These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33830974)

  • 21. Biological plausibility in environmental health systematic reviews: a GRADE concept paper.
    Whaley P; Piggott T; Morgan RL; Hoffmann S; Tsaioun K; Schwingshackl L; Ansari MT; Thayer KA; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Jun; 146():32-46. PubMed ID: 35219805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The GRADE approach, Part 2: Evidence to decision frameworksoutlining decision-making in health.
    Quilodrán C; Kirmayr M; Valente B; Pérez-Bracchiglione J; Garegnani L; Franco JVA
    Medwave; 2021 May; 21(4):e8182. PubMed ID: 34086664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Similar Outcomes of Web-Based and Face-to-Face Training of the GRADE Approach for the Certainty of Evidence: Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Tokalić R; Poklepović Peričić T; Marušić A
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Jun; 25():e43928. PubMed ID: 37279050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Indirectness (transferability) is critical when considering existing economic evaluations for GRADE clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review.
    Riva JJ; Bhatt M; Martins CC; Brunarski DJ; Busse JW; Xie F; Schünemann HJ; Brozek JL
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Aug; 148():81-92. PubMed ID: 35462047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Advances in the GRADE approach to rate the certainty in estimates from a network meta-analysis.
    Brignardello-Petersen R; Bonner A; Alexander PE; Siemieniuk RA; Furukawa TA; Rochwerg B; Hazlewood GS; Alhazzani W; Mustafa RA; Murad MH; Puhan MA; Schünemann HJ; Guyatt GH;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jan; 93():36-44. PubMed ID: 29051107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. GRADE guidance 35: update on rating imprecision for assessing contextualized certainty of evidence and making decisions.
    Schünemann HJ; Neumann I; Hultcrantz M; Brignardello-Petersen R; Zeng L; Murad MH; Izcovich A; Morgano GP; Baldeh T; Santesso N; Cuello CG; Mbuagbaw L; Guyatt G; Wiercioch W; Piggott T; De Beer H; Vinceti M; Mathioudakis AG; Mayer MG; Mustafa R; Filippini T; Iorio A; Nieuwlaat R; Marcucci M; Coello PA; Bonovas S; Piovani D; Tomlinson G; Akl EA;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Oct; 150():225-242. PubMed ID: 35934266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. GRADE guidelines 32: GRADE offers guidance on choosing targets of GRADE certainty of evidence ratings.
    Zeng L; Brignardello-Petersen R; Hultcrantz M; Siemieniuk RAC; Santesso N; Traversy G; Izcovich A; Sadeghirad B; Alexander PE; Devji T; Rochwerg B; Murad MH; Morgan R; Christensen R; Schünemann HJ; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Sep; 137():163-175. PubMed ID: 33857619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction - GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables].
    Langer G; Meerpohl JJ; Perleth M; Gartlehner G; Kaminski-Hartenthaler A; Schünemann H
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2012; 106(5):357-68. PubMed ID: 22818160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. GRADE Guidance: 31. Assessing the certainty across a body of evidence for comparative test accuracy.
    Yang B; Mustafa RA; Bossuyt PM; Brozek J; Hultcrantz M; Leeflang MMG; Schünemann HJ; Langendam MW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Aug; 136():146-156. PubMed ID: 33864930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Applying Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) to diagnostic tests was challenging but doable.
    Gopalakrishna G; Mustafa RA; Davenport C; Scholten RJ; Hyde C; Brozek J; Schünemann HJ; Bossuyt PM; Leeflang MM; Langendam MW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Jul; 67(7):760-8. PubMed ID: 24725643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Interpreting GRADE's levels of certainty or quality of the evidence: GRADE for statisticians, considering review information size or less emphasis on imprecision?
    Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jul; 75():6-15. PubMed ID: 27063205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evidence-based urology: understanding GRADE methodology.
    Gonzalez-Padilla DA; Dahm P
    Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Nov; 7(6):1230-1233. PubMed ID: 34598913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. GRADE guidance 36: updates to GRADE's approach to addressing inconsistency.
    Guyatt G; Zhao Y; Mayer M; Briel M; Mustafa R; Izcovich A; Hultcrantz M; Iorio A; Alba AC; Foroutan F; Sun X; Schunemann H; DeBeer H; Akl EA; Christensen R; Schandelmaier S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Jun; 158():70-83. PubMed ID: 36898507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. GRADE guidance 23: considering cost-effectiveness evidence in moving from evidence to health-related recommendations.
    Xie F; Shemilt I; Vale L; Ruiz F; Drummond MF; Lord J; Herrmann KH; Rojas MX; Zhang Y; Canelo-Aybar C; Alonso-Coello P; Shamliyan T; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Oct; 162():135-144. PubMed ID: 37597696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Synthesis, grading, and presentation of evidence in guidelines: article 7 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.
    Guyatt G; Akl EA; Oxman A; Wilson K; Puhan MA; Wilt T; Gutterman D; Woodhead M; Antman EM; Schünemann HJ;
    Proc Am Thorac Soc; 2012 Dec; 9(5):256-61. PubMed ID: 23256168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. GRADE guidance 37: rating imprecision in a body of evidence on test accuracy.
    Mustafa RA; El Mikati IK; Murad MH; Hultcrantz M; Steingart KR; Yang B; Leeflang MMG; Akl EA; Dahm P; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2024 Jan; 165():111189. PubMed ID: 38613246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The impact of an online course on agreement rates of the certainty of evidence assessment using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Approach: a before-and-after study.
    Dorneles G; Stein C; Araujo CP; Parahiba S; da Rosa B; Gräf DD; Belli KC; Basmaji J; Maior MDCLS; Vidal ÁT; Colpani V; Falavigna M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2024 Aug; 172():111407. PubMed ID: 38838964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Use of GRADE in evidence syntheses published in high-impact-factor nutrition journals: A methodological survey.
    Werner SS; Binder N; Toews I; Schünemann HJ; Meerpohl JJ; Schwingshackl L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Jul; 135():54-69. PubMed ID: 33588024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Simultaneous evaluation of the imprecision and inconsistency domains of GRADE can be performed using prediction intervals.
    Murad MH; Morgan RL; Falck-Ytter Y; Mustafa RA; Sultan S; Dahm P; Siedler MR; Altayar O; Davitkov P; Naqvi SAA; Riaz IB; Wang Z; Lin L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2024 Nov; 175():111543. PubMed ID: 39322122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The impact of climate change on health needs structured evidence assessment and an evidence to action framework to make decisions: a proposal to adopt the GRADE approach.
    Neumann I; Antó JM; Bousquet J; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 May; 157():146-153. PubMed ID: 36706871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.