 2020 Jun; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 33828792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Art in time and space: context modulates the relation between art experience and viewing time.
    Brieber D; Nadal M; Leder H; Rosenberg R
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e99019. PubMed ID: 24892829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does Gallery Lighting Really Have an Impact on Appreciation of Art? An Ecologically Valid Study of Lighting Changes and the Assessment and Emotional Experience With Representational and Abstract Paintings.
    Pelowski M; Graser A; Specker E; Forster M; von Hinüber J; Leder H
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2148. PubMed ID: 31636577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Methodology and application of gc-ms to study altered organic binding media from objects of the Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna.
    Pitthard V; Griesser M; Stanek S
    Ann Chim; 2006; 96(9-10):561-73. PubMed ID: 17172209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Aesthetic Evaluation of Digitally Reproduced Art Images.
    Reymond C; Pelowski M; Opwis K; Takala T; Mekler ED
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():615575. PubMed ID: 33362676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Titles and Semantic Violations Affect Eye Movements When Viewing Contemporary Paintings.
    Ganczarek J; Pietras K; Stolińska A; Szubielska M
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2022; 16():808330. PubMed ID: 35308608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reflections on observing faces in art.
    Battaglia A; Carey JC
    Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet; 2021 Jun; 187(2):144-147. PubMed ID: 33982855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Eye-tracking and learning experience: gaze trajectories to better understand the behavior of memorial visitors.
    Mesmoudi S; Hommet S; Peschanski D
    J Eye Mov Res; 2020 May; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 33828795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceived cognitive challenge predicts eye movements while viewing contemporary paintings.
    Ganczarek J; Pietras K; Rosiek R
    Psych J; 2020 Aug; 9(4):490-506. PubMed ID: 32462771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scenting the Anosmic Cube: On the Use of Ambient Scent in the Context of the Art Gallery or Museum.
    Spence C
    Iperception; 2020; 11(6):2041669520966628. PubMed ID: 33282169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Influence of Art Expertise and Training on Emotion and Preference Ratings for Representational and Abstract Artworks.
    van Paasschen J; Bacci F; Melcher DP
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0134241. PubMed ID: 26244368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ecological Art Experience: How We Can Gain Experimental Control While Preserving Ecologically Valid Settings and Contexts.
    Carbon CC
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():800. PubMed ID: 32499736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gaze stability of observers watching Op Art pictures.
    Zanker JM; Doyle M; Robin W
    Perception; 2003; 32(9):1037-49. PubMed ID: 14651318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.