These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33831387)

  • 21. Multicenter study of autoverification methods of hematology analysis.
    Zhao X; Wang XF; Wang JB; Lu XJ; Zhao YW; Li CB; Wang BH; Wei J; Guo P; Xiao JP; Wang JH; Yang XL
    J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2016; 30(2):571-7. PubMed ID: 27358150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An Objective Approach to Deriving the Clinical Performance of Autoverification Limits.
    Loh TP; Tan RZ; Lim CY; Markus C
    Ann Lab Med; 2022 Sep; 42(5):597-601. PubMed ID: 35470278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. General position of Croatian medical biochemistry laboratories on autovalidation: survey of the Working Group for Post-analytics of the Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine.
    Rimac V; Jokic A; Podolar S; Vlasic Tanaskovic J; Honovic L; Lenicek Krleza J
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2020 Jun; 30(2):020702. PubMed ID: 32292280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Artificial Neural Network Approach in Laboratory Test Reporting:  Learning Algorithms.
    Demirci F; Akan P; Kume T; Sisman AR; Erbayraktar Z; Sevinc S
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2016 Aug; 146(2):227-37. PubMed ID: 27473741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An approach to optimize delta checks in test panels - The effect of the number of rules included.
    Tan RZ; Markus C; Loh TP
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2020 May; 57(3):215-222. PubMed ID: 31955587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Autoverification process improvement by Six Sigma approach: Clinical chemistry & immunoassay.
    Randell EW; Short G; Lee N; Beresford A; Spencer M; Kennell M; Moores Z; Parry D
    Clin Biochem; 2018 May; 55():42-48. PubMed ID: 29518383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Implications of autoverification for the clinical laboratory.
    Pearlman ES; Bilello L; Stauffer J; Kamarinos A; Miele R; Wolfert MS
    Clin Leadersh Manag Rev; 2002; 16(4):237-9. PubMed ID: 12168427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Laboratory information system test environment: validate upgrades, prevent disasters, and assist training.
    Ashwood ER; Labart PL
    Clin Lab Manage Rev; 1992; 6(1):66-8, 70-1. PubMed ID: 10116936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Establishing and validating of an laboratory information system-based auto-verification system for biochemical test results in cancer patients.
    Yan C; Zhang Y; Li J; Gao J; Cui C; Zhang C; Song G; Yu M; Mu J; Chen F; Han X; Cui W
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2019 Jun; 33(5):e22877. PubMed ID: 30843281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Customized middleware experience in a tertiary care hospital hematology laboratory.
    Roland K; Yakimec J; Markin T; Chan G; Hudoba M
    J Pathol Inform; 2022; 13():100143. PubMed ID: 36268082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Impact of reference change value (RCV) based autoverification on turnaround time and physician satisfaction.
    Fernández-Grande E; Valera-Rodriguez C; Sáenz-Mateos L; Sastre-Gómez A; García-Chico P; Palomino-Muñoz TJ
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2017 Jun; 27(2):342-349. PubMed ID: 28694725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Development and Implementation of a Coagulation Factor Testing Method Utilizing Autoverification in a High-volume Clinical Reference Laboratory Environment.
    Riley PW; Gallea B; Valcour A
    J Pathol Inform; 2017; 8():25. PubMed ID: 28706751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Total laboratory automation: Do stat tests still matter?
    Dolci A; Giavarina D; Pasqualetti S; Szőke D; Panteghini M
    Clin Biochem; 2017 Jul; 50(10-11):605-611. PubMed ID: 28390779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Decision Support to Enhance Automated Laboratory Testing by Leveraging Analytical Capabilities.
    Tuthill JM
    Clin Lab Med; 2019 Jun; 39(2):259-267. PubMed ID: 31036279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The Effects of Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems on Laboratory Test Ordering: A Systematic Review.
    Delvaux N; Van Thienen K; Heselmans A; de Velde SV; Ramaekers D; Aertgeerts B
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2017 Apr; 141(4):585-595. PubMed ID: 28353386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Autoverification-based algorithms to detect preanalytical errors: Two examples.
    Wei R; Légaré W; McShane AJ
    Clin Biochem; 2023 May; 115():126-128. PubMed ID: 35779575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Implementation of a multirule, multistage quality control program in a clinical laboratory computer system.
    Eggert AA; Westgard JO; Barry PL; Emmerich KA
    J Med Syst; 1987 Dec; 11(6):391-411. PubMed ID: 3451939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evidence-based approach to setting delta check rules.
    Markus C; Tan RZ; Loh TP
    Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci; 2021 Jan; 58(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 32795201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Implementation of the Autovalidation Algorithm for Clinical Chemistry Testing in the Laboratory Information System.
    Rimac V; Lapic I; Kules K; Rogic D; Miler M
    Lab Med; 2018 Jul; 49(3):284-291. PubMed ID: 29432621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The optimization of total laboratory automation by simulation of a pull-strategy.
    Yang T; Wang TK; Li VC; Su CL
    J Med Syst; 2015 Jan; 39(1):162. PubMed ID: 25472727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.