These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

450 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33832565)

  • 1. SARS-CoV-2 in saliva, oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal specimens.
    Todsen T; Tolsgaard M; Folke F; Jakobsen KK; Ersbøll AK; Benfield T; von Buchwald C; Kirkby N
    Dan Med J; 2021 Apr; 68(5):. PubMed ID: 33832565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sensitivity of nasopharyngeal, oropharyngeal, and nasal wash specimens for SARS-CoV-2 detection in the setting of sampling device shortage.
    Calame A; Mazza L; Renzoni A; Kaiser L; Schibler M
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2021 Feb; 40(2):441-445. PubMed ID: 32939576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are Posterior Oropharyngeal Saliva Specimens an Acceptable Alternative to Nasopharyngeal Sampling for the Monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 in Primary-Care Settings?
    Masse S; Bonnet C; Vilcu AM; Benamar H; Swital M; van der Werf S; Carrat F; Hanslik T; Blanchon T; Falchi A
    Viruses; 2021 Apr; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 33926069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic Performance of Self-Collected Saliva Versus Nasopharyngeal Swab for the Molecular Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in the Clinical Setting.
    Uddin MKM; Shirin T; Hossain ME; Alam AN; Ami JQ; Hasan R; Miah M; Shaly NJ; Ahmed S; Rahman SMM; Rahman M; Banu S
    Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Dec; 9(3):e0046821. PubMed ID: 34730436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development and Evaluation of AccuPower COVID-19 Multiplex Real-Time RT-PCR Kit and AccuPower SARS-CoV-2 Multiplex Real-Time RT-PCR Kit for SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Sputum, NPS/OPS, Saliva and Pooled Samples.
    Suh IB; Lim J; Kim HS; Rhim G; Kim H; Kim H; Lee SM; Park HS; Song HJ; Hong M; Shin GS; Kim MJ
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(2):e0263341. PubMed ID: 35143538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 from Saliva as Compared to Nasopharyngeal Swabs in Outpatients.
    Kandel C; Zheng J; McCready J; Serbanescu MA; Racher H; Desaulnier M; Powis JE; Vojdani K; Finlay L; Sheldrake E; Vermeiren C; Katz K; McGeer A; Kozak R; Goneau LW
    Viruses; 2020 Nov; 12(11):. PubMed ID: 33212817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Saliva as a testing specimen with or without pooling for SARS-CoV-2 detection by multiplex RT-PCR test.
    Sun Q; Li J; Ren H; Pastor L; Loginova Y; Madej R; Taylor K; Wong JK; Zhang Z; Zhang A; Lu CM; Sha MY
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0243183. PubMed ID: 33621263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Multiplex One-Step RT-qPCR Protocol to Detect SARS-CoV-2 in NP/OP Swabs and Saliva.
    Bland J; Kavanaugh A; Hong LK; Perez O; Kadkol SS
    Curr Protoc; 2021 May; 1(5):e145. PubMed ID: 34004070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of saliva sampling as an alternative to oro-nasopharyngeal swab for detection of SARS-CoV-2 using unextracted rRT-PCR with the Allplex 2019-nCoV assay.
    Bergevin MA; Freppel W; Robert G; Ambaraghassi G; Aubry D; Haeck O; Saint-Jean M; Carignan A
    J Med Microbiol; 2021 Aug; 70(8):. PubMed ID: 34369860
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adding saliva testing to oropharyngeal and deep nasal swab testing increases PCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 in primary care and children.
    Oliver J; Tosif S; Lee LY; Costa AM; Bartel C; Last K; Clifford V; Daley A; Allard N; Orr C; Nind A; Alexander K; Meagher N; Sait M; Ballard SA; Williams E; Bond K; Williamson DA; Crawford NW; Gibney KB
    Med J Aust; 2021 Sep; 215(6):273-278. PubMed ID: 34287935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of an Automated High-Throughput Liquid-Based RNA Extraction Platform on Pooled Nasopharyngeal or Saliva Specimens for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR.
    Chu AW; Yip CC; Chan WM; Ng AC; Chan DL; Siu RH; Chung CYT; Ng JP; Kittur H; Mosley GL; Poon RW; Chiu RY; To KK
    Viruses; 2021 Apr; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 33918447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative evaluation of nasopharyngeal swab and saliva specimens for the molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Japanese patients with COVID-19.
    Sakanashi D; Asai N; Nakamura A; Miyazaki N; Kawamoto Y; Ohno T; Yamada A; Koita I; Suematsu H; Hagihara M; Shiota A; Kurumiya A; Sakata M; Kato S; Muramatsu Y; Koizumi Y; Kishino T; Ohashi W; Yamagishi Y; Mikamo H
    J Infect Chemother; 2021 Jan; 27(1):126-129. PubMed ID: 33060046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 PCR-Based Detection Using Saliva or Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimens in Asymptomatic Populations.
    Fan G; Qin X; Streblow DN; Hoyos CM; Hansel DE
    Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Sep; 9(1):e0006221. PubMed ID: 34431689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variation in SARS-CoV-2 molecular test sensitivity by specimen types in a large sample of emergency department patients.
    Bruxvoort K; Tenggardjaja CF; Slezak J; Gullett JC; Broder B; Park CH; Aragones M; Mercado C; Wong K; McLaren S; Jacobsen SJ
    Am J Emerg Med; 2021 Dec; 50():381-387. PubMed ID: 34478943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance comparison of the Cobas® Liat® and Cepheid® GeneXpert® systems on SARS-CoV-2 detection in nasopharyngeal swab and posterior oropharyngeal saliva.
    Tsang HF; Leung WMS; Chan LWC; Cho WCS; Wong SCC
    Expert Rev Mol Diagn; 2021 May; 21(5):515-518. PubMed ID: 33906571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative analysis of various clinical specimens in detection of SARS-CoV-2 using rRT-PCR in new and follow up cases of COVID-19 infection: Quest for the best choice.
    Sharma K; Aggarwala P; Gandhi D; Mathias A; Singh P; Sharma S; Negi SS; Bhargava A; Das P; Gaikwad U; Wankhede A; Behra A; Nagarkar NM
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0249408. PubMed ID: 33819290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Saliva is Comparable to Nasopharyngeal Swabs for Molecular Detection of SARS-CoV-2.
    Callahan C; Ditelberg S; Dutta S; Littlehale N; Cheng A; Kupczewski K; McVay D; Riedel S; Kirby JE; Arnaout R
    Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Sep; 9(1):e0016221. PubMed ID: 34406838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR Using Different Sample Sources: Review of the Literature.
    Torretta S; Zuccotti G; Cristofaro V; Ettori J; Solimeno L; Battilocchi L; D'Onghia A; Bonsembiante A; Pignataro L; Marchisio P; Capaccio P
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2021 Apr; 100(2_suppl):131S-138S. PubMed ID: 32865458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of simple nucleic acid extraction methods for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal and saliva specimens during global shortage of extraction kits.
    Chu AW; Chan WM; Ip JD; Yip CC; Chan JF; Yuen KY; To KK
    J Clin Virol; 2020 Aug; 129():104519. PubMed ID: 32629187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Higher SARS-CoV-2 detection of oropharyngeal compared with nasopharyngeal or saliva specimen for molecular testing: a multicentre randomised comparative accuracy study.
    Todsen T; Tolsgaard MG; Benfield T; Folke F; Jakobsen KK; Gredal NT; Ersbøll AK; von Buchwald C; Kirkby N
    Thorax; 2023 Oct; 78(10):1028-1034. PubMed ID: 37208187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.