159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33833566)
1. Comparison of the Psychometric Properties of the FLACC Scale, the MBPS and the Observer Applied Visual Analogue Scale Used to Assess Procedural Pain.
Crellin D; Harrison D; Santamaria N; Babl FE
J Pain Res; 2021; 14():881-892. PubMed ID: 33833566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Psychometric Properties of the Visual Analogue Scale Applied by an Observer to Assess Procedural Pain in Infants and Young Children: An Observational Study.
Crellin DJ; Harrison D; Santamaria N; Huque H; Babl FE
J Pediatr Nurs; 2021; 59():89-95. PubMed ID: 33561663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Psychometric Properties of the MBPS Scale Used to Assess Procedural Pain.
Crellin DJ; Babl FE; Santamaria N; Harrison D
J Pain; 2018 Jun; 19(6):660-669. PubMed ID: 29454046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Psychometric Properties of the FLACC Scale Used to Assess Procedural Pain.
Crellin DJ; Harrison D; Santamaria N; Huque H; Babl FE
J Pain; 2018 Aug; 19(8):862-872. PubMed ID: 29551662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Procedural Pain Scale Evaluation (PROPoSE) study: protocol for an evaluation of the psychometric properties of behavioural pain scales for the assessment of procedural pain in infants and children aged 6-42 months.
Crellin DJ; Harrison D; Hutchinson A; Schuster T; Santamaria N; Babl FE
BMJ Open; 2017 Sep; 7(9):e016225. PubMed ID: 28882914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of the COMFORT Behavior scale and the FLACC scale for pain assessment in Chinese children after cardiac surgery.
Bai J; Hsu L; Tang Y; van Dijk M
Pain Manag Nurs; 2012 Mar; 13(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 22341137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The use of the faces, legs, activity, cry and consolability scale to assess procedural pain and distress in young children.
Babl FE; Crellin D; Cheng J; Sullivan TP; O'Sullivan R; Hutchinson A
Pediatr Emerg Care; 2012 Dec; 28(12):1281-96. PubMed ID: 23187981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The FLACC behavioral scale for procedural pain assessment in children aged 5-16 years.
Nilsson S; Finnström B; Kokinsky E
Paediatr Anaesth; 2008 Aug; 18(8):767-74. PubMed ID: 18613934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of the validation of existing behavioral pain and distress scales for use in the procedural setting.
Crellin D; Sullivan TP; Babl FE; O'Sullivan R; Hutchinson A
Paediatr Anaesth; 2007 Aug; 17(8):720-33. PubMed ID: 17596217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Establishing intra- and inter-rater agreement of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale for evaluating pain in toddlers during immunization.
Gomez RJ; Barrowman N; Elia S; Manias E; Royle J; Harrison D
Pain Res Manag; 2013; 18(6):e124-8. PubMed ID: 24308028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of nurse accuracy in rating procedural pain among pediatric burn patients using the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Scale.
Shen J; Giles SA; Kurtovic K; Fabia R; Besner GE; Wheeler KK; Xiang H; Groner JI
Burns; 2017 Feb; 43(1):114-120. PubMed ID: 27576937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability of the Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability Scale in Assessing Acute Pain in the Pediatric Emergency Department.
Kochman A; Howell J; Sheridan M; Kou M; Shelton Ryan EE; Lee S; Zettersten W; Yoder L
Pediatr Emerg Care; 2017 Jan; 33(1):14-17. PubMed ID: 27977532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Verifying the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Behavioral Scale.
Matsuishi Y; Hoshino H; Shimojo N; Enomoto Y; Kido T; Hoshino T; Sumitani M; Inoue Y
PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0194094. PubMed ID: 29534083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Systematic review of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability scale for assessing pain in infants and children: is it reliable, valid, and feasible for use?
Crellin DJ; Harrison D; Santamaria N; Babl FE
Pain; 2015 Nov; 156(11):2132-2151. PubMed ID: 26207651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Systematic Review of the Psychometric Properties of the Modified Behavioral Pain Scale (MBPS).
Crellin DJ; Babl FE; Santamaria N; Harrison D
J Pediatr Nurs; 2018; 40():14-26. PubMed ID: 29776475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Self-report of pain in young people and adults with spastic cerebral palsy: interrater reliability of the revised Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (r-FLACC) scale ratings.
Fox MA; Ayyangar R; Parten R; Haapala HJ; Schilling SG; Kalpakjian CZ
Dev Med Child Neurol; 2019 Jan; 61(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 30051908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validity of the Korean Version of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability Scale for Assessment of Pain in Dementia Patients.
Moon Y; Kim YS; Lee J; Han SH
J Korean Med Sci; 2017 Nov; 32(11):1852-1856. PubMed ID: 28960040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical validation of the Multidimensional Assessment of Pain Scale.
Ramelet AS; Rees NW; McDonald S; Bulsara MK; Huijer Abu-Saad H
Paediatr Anaesth; 2007 Dec; 17(12):1156-65. PubMed ID: 17986034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The revised FLACC observational pain tool: improved reliability and validity for pain assessment in children with cognitive impairment.
Malviya S; Voepel-Lewis T; Burke C; Merkel S; Tait AR
Paediatr Anaesth; 2006 Mar; 16(3):258-65. PubMed ID: 16490089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Systematic Review of the Measurement Properties of Face, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability Scale for Pediatric Pain Assessment.
Peng T; Qu S; Du Z; Chen Z; Xiao T; Chen R
J Pain Res; 2023; 16():1185-1196. PubMed ID: 37064956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
