112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3383066)
1. Cervical cancer screening: a time for reappraisal in Canada.
Miller AB
Can J Public Health; 1988; 79(2):90-1. PubMed ID: 3383066
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the impact of screening for cancer of the cervix.
Miller AB
IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):149-60. PubMed ID: 3570400
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Cervical cancer screening: the time for reappraisal.
Skrabanek P
Can J Public Health; 1988; 79(2):86-9. PubMed ID: 3383065
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Screening and cervical cancer.
Lancet; 1979 Jan; 1(8106):40-1. PubMed ID: 83483
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Lessons from a cervical screening programme: are they transferable?
Fleischl J
Nurs Prax N Z; 1993 Jul; 8(2):34-7. PubMed ID: 8364340
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of screening on the incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in Finland.
Hakulinen T; Hakama M
Nowotwory; 1985; 35(4):290-6. PubMed ID: 3831943
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Population screening for cervical cancer.
Med J Aust; 1977 Jan 1-8; 1(1-2):2-3. PubMed ID: 840073
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Progress in screening for cervical cancer.
Stuart GC; Krepart GV; Drouin P; Paraskevas M
CMAJ; 1996 Oct; 155(8):1037. PubMed ID: 8873624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Is cervical cancer increasing among young women in Canada?
Arraiz GA; Wigle DT; Mao Y
Can J Public Health; 1990; 81(5):396-7. PubMed ID: 2253159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Screening for cancer of the cervix.
Stuart GC; O'Connell G; Ferenczy A
CMAJ; 1991 Nov; 145(10):1195. PubMed ID: 1933696
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Screening for squamous cervical cancer--the duration of low risk following negative results in cervical cytology test: introduction. IARC Working Group on Cervical Cancer Screening.
IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):15-24. PubMed ID: 3570401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Cervical cancer screening programs. II. Screening for carcinoma of the cervix.
Can Med Assoc J; 1976 Jun; 114(11):1013-26. PubMed ID: 776379
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The epidemiological basis for evaluating different screening policies.
Day NE
IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):199-212. PubMed ID: 3570405
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The (in)efficiency of cervical screening in Europe.
Miller AB
Eur J Cancer; 2002 Feb; 38(3):321-6. PubMed ID: 11818195
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening the only option to prevent cervical cancer.
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2005; 44(159):I. PubMed ID: 16554856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Report of a National Workshop on Screening for Cancer of the Cervix.
Miller AB; Anderson G; Brisson J; Laidlaw J; Le Pitre N; Malcolmson P; Mirwaldt P; Stuart G; Sullivan W
CMAJ; 1991 Nov; 145(10):1301-25. PubMed ID: 1933712
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Every encounter is an opportunity for recommending breast and cervical cancer screening in women. Alaska Breast & Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.
Alaska Med; 2000; 42(2):46-7. PubMed ID: 10916858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Cervical cancer screening.
S Afr Med J; 1977 Feb; 51(6):150. PubMed ID: 757956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A screening programme for cervical cancer that worked.
Hakama M; Louhivuori K
Cancer Surv; 1988; 7(3):403-16. PubMed ID: 3242792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervical cancer screening in Iceland: a case-control study.
Geirsson G; Kristiansdottir R; Sigurdsson K; Moss S; Tulinius H
IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):37-41. PubMed ID: 3570413
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
