152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33833497)
1. Hand-Held Nidek versus Table-Mounted Huvitz Autorefractors and Their Agreement with Subjective Refraction in Adults.
Sayed KM; Alsmman AH; Mostafa EM
Clin Ophthalmol; 2021; 15():1391-1401. PubMed ID: 33833497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Refractive Measures of Three Autorefractors in Children and Adolescents.
Xiong S; Lv M; Zou H; Zhu J; Lu L; Zhang B; Deng J; Yao C; He X; Xu X
Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Sep; 94(9):894-902. PubMed ID: 28816868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical evaluation of the Allergan Humphrey 500 autorefractor and the Nidek AR-1000 autorefractor.
Kinge B; Midelfart A; Jacobsen G
Br J Ophthalmol; 1996 Jan; 80(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 8664229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Refractive outcomes of table-mounted and hand-held auto-refractometers in children: an observational cross-sectional study.
Karabulut M; Karabulut S; Karalezli A
BMC Ophthalmol; 2021 Dec; 21(1):424. PubMed ID: 34879852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of spherical equivalent refraction and astigmatism measured with three different models of autorefractors.
Gwiazda J; Weber C
Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Jan; 81(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 14747762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical Accuracy of the Nidek ARK-1 Autorefractor.
Paudel N; Adhikari S; Thakur A; Shrestha B; Loughman J
Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Jun; 96(6):407-413. PubMed ID: 31107837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparisons of the handheld autorefractor, table-mounted autorefractor, and subjective refraction in Singapore adults.
Farook M; Venkatramani J; Gazzard G; Cheng A; Tan D; Saw SM
Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Dec; 82(12):1066-70. PubMed ID: 16357649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating refraction and visual acuity with the Nidek autorefractometer AR-360A in a randomized population-based screening study.
Stoor K; Karvonen E; Liinamaa J; Saarela V
Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 96(4):384-389. PubMed ID: 29193822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Agreement Between Retinoscopy, Autorefractometry and Subjective Refraction for Determining Refractive Errors in Congolese Children.
Mukash SN; Kayembe DL; Mwanza JC
Clin Optom (Auckl); 2021; 13():129-136. PubMed ID: 33907484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of autorefraction in an adult Indian population.
Kumar RS; Moe CA; Kumar D; Rackenchath MV; A V SD; Nagaraj S; Wittberg DM; Stamper RL; Keenan JD
PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251583. PubMed ID: 34010350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of autorefractor performance.
Pesudovs K; Weisinger HS
Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Jul; 81(7):554-8. PubMed ID: 15252356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the auto-refraction function of the Nidek OPD-Scan III.
McGinnigle S; Naroo SA; Eperjesi F
Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Mar; 97(2):160-3. PubMed ID: 24024877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Experiences with the hand-held autorefractometer "Retinomax" in adults and children].
Wesemann W; Dick B
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1997 Dec; 211(6):387-94. PubMed ID: 9498190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical evaluation of autorefraction and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia in Chinese school-aged children: a cross-sectional study.
Guo R; Shi L; Xu K; Hong D
Transl Pediatr; 2022 Jun; 11(6):933-946. PubMed ID: 35800271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The precision of wavefront refraction compared to subjective refraction and autorefraction.
Pesudovs K; Parker KE; Cheng H; Applegate RA
Optom Vis Sci; 2007 May; 84(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 17502821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ametropia detection using a novel, compact wavefront autorefractor.
Hernández CS; Gil A; Zaytouny A; Casares I; Poderoso J; de Lara A; Wehse A; Dave SR; Lim D; Lage E; Alejandre-Alba N
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2024 Mar; 44(2):311-320. PubMed ID: 38084770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Retinoscopy/autorefraction: which is the best starting point for a noncycloplegic refraction?
Jorge J; Queirós A; Almeida JB; Parafita MA
Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jan; 82(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 15630406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Non-cycloplegic spherical equivalent refraction in adults: comparison of the double-pass system, retinoscopy, subjective refraction and a table-mounted autorefractor.
Vilaseca M; Arjona M; Pujol J; Peris E; Martínez V
Int J Ophthalmol; 2013; 6(5):618-25. PubMed ID: 24195036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cycloplegic refraction in preschool children: comparisons between the hand-held autorefractor, table-mounted autorefractor and retinoscopy.
Prabakaran S; Dirani M; Chia A; Gazzard G; Fan Q; Leo SW; Ling Y; Au Eong KG; Wong TY; Saw SM
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Jul; 29(4):422-6. PubMed ID: 19523087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Accuracy of three common optometry methods in examination of refraction in juveniles].
Su T; Min X; Liu S; Li F; Tan X; Zhong Y; Deng S
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Feb; 41(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 26932216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
