These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
64 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3383534)
1. [Effect of in vivo nuclear magnetic resonance tomography on somatosensory and visual evoked potentials in the human]. Vogl T; Paulus W; Fuchs A; Krimmel K; Krafczyk S Digitale Bilddiagn; 1988 Mar; 8(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 3383534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Visual evoked cortical potentials modified by a NMR magnetic field of 0.24 Tesla]. Bunkrad M; Bende T; Seiler T; Wollensak J Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1989; 86(6):702-5. PubMed ID: 2625302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of magnetic resonance imaging on evoked potentials and nerve conduction velocities in humans. Vogl TJ; Paulus W; Fuchs A; Krafczyk S; Lissner J Invest Radiol; 1991 May; 26(5):432-7. PubMed ID: 2055741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Somatosensory amplification and its relationship to somatosensory, auditory, and visual evoked and event-related potentials (P300). Nakao M; Barsky AJ; Nishikitani M; Yano E; Murata K Neurosci Lett; 2007 Mar; 415(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 17267120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Visual evoked magnetic responses to central and peripheral stimulation: simultaneous VEP recordings. Brecelj J; Kakigi R; Koyama S; Hoshiyama M Brain Topogr; 1998; 10(3):227-37. PubMed ID: 9562544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does acute exposure to the electromagnetic field emitted by a mobile phone influence visual evoked potentials? A pilot study. Urban P; Lukás E; Roth Z Cent Eur J Public Health; 1998 Nov; 6(4):288-90. PubMed ID: 9919379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in an open low-field magnetic resonance imaging system: clinical experience and technical considerations. Szelényi A; Gasser T; Seifert V Neurosurgery; 2008 Oct; 63(4 Suppl 2):268-75; discussion 275-6. PubMed ID: 18981832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Somatosensory and visual evoked potentials in children with cerebral palsy: correlations and discrepancies with MRI findings and clinical picture. Kułak W; Sobaniec W; Sołowiej E; Boćkowski L Pediatr Rehabil; 2006; 9(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 17050398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlations of evoked potentials with MR imaging and MR spectroscopy in multiple sclerosis. Kraft GH; Richards TL; Heide AC Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 1998 Aug; 9(3):561-7, vi. PubMed ID: 9894109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Static NMR magnetic fields change somatosensory evoked potentials in the human]. von Klitzing L; Gerhard H; Benthin U; Jörg J EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb; 1987 Mar; 18(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 3106006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Somatosensory, motor and special visual evoked potentials to single and double stimulation in "Parkinson's disease" an early diagnostic test? Jörg J; Gerhard H J Neural Transm Suppl; 1987; 25():81-8. PubMed ID: 3480940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of the static magnetic field of the MR-scanner on ERPs: evaluation of visual, cognitive and motor potentials. Assecondi S; Vanderperren K; Novitskiy N; Ramautar JR; Fias W; Staelens S; Stiers P; Sunaert S; Van Huffel S; Lemahieu I Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 May; 121(5):672-85. PubMed ID: 20097609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Specific changes in somatosensory evoked magnetic fields during recovery from sensorimotor stroke. Wikström H; Roine RO; Aronen HJ; Salonen O; Sinkkonen J; Ilmoniemi RJ; Huttunen J Ann Neurol; 2000 Mar; 47(3):353-60. PubMed ID: 10716255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Somatosensory evoked potentials after magnetic stimulation at different points of the body in normal subjects and in patients with syringomyelia. Masur H; Klostermann F; Oberwittler C; Papke K Funct Neurol; 1996; 11(5):253-9. PubMed ID: 9119268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Feasibility of cardiac gating free of interference with electro-magnetic fields at 1.5 Tesla, 3.0 Tesla and 7.0 Tesla using an MR-stethoscope. Frauenrath T; Hezel F; Heinrichs U; Kozerke S; Utting JF; Kob M; Butenweg C; Boesiger P; Niendorf T Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):539-47. PubMed ID: 19652614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Superficial siderosis of the central nervous system: an electrophysiological study]. Shimo Y; Nohara C; Hotta M; Miwa H; Mizuno Y No To Shinkei; 1998 Apr; 50(4):361-5. PubMed ID: 9592826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [ECG changes caused by the effect of static magnetic fields of nuclear magnetic resonance tomography using magnets with a field power of 0.5 to 4.0 Telsa]. Weikl A; Moshage W; Hentschel D; Schittenhelm R; Bachmann K Z Kardiol; 1989 Sep; 78(9):578-86. PubMed ID: 2815912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Spinal cord lesions in diabetes mellitus. Somatosensory and motor evoked potentials and spinal conduction time in diabetes mellitus. Kucera P; Goldenberg Z; Varsik P; Buranova D; Traubner P Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2005 Apr; 26(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 15855886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of ethanol on human visual evoked potentials. Resende LA; Adoni T; Kimaid PA; Ragazzo P; Ehlers JA Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2001 Sep; 41(6):349-52. PubMed ID: 11680859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Utility of multimodal evoked potentials study in neurofibromatosis type 1 of childhood. Ammendola A; Ciccone G; Ammendola E Pediatr Neurol; 2006 Apr; 34(4):276-80. PubMed ID: 16638501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]