These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33828873)

  • 21. Effects of pendulum appliance versus clear aligners in the vertical dimension during Class II malocclusion treatment: a randomized prospective clinical trial.
    Lione R; Balboni A; Di Fazio V; Pavoni C; Cozza P
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Oct; 22(1):441. PubMed ID: 36217134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cephalometric effects of the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion treatment.
    Patel MP; Henriques JF; Freitas KM; Grec RH
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(3):44-51. PubMed ID: 25162565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of two intraoral molar distalization appliances: distal jet versus pendulum.
    Chiu PP; McNamara JA; Franchi L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Sep; 128(3):353-65. PubMed ID: 16168332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Molar distalization with a pendulum appliance K-loop combination.
    Acar AG; Gürsoy S; Dinçer M
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 20231213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Intraosseous screw-supported upper molar distalization.
    Gelgör IE; Büyükyilmaz T; Karaman AI; Dolanmaz D; Kalayci A
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):838-50. PubMed ID: 15673149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Anchorage quality of deciduous molars versus premolars for molar distalization with a pendulum appliance.
    Kinzinger GS; Gross U; Fritz UB; Diedrich PR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Mar; 127(3):314-23. PubMed ID: 15775946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Changes consequent to maxillary molar distalization with the bone-anchored pendulum appliance.
    Cambiano AO; Janson G; Fuziy A; Garib DG; Lorenzoni DC
    J Orthod Sci; 2017; 6(4):141-146. PubMed ID: 29119095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of zygoma-gear appliance for unilateral maxillary molar distalization: A prospective clinical study.
    Kilkis D; Celikoglu M; Nur M; Bayram M; Candirli C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Dec; 150(6):989-996. PubMed ID: 27894548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of molar distalization with the fast back appliance.
    Alkasaby AA; Abdelnaby YL; Hammad SM
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2013; 24(4):25-31. PubMed ID: 24640072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An active, skeletally anchored transpalatal appliance for derotation, distalization and vertical control of maxillary first molars.
    Hourfar J; Ludwig B; Kanavakis G
    J Orthod; 2014 Sep; 41 Suppl 1():S24-32. PubMed ID: 25138362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of unilateral molar distalization with a modified pendulum appliance.
    Schütze SF; Gedrange T; Zellmann MR; Harzer W
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 May; 131(5):600-8. PubMed ID: 17482078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A new approach in maxillary molar distalization: intraoral bodily molar distalizer.
    Keles A; Sayinsu K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jan; 117(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 10629518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of the Pendulum appliance and the Jones Jig: A prospective comparative study.
    Shetty S; Maurya R; Raj HVP; Patil A
    Eur J Dent; 2017; 11(3):323-329. PubMed ID: 28932141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of the effects of the hybrid Pendulum in comparison with the conventional Pendulum appliance.
    Bozkaya E; Tortop T; Yüksel S; Kaygısız E
    Angle Orthod; 2020 Mar; 90(2):194-201. PubMed ID: 31642688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Osseointegrated implants with pendulum springs for maxillary molar distalization: a cephalometric study.
    Onçağ G; Seçkin O; Dinçer B; Arikan F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):16-26. PubMed ID: 17208102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fabrication and evaluation of a noncompliant molar distalizing appliance: bonded molar distalizer.
    Sodagar A; Ahmad Akhoundi MS; Rafighii A; Arab S
    J Dent (Tehran); 2011; 8(3):107-16. PubMed ID: 22457837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Comparison of two different methods of rapid expansion combined with maxillary protraction in the treatment of skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion].
    Han L; Li JL; Li BC; Li H
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2023 Apr; 58(4):318-328. PubMed ID: 37005778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Extraction of maxillary first molars improves second and third molar inclinations in Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Livas C; Halazonetis DJ; Booij JW; Katsaros C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):377-82. PubMed ID: 21889082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Treatment effects of a modified palatal anchorage plate for distalization evaluated with cone-beam computed tomography.
    Kook YA; Bayome M; Trang VT; Kim HJ; Park JH; Kim KB; Behrents RG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jul; 146(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 24974998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Maxillary molar distalization with noncompliance intramaxillary appliances in Class II malocclusion. A systematic review.
    Antonarakis GS; Kiliaridis S
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Nov; 78(6):1133-40. PubMed ID: 18947282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.