238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33835255)
1. Evaluation of the learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy.
van der Schans EM; Verheijen PM; Moumni ME; Broeders IAMJ; Consten ECJ
Surg Endosc; 2022 Mar; 36(3):2096-2104. PubMed ID: 33835255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for external or internal rectal prolapse and enterocele: a randomized controlled trial.
Mäkelä-Kaikkonen J; Rautio T; Pääkkö E; Biancari F; Ohtonen P; Mäkelä J
Colorectal Dis; 2016 Oct; 18(10):1010-1015. PubMed ID: 26919191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robot-Assisted Ventral Mesh Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse: A 5-Year Experience at a Tertiary Referral Center.
van Iersel JJ; Formijne Jonkers HA; Paulides TJC; Verheijen PM; Draaisma WA; Consten ECJ; Broeders IAMJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2017 Nov; 60(11):1215-1223. PubMed ID: 28991087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Technical modifications for cost optimization in robot-assisted ventral mesh rectopexy: an initial experience.
Marra AA; Campennì P; De Simone V; Parello A; Litta F; Ratto C
Tech Coloproctol; 2023 Jul; 27(7):551-557. PubMed ID: 36802041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is robotic-assisted ventral mesh rectopexy superior to laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy in the management of obstructed defaecation?
Mantoo S; Podevin J; Regenet N; Rigaud J; Lehur PA; Meurette G
Colorectal Dis; 2013 Aug; 15(8):e469-75. PubMed ID: 23895633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-analysis and quality of life after laparoscopic and robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for posterior compartment prolapse: a randomized trial.
Mäkelä-Kaikkonen J; Rautio T; Ohinmaa A; Koivurova S; Ohtonen P; Sintonen H; Mäkelä J
Tech Coloproctol; 2019 May; 23(5):461-470. PubMed ID: 31069557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Meta-analysis on current status, efficacy, and safety of laparoscopic and robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for rectal prolapse treatment: can robotic surgery become the gold standard?
Bao X; Wang H; Song W; Chen Y; Luo Y
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2021 Aug; 36(8):1685-1694. PubMed ID: 33646353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a single-institution experience.
Inaba CS; Sujatha-Bhaskar S; Koh CY; Jafari MD; Mills SD; Carmichael JC; Stamos MJ; Pigazzi A
Tech Coloproctol; 2017 Aug; 21(8):667-671. PubMed ID: 28871416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Increased cost burden associated with robot-assisted rectopexy: do patient outcomes justify increased expenditure?
Wlodarczyk J; Brabender D; Gupta A; Gaur K; Madiedo A; Lee SW; Hsieh C
Surg Endosc; 2023 Mar; 37(3):2119-2126. PubMed ID: 36315284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Learning curves and surgical outcomes for proctored adoption of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy: cumulative sum curve analysis.
Pucher PH; Mayo D; Dixon AR; Clarke A; Lamparelli MJ
Surg Endosc; 2017 Mar; 31(3):1421-1426. PubMed ID: 27495333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mid-term functional and quality of life outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy: multicenter comparative matched-pair analyses.
Laitakari KE; Mäkelä-Kaikkonen JK; Kössi J; Kairaluoma M; Koivurova S; Pollari L; Ohtonen P; Rautio TT
Tech Coloproctol; 2022 Apr; 26(4):253-260. PubMed ID: 34935090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Short-term outcome of laparoscopic versus robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Is robotic superior?
Mehmood RK; Parker J; Bhuvimanian L; Qasem E; Mohammed AA; Zeeshan M; Grugel K; Carter P; Ahmed S
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2014 Sep; 29(9):1113-8. PubMed ID: 24965859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term outcomes of robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for external rectal prolapse.
Postillon A; Perrenot C; Germain A; Scherrer ML; Buisset C; Brunaud L; Ayav A; Bresler L
Surg Endosc; 2020 Feb; 34(2):930-939. PubMed ID: 31183789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic vs. laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for external rectal prolapse and rectal intussusception: a systematic review.
Albayati S; Chen P; Morgan MJ; Toh JWT
Tech Coloproctol; 2019 Jun; 23(6):529-535. PubMed ID: 31254202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Current status of laparoscopic and robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for external and internal rectal prolapse.
van Iersel JJ; Paulides TJ; Verheijen PM; Lumley JW; Broeders IA; Consten EC
World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Jun; 22(21):4977-87. PubMed ID: 27275090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse.
Perrenot C; Germain A; Scherrer ML; Ayav A; Brunaud L; Bresler L
Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 Jul; 56(7):909-14. PubMed ID: 23739199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for rectal prolapse.
Chaoui AM; Chaoui I; Olivier F; Geers J; Abasbassi M
Acta Chir Belg; 2024 Apr; 124(2):91-98. PubMed ID: 36905354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Restored pelvic anatomy is preserved after laparoscopic and robot-assisted ventral rectopexy: MRI-based 5-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.
Laitakari KE; Mäkelä-Kaikkonen JK; Pääkkö E; Kata I; Ohtonen P; Mäkelä J; Rautio TT
Colorectal Dis; 2020 Nov; 22(11):1667-1676. PubMed ID: 32544283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evolution of male rectal prolapse surgery and initial experience of robotic rectopexy in men.
Siddika A; Saha S; Siddiqi S
J Robot Surg; 2017 Sep; 11(3):311-316. PubMed ID: 27830430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does Ventral Rectopexy Improve Pelvic Floor Function in the Long Term?
Mäkelä-Kaikkonen J; Rautio T; Kairaluoma M; Carpelan-Holmström M; Kössi J; Rautio A; Ohtonen P; Mäkelä J
Dis Colon Rectum; 2018 Feb; 61(2):230-238. PubMed ID: 29337779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
