These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33834750)

  • 1. A novel, low-cost transradial socket fabrication method using mass-producible components and expanding rigid foam.
    Miller LA; Pickerill T; Kuiken TA
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2021 Feb; 45(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 33834750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Plastic soda bottles: a reusable material for making transradial sockets.
    Wu Y; Casanova HR; Ikeda AJ
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2009 Jun; 33(2):100-6. PubMed ID: 19367513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Northwestern University Flexible Subischial Vacuum Socket for persons with transfemoral amputation-Part 1: Description of technique.
    Fatone S; Caldwell R
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Jun; 41(3):237-245. PubMed ID: 28094686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantification of rectifications for the Northwestern University Flexible Sub-Ischial Vacuum Socket.
    Fatone S; Johnson WB; Tran L; Tucker K; Mowrer C; Caldwell R
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Jun; 41(3):251-257. PubMed ID: 28094689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Northwestern University Flexible Subischial Vacuum Socket for persons with transfemoral amputation: Part 2 Description and Preliminary evaluation.
    Fatone S; Caldwell R
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Jun; 41(3):246-250. PubMed ID: 28132589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-dimensional printing in prosthetics: Method for managing rapid limb volume change.
    Nickel E; Barrons K; Hand B; Cataldo A; Hansen A
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2020 Oct; 44(5):355-358. PubMed ID: 32580681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A qualitative study on stakeholder perceptions of digital prosthetic socket fabrication for transtibial amputations.
    Mayo AL; Gould S; Cimino SR; Glasford S; Harvey E; Ratto M; Hitzig SL
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2022 Dec; 46(6):607-613. PubMed ID: 36515905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adjustable prosthetic sockets: a systematic review of industrial and research design characteristics and their justifications.
    Baldock M; Pickard N; Prince M; Kirkwood S; Chadwell A; Howard D; Dickinson A; Kenney L; Gill N; Curtin S
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2023 Nov; 20(1):147. PubMed ID: 37926807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of transhumeral socket designs utilizing patient assessment and in vivo skeletal and socket motion tracking: a case study.
    Resnik L; Patel T; Cooney SG; Crisco JJ; Fantini C
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2016; 11(5):423-32. PubMed ID: 25425411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using mechanical testing to assess texturing of prosthetic sockets to improve suspension in the transverse plane and reduce rotation.
    Quinlan J; Subramanian V; Yohay J; Poziembo B; Fatone S
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0233148. PubMed ID: 32525868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Case study: survey of patient satisfaction with prosthesis quality and design among below-knee prosthetic leg socket users.
    Mohd Hawari N; Jawaid M; Md Tahir P; Azmeer RA
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2017 Nov; 12(8):868-874. PubMed ID: 28068847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adjustable sockets may improve residual limb fluid volume retention in transtibial prosthesis users.
    Brzostowski JT; Larsen BG; Youngblood RT; Ciol MA; Hafner BJ; Gurrey CJ; McLean JB; Allyn KJ; Sanders JE
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Jun; 43(3):250-256. PubMed ID: 30628522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Feasibility testing of a novel prosthetic socket sensor system.
    Rich TL; Voss G; Fairhurst S; Matsumoto M; Brielmaier S; Koester K; Netoff TI; Hansen AH; Ferguson JE
    Disabil Rehabil; 2023 Jul; 45(14):2374-2381. PubMed ID: 35797711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Advanced trans-tibial socket fabrication using selective laser sintering.
    Rogers B; Bosker GW; Crawford RH; Faustini MC; Neptune RR; Walden G; Gitter AJ
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2007 Mar; 31(1):88-100. PubMed ID: 17365888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interface Pressure System to Compare the Functional Performance of Prosthetic Sockets during the Gait in People with Trans-Tibial Amputation.
    Ibarra Aguila S; Sánchez GJ; Sauvain EE; Alemon B; Fuentes-Aguilar RQ; Huegel JC
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Dec; 20(24):. PubMed ID: 33317006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Osseointegrated Prosthetic Implants for People With Lower-Limb Amputation: A Health Technology Assessment.
    Ontario Health (Quality)
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2019; 19(7):1-126. PubMed ID: 31911825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the new, patient-adjustable socket system Varos in the early phase of prosthetic rehabilitation: a pilot study.
    Nia A; Toetschinger G; Kubinec T; Domayer S
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2022 Jun; 58(3):462-469. PubMed ID: 35148042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Structural testing of lower-limb prosthetic sockets: A systematic review.
    Gariboldi F; Pasquarelli D; Cutti AG
    Med Eng Phys; 2022 Jan; 99():103742. PubMed ID: 35058025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pressure casting technique for transtibial prosthetic socket fit in developing countries.
    Lee PV; Lythgo N; Laing S; Lavranos J; Thanh NH
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 24805897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Design of lower limb prosthetic sockets: a review.
    Wang M; Nong Q; Liu Y; Yu H
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2022 Jan; 19(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 34932435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.