238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33835255)
21. Robotic-assisted and laparoscopic ventral rectopexy in the treatment of rectal prolapse: a matched-pairs study of operative details and complications.
Mäkelä-Kaikkonen J; Rautio T; Klintrup K; Takala H; Vierimaa M; Ohtonen P; Mäkelä J
Tech Coloproctol; 2014 Feb; 18(2):151-5. PubMed ID: 23839795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Bokhari MB; Patel CB; Ramos-Valadez DI; Ragupathi M; Haas EM
Surg Endosc; 2011 Mar; 25(3):855-60. PubMed ID: 20734081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Day case robotic ventral rectopexy compared with day case laparoscopic ventral rectopexy: a prospective study.
Faucheron JL; Trilling B; Barbois S; Sage PY; Waroquet PA; Reche F
Tech Coloproctol; 2016 Oct; 20(10):695-700. PubMed ID: 27530905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis studying operative times and complications for a surgeon transitioning from laparoscopic to robot-assisted pediatric pyeloplasty: Defining proficiency and competency.
Stern N; Li Y; Wang PZ; Dave S
J Pediatr Urol; 2022 Dec; 18(6):822-829. PubMed ID: 36064506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Is robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for pelvic floor disorders better than laparoscopic approach at the beginning of the experience? A retrospective single-center study.
Dumas C; Duclos J; Le Huu Nho R; Fermo M; Gomez E; Henin A; Vaisse C; Pirro N; Aubert M; Mege D
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 Aug; 38(1):216. PubMed ID: 37589810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prior experience in laparoscopic rectal surgery can minimise the learning curve for robotic rectal resections: a cumulative sum analysis.
Odermatt M; Ahmed J; Panteleimonitis S; Khan J; Parvaiz A
Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4067-4076. PubMed ID: 28271267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Could robotic-assisted surgery reduce mesh-related complications after ventral mesh rectopexy? Experience of a tertiary centre and systematic review of the literature.
Yasar NF; Waked W; Sturiale A; Fabiani B; Naldini G
Colorectal Dis; 2024 Apr; 26(4):609-621. PubMed ID: 38459408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Robotic versus laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Flynn J; Larach JT; Kong JCH; Warrier SK; Heriot A
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2021 Aug; 36(8):1621-1631. PubMed ID: 33718972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Surgical decision-making for rectal prolapse: one size does not fit all.
Lee A; Kin C; Syan R; Morris A; Gurland B
Postgrad Med; 2020 Apr; 132(3):256-262. PubMed ID: 31525304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpo(recto)pexy: a cumulative sum analysis.
van Zanten F; Schraffordt Koops SE; Pasker-De Jong PCM; Lenters E; Schreuder HWR
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Nov; 221(5):483.e1-483.e11. PubMed ID: 31152711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Early experience with ambulatory robotic ventral rectopexy.
Trilling B; Sage PY; Reche F; Barbois S; Waroquet PA; Faucheron JL
J Visc Surg; 2018 Feb; 155(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 29396113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Using a modified Delphi process to explore international surgeon-reported benefits of robotic-assisted surgery to perform abdominal rectopexy.
Keating T; Fleming CA; Brannigan AE;
Tech Coloproctol; 2022 Dec; 26(12):953-962. PubMed ID: 35986805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Learning curve of robot-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal (rTAPP) inguinal hernia repair: a cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis.
Kudsi OY; Bou-Ayash N; Gokcal F; Crawford AS; Chung SK; Chudner A; Litwin D
Surg Endosc; 2022 Mar; 36(3):1827-1837. PubMed ID: 33825019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Partial Delorme procedure for the management of recurrent isolated posterior wall prolapse after robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for rectal prolapse.
Bertucci Zoccali M; Church JM; Kiran PR
Tech Coloproctol; 2023 Oct; 27(10):957-958. PubMed ID: 37328670
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Ninety-day morbidity of robot-assisted redo surgery for recurrent rectal prolapse, mesh erosion and pelvic pain: lessons learned from 9 years' experience in a tertiary referral centre.
van der Schans EM; Verheijen PM; Broeders IAMJ; Consten ECJ
Colorectal Dis; 2021 Dec; 23(12):3205-3212. PubMed ID: 34741395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Bowel function after laparoscopic posterior sutured rectopexy versus ventral mesh rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a double-blind, randomised single-centre study.
Lundby L; Iversen LH; Buntzen S; Wara P; Høyer K; Laurberg S
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 Dec; 1(4):291-297. PubMed ID: 28404199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Laparoscopic management of persistent complete rectal prolapse in children.
Ismail M; Gabr K; Shalaby R
J Pediatr Surg; 2010 Mar; 45(3):533-9. PubMed ID: 20223316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Simultaneous development of laparoscopy and robotics provides acceptable perioperative outcomes and shows robotics to have a faster learning curve and to be overall faster in rectal cancer surgery: analysis of novice MIS surgeon learning curves.
Melich G; Hong YK; Kim J; Hur H; Baik SH; Kim NK; Sender Liberman A; Min BS
Surg Endosc; 2015 Mar; 29(3):558-68. PubMed ID: 25030474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Learning curves of robotic extended totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) hernia repair among two surgeons at a high-volume community hospital: a cumulative sum analysis.
Korneffel K; Nuzzo W; Belden CM; McPhail L; O'Connor S
Surg Endosc; 2023 Dec; 37(12):9351-9357. PubMed ID: 37640953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Is robotic ventral mesh rectopexy better than laparoscopy in the treatment of rectal prolapse and obstructed defecation? A meta-analysis.
Ramage L; Georgiou P; Tekkis P; Tan E
Tech Coloproctol; 2015 Jul; 19(7):381-9. PubMed ID: 26041559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
