These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33828960)

  • 1. Accuracy of maxillofacial prototypes fabricated by different 3-dimensional printing technologies using multi-slice and cone-beam computed tomography.
    Yousefi F; Shokri A; Farhadian M; Vafaei F; Forutan F
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2021 Mar; 51(1):41-47. PubMed ID: 33828960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of intraoral scanning and CBCT to generate digital and 3D-printed casts by fused deposition modeling and digital light processing.
    de Freitas BN; Mendonça LM; Cruvinel PB; de Lacerda TJ; Leite FGJ; Oliveira-Santos C; Tirapelli C
    J Dent; 2023 Jan; 128():104387. PubMed ID: 36496106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability and accuracy of cone beam computed tomography versus conventional multidetector computed tomography for image-guided craniofacial implant planning: An in vitro study.
    Dings JP; Verhamme L; Merkx MA; Xi T; Meijer GJ; Maal TJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):665–672. PubMed ID: 30934042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of Cone Beam Computed Tomography Systems in Visualizing the Cortical Plate in 3D Image Reconstruction: An
    Shokri A; Jamalpour MR; Eskandarloo A; Godiny M; Amini P; Khavid A
    Open Dent J; 2018; 12():586-595. PubMed ID: 30288182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantification of bone quality using different cone beam computed tomography devices: Accuracy assessment for edentulous human mandibles.
    Van Dessel J; Nicolielo LF; Huang Y; Slagmolen P; Politis C; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9(4):411-424. PubMed ID: 27990508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparative evaluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Multi-Slice CT (MSCT). Part II: On 3D model accuracy.
    Liang X; Lambrichts I; Sun Y; Denis K; Hassan B; Li L; Pauwels R; Jacobs R
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Aug; 75(2):270-4. PubMed ID: 19423257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Fabrication and accuracy research on 3D printing dental model based on cone beam computed tomography digital modeling].
    Zhang HR; Yin LF; Liu YL; Yan LY; Wang N; Liu G; An XL; Liu B
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Apr; 36(2):156-161. PubMed ID: 29779276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) generated tooth replicas with application in autotransplantation.
    Lee CKJ; Foong KWC; Sim YF; Chew MT
    J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103908. PubMed ID: 34856326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative Analysis of Fused Deposition Modeling and Digital Light Processing Techniques for Dimensional Accuracy in Clear Aligner Manufacturing.
    Grzebieluch W; Grajzer M; Mikulewicz M
    Med Sci Monit; 2023 Aug; 29():e940922. PubMed ID: 37533235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of MDCT and CBCT in three-dimensional evaluation of the oropharynx morphology.
    Chen H; van Eijnatten M; Aarab G; Forouzanfar T; de Lange J; van der Stelt P; Lobbezoo F; Wolff J
    Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jan; 40(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 28453722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of 3-dimensional printing technologies on the precision, trueness, and accuracy of printed retainers.
    Naeem OA; Bencharit S; Yang IH; Stilianoudakis SC; Carrico C; Tüfekçi E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Apr; 161(4):582-591. PubMed ID: 35337648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the fused deposition modeling and the digital light processing techniques in terms of dimensional accuracy of printing dental models used for the fabrication of clear aligners.
    Jaber ST; Hajeer MY; Khattab TZ; Mahaini L
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2021 Aug; 7(4):591-600. PubMed ID: 33258297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy assessment of prototypes produced using multi-slice and cone-beam computed tomography.
    Primo BT; Presotto AC; de Oliveira HW; Gassen HT; Miguens SA; Silva AN; Hernandez PA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Oct; 41(10):1291-5. PubMed ID: 22578568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy and reliability of different cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices for structural analysis of alveolar bone in comparison with multislice CT and micro-CT.
    Van Dessel J; Nicolielo LF; Huang Y; Coudyzer W; Salmon B; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2017; 10(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 28327698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of 3D Printed Models Created by Two Technologies of Printers with Different Designs of Model Base.
    Rungrojwittayakul O; Kan JY; Shiozaki K; Swamidass RS; Goodacre BJ; Goodacre CJ; Lozada JL
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):124-128. PubMed ID: 31498957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of commercial 3D printers for the fabrication of surgical guides in dental implantology.
    Rouzé l'Alzit F; Cade R; Naveau A; Babilotte J; Meglioli M; Catros S
    J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103909. PubMed ID: 34852291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of three-dimensional, paper-based models generated using a low-cost, three-dimensional printer.
    Olszewski R; Szymor P; Kozakiewicz M
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1847-52. PubMed ID: 25176496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of different 3D printers in terms of dimensional stability by image data of a dry human mandible obtained from CBCT and CT.
    Peker Ozturk H; Ayyıldız S
    Int J Artif Organs; 2024 Jan; 47(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 37981804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Trueness of cone-beam computed tomography-derived skull models fabricated by different technology-based three-dimensional printers.
    Wang X; Shujaat S; Shaheen E; Ferraris E; Jacobs R
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jun; 23(1):397. PubMed ID: 37328901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy Assessment of Three-dimensional Surface Reconstructions of In vivo Teeth from Cone-beam Computed Tomography.
    Sang YH; Hu HC; Lu SH; Wu YW; Li WR; Tang ZH
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2016 Jun; 129(12):1464-70. PubMed ID: 27270544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.