These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3383561)

  • 1. Robust alternatives to traditional analysis of variance: Welch W*, James J I*, James J II*, Brown-Forsythe BF*.
    Reed JF; Stark DB
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1988; 26(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 3383561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing the Performance of Approaches for Testing the Homogeneity of Variance Assumption in One-Factor ANOVA Models.
    Wang Y; Rodríguez de Gil P; Chen YH; Kromrey JD; Kim ES; Pham T; Nguyen D; Romano JL
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2017 Apr; 77(2):305-329. PubMed ID: 29795915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analyzing Multivariate Repeated Measures Designs: A Comparison of Two Approximate Degrees of Freedom Procedures.
    Lix LM; Algina J; Keselman HJ
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2003 Oct; 38(4):403-31. PubMed ID: 26777441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Power comparison of new tests to analyze repeated measures data].
    Livacic-Rojas P; Vallejo G; Fernández P
    Psicothema; 2007 Nov; 19(4):673-8. PubMed ID: 17959125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Generalization of the Brown-Forsythe approach to factorial designs].
    Vallejo Seco G; Fernández García MP; Livacic Rojas PE
    Psicothema; 2008 Nov; 20(4):969-73. PubMed ID: 18940112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robust tests for multivariate factorial designs under heteroscedasticity.
    Vallejo G; Ato M
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Jun; 44(2):471-89. PubMed ID: 21994181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Issues in biomedical statistics: comparing means under normal distribution theory.
    Ludbrook J
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1995 Apr; 65(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 7717947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A robust approach for analyzing unbalanced factorial designs with fixed levels.
    Vallejo G; Ato M; Fernández MP
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 May; 42(2):607-17. PubMed ID: 20479192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robust tests of equivalence for k independent groups.
    Koh A; Cribbie R
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Nov; 66(3):426-34. PubMed ID: 23043500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of sample non-normality on ANOVA and alternative methods.
    Lantz B
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 May; 66(2):224-44. PubMed ID: 22624658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of non-normality on test statistics for one-way independent groups designs.
    Cribbie RA; Fiksenbaum L; Keselman HJ; Wilcox RR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 Feb; 65(1):56-73. PubMed ID: 21426313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A SAS/IML program for implementing the modified Brown-Forsythe procedure in repeated measures designs.
    Vallejo G; Moris J; Conejo NM
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2006 Sep; 83(3):169-77. PubMed ID: 16934362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using Johnson's transformation and robust estimators with heteroscedastic test statistics: an examination of the effects of non-normality and heterogeneity in the non-orthogonal two-way ANOVA design.
    Luh WM; Guo JH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2001 May; 54(Pt 1):79-94. PubMed ID: 11393903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. SCAN, an exploratory program for preliminary analysis of bioassay and immunoassay data.
    Gaines Das RE; Rice LR
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1985 Oct; 21(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 3852711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Controlling the Type I error rate by using the nonparametric bootstrap when comparing means.
    Parra-Frutos I
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 Feb; 67(1):117-32. PubMed ID: 23647492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Consequences of choosing samples in hypothesis testing to ensure homogeneity of variance.
    Zimmerman DW
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 Feb; 67(1):1-29. PubMed ID: 23330909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A practical method for analyzing factorial designs with heteroscedastic data.
    Vallejo G; Ato M; Fernández MP; Livacic-Rojas PE
    Psychol Rep; 2008 Jun; 102(3):643-56. PubMed ID: 18763432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Power of a test that is robust against variance heterogeneity.
    Overall JE; Atlas RS; Gibson JM
    Psychol Rep; 1995 Aug; 77(1):155-9. PubMed ID: 7501755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. One-way analysis of variance with unequal variances.
    Rice WR; Gaines SD
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1989 Nov; 86(21):8183-4. PubMed ID: 2813387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modern robust statistical methods: an easy way to maximize the accuracy and power of your research.
    Erceg-Hurn DM; Mirosevich VM
    Am Psychol; 2008 Oct; 63(7):591-601. PubMed ID: 18855490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.